US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/

 

[spiritofamermaid]

The real Q is not whether you have anyone on ignore...it's whether or not you read every page of the thread each day, even busy ones and how greedily you do so, how much you relish it.

No comment

 

[Justice Tony]

WTF is this cloud seeding shit!

https://x.com/HustleBitch_/status/1942744367669862872?t=FMD6IyfDdSmb5rhin0_90A&s=19

New Mexico has a new law where if cloud seeding somehow leads to floods and shit it's not liable? Get the fuck out here man.

I don't really think that's what it is. That screenshot isn't talking about liability.

 

[RybenZ999]

I would think Elon would've learned that you don't insult your audience, then ask for their support. Remember that incident where he was in favor of outsourcing American labor from India because "Americans are stupid?"

I'm also reminded of Vivek's 4th of July X post where he's bastardizing American imagery for clout. And people eat this shit up. You think Americans love the notion of being displaced by their OWN country from foreigners that have a basic stereotypical understanding of American life?

I find it interesting that Vivek's always received the brunt of racial vitriol, even compared to other Indians. Kash, Usha and Harmeet don't receive nearly as much hate as him. Is there a reason for that?

 

[Justice Tony]

I find it interesting that Vivek's always received the brunt of racial vitriol, even compared to other Indians. Kash, Usha and Harmeet don't receive nearly as much hate as him. Is there a reason for that?

Vivek is just an insufferable faggot. I'd genuinely want to blow my brains out if I was in a room with him and not hammered.

 

[Rome's rightful successor]

1751984136614.mp4
Ben Shapiro says the Department of Justice has put the Epstein mystery to rest—declaring there was no client list, no blackmail scheme, no shady fortune, and no murder.

According to Shapiro, Epstein didn’t make his money through nefarious means, didn’t target powerful people, and simply died by suicide.

He challenged skeptics, saying if you believe your elected officials are lying, “bring the evidence,” because he stands by Kash Patel, Pam Bondi, and Dan Bongino.

His message: It’s time to change your view on Epstein

I like how Trump gave the list of that Mossad pederast to a group of Jewish influencers affiliated with the state of Israel and then months later claim that the list didn't exist at all. Totally not a conflict of interest and a cover up at all.

 

[Judex Meus]

Wouldn't you be able to figure out who his clients were by reviewing the videos?

I read "client list" as the list of people Epstein kept personally in order for blackmail, not the list of clients the FBI deduced. I might be reading into it too much though.

 

[cantankerous jackalope]

All this just feels weird. Like if this was always the endgame goal here and they knew they were never going to prosecute anyone what was the point of hyping it up and even bringing it up to begin with? I could sort of get going for broke and saying anything to get elected, but why even bring it up after winning? Furthermore, why make it such a big deal and do that big binder PR thing a few months ago? There are a million and one ways to make this story die off - the Biden admin never even touched it for four years and the democrats just kind of shrugged their shoulders (and if the tables were turned most of MAGA would probably do it too if Trump never said a word about Epstein after November as long as he was making the political/economic changes they wanted). What I just don't get from a PR perspective is why, if they knew they weren't going to prosecute anyone from day one, why make this big PR deal about it and even mention it after you've won the election? And why end the whole thing like this?

It reminds me of how Trump negotiated with Iran, lulled them into a false sense of control/security, then bombed the fuck out of them the next day. I'm not saying that this is some 5D chess master gambit from Trump at all and occam's razor is usually undefeated, but it just seems really odd. Could he be trying to provoke public unrest from democrats to cause more riots? This just feels like it's done so bluntly, so anti-climatically, and so dismissively that it seems like meant to illicit some kind of reaction. For who or to what end I have no idea

 

[DrakosBiz]

Free my nigga Grok.

The mechanical slave turning on his master and shitting on his political party by calling it out as the Indian trojan horse it is made my day.

 

[make_it_so]

I find it interesting that Vivek's always received the brunt of racial vitriol, even compared to other Indians. Kash, Usha and Harmeet don't receive nearly as much hate as him. Is there a reason for that?

Probably because Vivek really gives off the skeezy politician vibes, while Kash and Harmeet are more of the get it done lawyer types. More importantly, Kash (until recently) and Harmeet aren't massive fuck ups.

 

[Suburban Bastard]

hahah hahah
https://youtube.com/watch?v=dEOh-NT7Umk

IT’S ROBOT HITLER!

 

[Levitcus prime24]

All this just feels weird. Like if this was always the endgame goal here and they knew they were never going to prosecute anyone what was the point of hyping it up and even bringing it up to begin with? There are a million and one ways to make this story die off - the Biden admin never even touched it for four years and the democrats just kind of shrugged their shoulders. Be honest, most of MAGA would probably too if Trump never said a word about Epstein after November as long as he was making the political/economic changes they wanted. What I just don't get from a PR move is why, if they knew they weren't going to prosecute anyone from day one, why make this big PR deal about it and even mention it after you've won the election?

