Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Gorton Colu]

Why does Rusty think that the opinions from hearsay by random people mean anything?

"I've talked to loads of people about my plights and they agree with me that my enemies must be destroyed. Make it so, judge. This is a democracy."

 

[Google.com]

I think Greers new legal tactic is making me think I'm having a stroke by filling the same bullshit complaint and point over and over again.

Can I sue for damages?

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

Why does Rusty think that the opinions from hearsay by random people mean anything?

"I've talked to loads of people about my plights and they agree with me that my enemies must be destroyed. Make it so, judge. This is a democracy."

Strictly speaking he's not even wrong
The likelihood of this being accepted as perfectly valid by the judge is greater than 0
If judges were genuinely reasonable, i.e. "consider the facts and nothing but the facts", then they would hardly get into the position of a judge in a democracy

 

[Harvey Danger]

Time for another round of Checking Greer's Bad Citations!



All right, let's see what's so bothersome.

Any attorney or other person admitted to conduct cases in any court of the United States or any Territory thereof who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred because of such conduct.

Bizarrely, this is not a bad cite, because it does apply here. However, it is a classic case Russ getting the violating party backwards. At best, with the most charitable interpretation allowed by a tard guard, it's the pot calling the kettle a nigger.

 

[somevan]

Why are people so interested in this? It was just a little goof up.


No, lawyer child, it is you who should be sanctioned. Enjoy prison, Mr. Hardin.

 

[LiquidChrisRespecter]

Why does Rusty think that the opinions from hearsay by random people mean anything?

Presumably because that was good enough for Mommy 10th Circuit.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Another classic Greer maneuver. "Numerous other unnamed people agree that I am right, therefore I must be right!"

"Expert witnesses? At this time in the suit, at this point in discovery, in this part of the motion, localized entirely within your social circle?!?"
"Yes!"
"...may I depose them?"
"...No!"

 

[FamicomGorby]

Why does Rusty think that the opinions from hearsay by random people mean anything?

"I've talked to loads of people about my plights and they agree with me that my enemies must be destroyed. Make it so, judge. This is a democracy."

He told his imaginary lawyer friend Ken about it and they agreed with him. It's easier for made up people to validate his insane ideas since Greer has no friends to actually talk to.

So now that the thread is unlocked, can we get a poll for if Greer will pay the sanctions by the 30th? Will the judge just wag his finger at him when he doesn't?

 

[UselessRubberKeyboard]

Presumably because that was good enough for Mommy 10th Circuit.

Let’s hope those people that absolutely totally thought Greee was in the right are eager to testify. Hopefully they won’t die between time, like poor Steve did.

As always, Russ believes that anything other than a ‘no’ when he’s rambling his bullshit at people means they support him and that he’s right.

Do we get to drink when we get a new “what s/he did to me”? It worked so well against Taylor Swift, Ariana Grande, that poor girl from Orem and the Olive Garden prostitute, I’m sure the “what s/he did to me” accusation will work again.

The only thing to come from this legal nightmare is proof that judges are as impartial and law-focused as Russ is a hot stud.

 

[Post Reply]

.... okay? Bold strategy

I HAVE EXPLAINED THE REASONS, PRAY I DON'T EXPLAIN THEM ANY FURTHER.

 

[Terrifik]

Sorry firelord for efc 343.

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

Russ, you ignorant sped, everyone knows that the rule of three only works in celebrity deaths and movies. If you really wanted the judge (suffah judge) to sincerely hear your plight then you should've used FOUR "awful"s.

Never mind that the meeting you just HAD to attend was one you were told not to come to and was told very nicely to fuck off at. Never never mind that it's most likely that you were afraid of the judge telling you to get your stupid ass to court rather than go bug some city council about them just giving you someone else's land. Never never never mind that we awful, awful, awful peopl who hide like cowards they are (HOW THE FUCK DO YOU FUCK UP "there" WITH "they are" YOU STUPID BASTARD?!) on Kiwi Farms are not Null so what the hell does a judge care about a third party who's not even involved in the case do.

 

[obsdj]

It really is the little things. Like Hardin omitting two of Greer's "awful"s for brevity.

Oh man. Side quest. Prostitution-related side quest.



This is where the judges' noses are really being rubbed in the pee-stained carpet though:

 

[Pedophobe]

Is this the first known use of "side quest" in a federal court filing?

Will we get "love quest" next?

