[SPREGULATION] Phil's possibly committed fraud, and not just with SSDI. - This is pretty sickening if true.

Isn't it possible that Phil knows Nick's ssn? With that all he would really need to do is apply for a card in his name online, fudge some numbers, and wait for the card in the mail.
 
As much as the evidence is purely circumstantial, I think it's too much of a coincidence for this not to be Phil's work. I can easily see someone more intelligent than him (Jordan maybe?) putting this idea in his head.

Jordan also has a sibling in a similar predicament as Phil's sibling. IIRC, he/she was born with the syndrome that entails a person having a very tiny head. I think it's called Microcephaly or something. People with that disorder also need a lot of medical care and are most likely in a facility that has POA over them as well.
 
I'm almost 100% positive he got a big lump sum back payment. He hired an actual attorney to get him his disability after it had failed a few times, and that was his payout from when he had started the process to approval.

Entire text of the ruling in question. (Other than the shit Phil blocked out. He lacks the intelligence to fake the rest of it, though.)

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

After careful consideration of the entire record, I make the following findings:

1. The claimant’s date last insured is December 31, 2014.

2. There is no evidence of substantial gainful activity since August 31, 2010, the alleged onset date (20 CFR 404.1520(b), 404.1571 et seq., 416.920(b) and 416.971 et seq.).

There is no evidence that the claimant has engaged in substantial gainful activity at any time relevant to her applications for benefits (see, Exhibits 3D-8D, 10D-12D, 2E & 3E and hearing testimony). Therefore, a finding of disability is not precluded on the basis of work activity.

3. The claimant has the following severe impairments: a depressive disorder, an anxiety disorder, and a personality disorder (20 CFR 404.1520(c) and 416.920(c)).

The claimant has alleged disability on the basis of autism/Asperger’s syndrome, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a generalized anxiety disorder, a dissociative disorder, a personality disorder and fibromyalgia. She reported that her symptoms include suicidal ideation, difficulty interacting with others, difficulty sleeping, memory problems and impaired concentration. As a result of her symptoms, the claimant has become homeless and has difficulty performing tasks, including personal care. The claimant also testified that she is transgender woman who is transitioning from a man (see, Exhibits ?E, 6E, 10E, 11E & 15E and hearing testimony).

As will be discussed below, the findings reported in the claimant’s medical records indicate that the above impairments have more than a minimal effect on her ability to work. I therefore find that the claimant’s impairments are “severe.”

4. The severity of the claimant’s impairments meets the criteria of Section 12.06 of the Listing of Impairments found at 20 CFR Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1 (20 CFR 404.1520(d), 404.1525, 416.920(d) and 416.925).

According to the claimant’s medical records, she legally changed her name after determining that she wanted to transition from male to female and was placed on a hormone regimen by her physician in May 2010 (Exhibit 1F/36). Thereafter, during a subsequent visit to the Mazzoni Center in June 2011, the claimant requested a referral for psychiatric treatment as she was

[. . .]

August 2013, she presented to the emergency room shortly thereafter, with suicidal ideation. Her emergency room physician suggested that the claimant’s current symptoms may have been precipitated by the new medication and her medication was stopped (Exhibit 13F/4).

At the hearing, the medical expert testified that he had reviewed the record, including the evidence of persistent depression, uncontrolled with psychotropic medication, and of a personality disorder, with difficulty functioning on a day-to-day basis. Dr. Tanenhaus specifically noted that the record describes a sleep disturbance, psychomotor agitation, feelings of worthlessness and difficulty concentrating, as contemplated under the “paragraph A” criteria of Section 12.04. He further testified that the record describes evidence of persistent disturbances of mood or affect and intense and unstable interpersonal relationships, as contemplated under the “paragraph B” criteria of both Section 12.04 and Section 12.08. In addition, in Dr. Tanenhaus’ opinion, the “paragraph B” criteria of both Section 12.04 and Section 12.08 are satisfied because the record indicates that the claimant’s impairments cause a mild restriction in activities of daily living, marked difficulties in maintaining social functioning, marked difficulties in maintaining concentration, persistence or pace, and no episodes of decompensation of extended duration.

I accept his testimony and accord it great weight, as it was based upon a review of the record in its entirety and is supported by the underlying medical evidence of record. Taking into consideration the opinion of the medical expert and the record as a whole, I find that the claimant suffers from a Listing level affective disorder that meets the criteria of Section 12.04 and from a Listing level personality disorder that meets the criteria of Section 12.08.

In making these findings, I have also considered other opinion evidence in accordance with the requirements of 20 CFR 404.1527 and 416.927 and SSRs 96-2p, 96-6p and 06-3p. I give some

[. . .]

I have also considered all symptoms and the [. . .] consistent with the objective medical evidence and other evidence, based on the [. . .] 20 CFR 404.1529 and 416.929 and SSRs 96-4p and 96-7p. After considering the evidence of record, I find that the claimant’s medically determinable impairments could reasonably be expected to produce the alleged symptoms, and that the claimant’s statements concerning the intensity, persistence and limiting effects of these symptoms are generally credible.

