- Dołączono
- 16 Gru 2019
And they're enabled in this in that MOST interactions that "don't matter" (retail, etc) if the person understands what you want even if you're asking for it in an outright insane matter, and they can give it to you with no major cost to themselves, will do so.The think plightsperging is an adequate substitute for everything in life. They want the whole championship handed to them for a trophy for the same effort of earning a praticipation trophy.
For the majority of Greee's life, the person he's conversing with is not contemplating the plights being spewed forth, but thinking "how can I get rid of this retard?"
And the courts even do it, somewhat, for pro se retards; and this is the first time he's gotten past the hand-rails part.
Interestingly the only Court in the USA that continues to do it all the way through the case is the Supremes, they will contemplate arguments that the lawyers could or should have made, but didn't (e.g., the ACA is a tax argument iirc).
As far as I know, except maybe in bench trials, the court isn't supposed to take notice of shit not said "once the trial is really started" which I presume begins somewhere at or around discovery.