 

[StinkySnack]

Russ, you ignorant sped, everyone knows that the rule of three only works in celebrity deaths and movies. If you really wanted the judge (suffah judge) to sincerely hear your plight then you should've used FOUR "awful"s.
Wyświetl załącznik 7559794
Never mind that the meeting you just HAD to attend was one you were told not to come to and was told very nicely to fuck off at. Never never mind that it's most likely that you were afraid of the judge telling you to get your stupid ass to court rather than go bug some city council about them just giving you someone else's land. Never never never mind that we awful, awful, awful peopl who hide like cowards they are (HOW THE FUCK DO YOU FUCK UP "there" WITH "they are" YOU STUPID BASTARD?!) on Kiwi Farms are not Null so what the hell does a judge care about a third party who's not even involved in the case do.

Not much of a fuckup actually. I don't think he meant to say "the cowards there on Kiwi Farms" but rather "the cowards they are, on Kiwi Farms". He missed a comma.

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

"It's that damn Kiwi Farms and that damn Moon that is not allowing me to litigate my own suit that I refuse to litigate!"

"Sure, maybe I "lied" when I said there was an emergency to prevent me from attending the hearing and maybe there were a few other half truths but all of those were SINCERE goofs! The Supreme Court has ruled that oopsie-doodles can be repaired through mulligans (a golf term that means do it again). Greee moves to have the court award plaintiff $10,000 in statutory harm damages and put THE HARDSHIP into the penis explosion chamber and explode his penis immediately!"

And The Hardship responds Greee Greeeeeeeing.

I legit lol'd.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Caught Hardin in a lie.


Sure you do, buddy boy.



Then maybe the judges should stop being tard guarding little bitches and actually slap the retard. They brought this on themselves. Suffah, judiciary.

I do like how Hardin reminds the court of where the uncontested facts stand right now. The judges clearly need the Cliff's Notes for non-autists; but it also means the defense should automatically win.

Mr. Greer’s “opposition” is most notable for what it concedes. Perhaps most notably, Mr. Greer does not claim he truly had an “emergency” that would have prevented his attendance at the May 6, 2025 hearing, despite his statements to that effect at ECF No. 276, and Mr. Greer does not dispute Defendants’ assertions that he was not paying attention at the telephonic hearing that day because he was busy emailing City officials about prostitution. ECF No. 337 at 3. Mr. Greer similarly does not dispute that the proper remedy for any Rule 11 violation is dismissal.

...And because Mr. Greer has failed to contest the relevant facts or law, this Court should simply grant the relief Defendants seek.

Of course, this being clown world, "should" and "automatic" don't matter to a court that already ignores "shall" and "must".

 

[Napoleon III]

Hardin has a lot of citations in his filing I think it is more than he would normally have. Which is one thing you'd do if you were trying to make this resistant to appeals.

Also Hardin's filing is only for lying the court about the emergency. We still have the motion for dismissal for failing to produce documents(the Restraining order on Null Greer says he had). I don't think the Steve Taylor thing needs a motion.

Good to see Hardin is covering all his bases.

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

Not much of a fuckup actually. I don't think he meant to say "the cowards there on Kiwi Farms" but rather "the cowards they are, on Kiwi Farms". He missed a comma.

No, spelling child. You have been instructed many times that Greer is a drooling imbecile who misspells his own name and is capable of screw ups even worse. Enjoy grammar.

 

[Swole McPole]

"Prostitution-related side quest" is my favorite bit of Hardin writing so far. But really, I think the case is the side quest for Greer and prostitution is the main storyline.

As I'm reading Hardin's filing, my mind inevitably turned to Rekieta and his degree in creative writing. I bet Mr Hardin doesn't have a degree in creative writing, yet his motions before the court are as creative and as compelling a read as any fiction. I see a new one has appeared and my heart leaps into my mouth, in exactly the same way that the readers of Dickens or Twain must have done when they saw that the newspaper contained the latest edition of his story.

And when I sit down to read, he takes me through the emotional gamut. Anger at Greer. Sympathy for Null. Irritation at the judges for their failures to act. And a peculiar sort of pride -- in Matthew, and his Don Quixote-like attacks on the horrible little hunchback who is the source of all of this annoyance.

As for Greer himself, no outcome would be too terrible for this obnoxious little specimen of a man. They should bring back hanging, drawing and quartering -- but even that wouldn't be adequate for this horrible little shit stain.

Why does Rusty think that the opinions from hearsay by random people mean anything?

This is obviously what they taught in Greer's paralegal school.

The standard of evidence for the court is this: complain to your mates about your opponents behaviour. Then you can report what you believe your mates tell you they think about your plights to the judge. This is the strongest evidentiary basis for a winning case in the Utah courts.

See: Osmond and Osmond - The Mormon Law of Evidence