5. The claimant has been under a disability as defined in the Social Security Act since August 31, 2010, the alleged onset date of disability (20 CFR 404.1520(d) and 416.920(d)).

DECISION


Based on the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits filed on June 27, 2011, the claimant has been disabled under sections 216(i) and 223(d) of the Social Security Act since August 31, 2010.

Based on the application for supplemental security income protectively filed on February 16, 2013, the claimant has been disabled under section 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act since August 31, 2010.

The component of the Social Security Administration responsible for authorizing supplemental security income will advise the claimant regarding the nondisability requirements for these payments and, if the claimant is eligible, the amount and the months for which payment will be made.

Medical improvement is expected with appropriate treatment. Consequently, a continuing disability review is recommended in 24 months.

/sneed/
Richard P. Laverdure
Administrative Law Judge

November 10, 2014
Date
 
Entire text of the ruling in question. (Other than the shit Phil blocked out. He lacks the intelligence to fake the rest of it, though.)

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

After careful consideration of the entire record, I make the following findings:

1. The claimant’s date last insured is December 31, 2014.

2. There is no evidence of substantial gainful activity since August 31, 2010, the alleged onset date (20 CFR 404.1520(b), 404.1571 et seq., 416.920(b) and 416.971 et seq.).

There is no evidence that the claimant has engaged in substantial gainful activity at any time relevant to her applications for benefits (see, Exhibits 3D-8D, 10D-12D, 2E & 3E and hearing testimony). Therefore, a finding of disability is not precluded on the basis of work activity.

3. The claimant has the following severe impairments: a depressive disorder, an anxiety disorder, and a personality disorder (20 CFR 404.1520(c) and 416.920(c)).

The claimant has alleged disability on the basis of autism/Asperger’s syndrome, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a generalized anxiety disorder, a dissociative disorder, a personality disorder and fibromyalgia. She reported that her symptoms include suicidal ideation, difficulty interacting with others, difficulty sleeping, memory problems and impaired concentration. As a result of her symptoms, the claimant has become homeless and has difficulty performing tasks, including personal care. The claimant also testified that she is transgender woman who is transitioning from a man (see, Exhibits ?E, 6E, 10E, 11E & 15E and hearing testimony).

As will be discussed below, the findings reported in the claimant’s medical records indicate that the above impairments have more than a minimal effect on her ability to work. I therefore find that the claimant’s impairments are “severe.”

4. The severity of the claimant’s impairments meets the criteria of Section 12.06 of the Listing of Impairments found at 20 CFR Part 404, Subpart P, Appendix 1 (20 CFR 404.1520(d), 404.1525, 416.920(d) and 416.925).

According to the claimant’s medical records, she legally changed her name after determining that she wanted to transition from male to female and was placed on a hormone regimen by her physician in May 2010 (Exhibit 1F/36). Thereafter, during a subsequent visit to the Mazzoni Center in June 2011, the claimant requested a referral for psychiatric treatment as she was

[. . .]

August 2013, she presented to the emergency room shortly thereafter, with suicidal ideation. Her emergency room physician suggested that the claimant’s current symptoms may have been precipitated by the new medication and her medication was stopped (Exhibit 13F/4).

At the hearing, the medical expert testified that he had reviewed the record, including the evidence of persistent depression, uncontrolled with psychotropic medication, and of a personality disorder, with difficulty functioning on a day-to-day basis. Dr. Tanenhaus specifically noted that the record describes a sleep disturbance, psychomotor agitation, feelings of worthlessness and difficulty concentrating, as contemplated under the “paragraph A” criteria of Section 12.04. He further testified that the record describes evidence of persistent disturbances of mood or affect and intense and unstable interpersonal relationships, as contemplated under the “paragraph B” criteria of both Section 12.04 and Section 12.08. In addition, in Dr. Tanenhaus’ opinion, the “paragraph B” criteria of both Section 12.04 and Section 12.08 are satisfied because the record indicates that the claimant’s impairments cause a mild restriction in activities of daily living, marked difficulties in maintaining social functioning, marked difficulties in maintaining concentration, persistence or pace, and no episodes of decompensation of extended duration.

I accept his testimony and accord it great weight, as it was based upon a review of the record in its entirety and is supported by the underlying medical evidence of record. Taking into consideration the opinion of the medical expert and the record as a whole, I find that the claimant suffers from a Listing level affective disorder that meets the criteria of Section 12.04 and from a Listing level personality disorder that meets the criteria of Section 12.08.

In making these findings, I have also considered other opinion evidence in accordance with the requirements of 20 CFR 404.1527 and 416.927 and SSRs 96-2p, 96-6p and 06-3p. I give some

[. . .]