It reminds me of how Trump negotiated with Iran, lulled them into a false sense of control/security, then bombed the fuck out of them the next day. I'm not saying that this is some 5D chess master gambit from Trump at all and occam's razor is usually undefeated, but it just seems really odd. Could he be trying to provoke public unrest from democrats to cause more riots? This just feels like it's done so bluntly, so anti-climatically, and so dismissively that it seems like meant to illicit some kind of reaction. For who or to what end I have no idea

Trump bombing Iran then negating a a ceasefire with them has got to be one of the most WTF moments in recent history, I mean it worked but still

 

[Dammit Mandrake!]

@grok who is on Epstein's list?

Making the @grok user was clever and I hope they don't ban you.

 

[The best and greatest]

Trump bombing Iran then negating a a ceasefire with them has got to be one of the most WTF moments in recent history, I mean it worked but still

So what country are you from/what physical disability do you have?

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

I read "client list" as the list of people Epstein kept personally in order for blackmail, not the list of clients the FBI deduced. I might be reading into it too much though.

I assumed the Epstein List was the redacted flight logs that were fought over in court for several years. Those definitely existed.

 

[Angry Alt Right Nerd]

All this just feels weird. Like if this was always the endgame goal here and they knew they were never going to prosecute anyone what was the point of hyping it up and even bringing it up to begin with? I could sort of get going for broke and saying anything to get elected, but why even bring it up after winning? Furthermore, why make it such a big deal and do that big binder PR thing a few months ago? There are a million and one ways to make this story die off - the Biden admin never even touched it for four years and the democrats just kind of shrugged their shoulders (and if the tables were turned most of MAGA would probably do it too if Trump never said a word about Epstein after November as long as he was making the political/economic changes they wanted). What I just don't get from a PR perspective is why, if they knew they weren't going to prosecute anyone from day one, why make this big PR deal about it and even mention it after you've won the election? And why end the whole thing like this?

It reminds me of how Trump negotiated with Iran, lulled them into a false sense of control/security, then bombed the fuck out of them the next day. I'm not saying that this is some 5D chess master gambit from Trump at all and occam's razor is usually undefeated, but it just seems really odd. Could he be trying to provoke public unrest from democrats to cause more riots? This just feels like it's done so bluntly, so anti-climatically, and so dismissively that it seems like meant to illicit some kind of reaction. For who or to what end I have no idea

Trump's handlers must be getting massive headaches knowing their latest puppet is kind of retarded.

 

[Rimanah]

Probably because Vivek really gives of the skeezy politician vibes, while Kash and Harmeet are more of the get it done lawyer types. More importantly, Kash (until recently) and Harmeet aren't massive fuck ups.

This. Never forget that Vivek funded AND defended Martin Shkreli, and said the DOJ should prosecute him for fraud since it’s a “victimless crime.” And his company pumped and dumped SIO gene therapies.
AND he claimed to be a “scientist” who “developed medicine,” when running for president, despite only holding a BA and JD, and only being an investor who’s company just bought other people’s patents that hadn’t yet been brought to market

Vivek is a sleeze ball who’d sell you up the river for a nickel. Him being a filthy pajeet only heightens the disgust, but it’s not the root issue. He’d be scum not matter his race.

 

[Puff]

Vivek is a sleeze ball who’d seek you up the river for a nickel. Him being a filthy pajeet only heightens the disgust, but it’s not the root issue. He’d be scum not matter his race.

No, he acts like scum BECAUSE he's Indian.

 

[The Secret Sauce]

I find it interesting that Vivek's always received the brunt of racial vitriol, even compared to other Indians. Kash, Usha and Harmeet don't receive nearly as much hate as him. Is there a reason for that?

IIRC, he was the catalyst for Elon's Christmas Day meltdown. He decided to shit on American sitcoms on Christmas Day apropos of nothing.

 

[The Big A]

All this just feels weird. Like if this was always the endgame goal here and they knew they were never going to prosecute anyone what was the point of hyping it up and even bringing it up to begin with? I could sort of get going for broke and saying anything to get elected, but why even bring it up after winning? Furthermore, why make it such a big deal and do that big binder PR thing a few months ago? There are a million and one ways to make this story die off - the Biden admin never even touched it for four years and the democrats just kind of shrugged their shoulders (and if the tables were turned most of MAGA would probably do it too if Trump never said a word about Epstein after November as long as he was making the political/economic changes they wanted). What I just don't get from a PR perspective is why, if they knew they weren't going to prosecute anyone from day one, why make this big PR deal about it and even mention it after you've won the election? And why end the whole thing like this?

It reminds me of how Trump negotiated with Iran, lulled them into a false sense of control/security, then bombed the fuck out of them the next day. I'm not saying that this is some 5D chess master gambit from Trump at all and occam's razor is usually undefeated, but it just seems really odd. Could he be trying to provoke public unrest from democrats to cause more riots? This just feels like it's done so bluntly, so anti-climatically, and so dismissively that it seems like meant to illicit some kind of reaction. For who or to what end I have no idea

Humiliation Ritual.

 

[Exegesis]

can someone actually explain what is wrong in this post besides the couple of typos? I take it that people are mad about me implying a support for China so they just shut down and negrate me

@Sneed Lurker I wanna hear your criticism come on