I have also considered all symptoms and the [. . .] consistent with the objective medical evidence and other evidence, based on the [. . .] 20 CFR 404.1529 and 416.929 and SSRs 96-4p and 96-7p. After considering the evidence of record, I find that the claimant’s medically determinable impairments could reasonably be expected to produce the alleged symptoms, and that the claimant’s statements concerning the intensity, persistence and limiting effects of these symptoms are generally credible.

5. The claimant has been under a disability as defined in the Social Security Act since August 31, 2010, the alleged onset date of disability (20 CFR 404.1520(d) and 416.920(d)).

DECISION


Based on the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits filed on June 27, 2011, the claimant has been disabled under sections 216(i) and 223(d) of the Social Security Act since August 31, 2010.

Based on the application for supplemental security income protectively filed on February 16, 2013, the claimant has been disabled under section 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act since August 31, 2010.

The component of the Social Security Administration responsible for authorizing supplemental security income will advise the claimant regarding the nondisability requirements for these payments and, if the claimant is eligible, the amount and the months for which payment will be made.

Medical improvement is expected with appropriate treatment. Consequently, a continuing disability review is recommended in 24 months.

/sneed/
Richard P. Laverdure
Administrative Law Judge

November 10, 2014
Date


Did we ever find out the results of his review?
 
Let's say Phil did get credit cards in his brothers name. In that case, would any debt be dumped on Nick or on the family in general? If he's technically legally incompetent but his name is attached to the card, would the responsibility fall to whoever his legal guardian (or executor or whatever the correct term is)?

I'm wondering what the ramifications are since we know Phil is garbage who skirts responsibility and who has no problem making everyone else's lives harder for his sake.

one thing to keep in mind when you speculate about "is the caregiver of nick in on it" is that whomever his legal guardian is, the burden of the debt is on them as nick's legal guardian, as it also gives them power of attorney over nick's affairs. doesn't make sense to willingly be part of a scam like this.

This would ultimately amount to ID theft and fraud, so if Philthy did do something so inhumane, he and whomever he was working with would be responsible. I agree that this isn't something spuds devised himself as others have speculated, but I really doubt the brother's wrangler/care home would have been involved. Primarily since such persons would be in the NE United States. And while we can all see that this is something that taters would be capable of and willing to do, he isn't smart enough to think of this entirely on his own, which would necessitate that the wrangler/care home worker located Phil and encouraged him to do this.

While that might have been possible if Phil were still close to home, I very much doubt that someone who would like to orchestrate such a scheme would do so, as they have no way of profiting from this without a paper trail. Were Phil still in the NE, an exchange of cash/goods could occur in person and enable them to leave no proof of their involvement and therefore leave them with no liability, but there would have to be wire transfers/e-payments/shipping involved which could be traced.

Sure, there's the deep web and all, but do you think that Phil, who's too dumb to understand that having a penis means he's a boy, is smart enough to even DOWNLOAD Tor?
 
I'm almost 100% positive he got a big lump sum back payment. He hired an actual attorney to get him his disability after it had failed a few times, and that was his payout from when he had started the process to approval.
This is a little late, but when you're approved for disability, you get a lump sum starting from the date you became disabled. They generally declare you disabled around the point where you get your first diagnoses, when it comes to mental disability. I got about $10k when I was approved. The idea if you're supposed to use the money to get set up... get your own apartment, furnish it, maybe pay off some bill. Phil blew it all on shitty tattoos and cheese.
 
This is a little late, but when you're approved for disability, you get a lump sum starting from the date you became disabled. They generally declare you disabled around the point where you get your first diagnoses, when it comes to mental disability. I got about $10k when I was approved. The idea if you're supposed to use the money to get set up... get your own apartment, furnish it, maybe pay off some bill. Phil blew it all on shitty tattoos and cheese.

Not in all cases. I had a pal who was disabled from birth, and when they finally swallowed their arrogance and signed up, they got like... I dunno, like $150 or something? I'll have to ask sometime. I remember it was like this really tiny amount.
 
Not in all cases. I had a pal who was disabled from birth, and when they finally swallowed their arrogance and signed up, they got like... I dunno, like $150 or something? I'll have to ask sometime. I remember it was like this really tiny amount.
It's often from the date of first application, which if you're very clearly disabled, will be the one that's approved.
 
Is this like a keyser soze moment where in the end it turns out Phil pulled off a massive heist, and isn't nearly as exceptional as we thought?

Phil's no Moriarty. Just a human cockroach with no morals. If this is true, I'd love to see KF press this into an actual federal investigation and see Phil end up in a perp walk like Sick Nick did.
 
Another social justice cunt scamming people out of money while touting the virtues of socialism?

What a fucking shocker. Never heard of that before.

Seriously, I hope Phil gets a fucking 24-volume Special Edition of the book thrown at him
 
I agree with the suggestion that Phil must have had help - he really is not a smart man, and to both carry this out and conceal it would require assistance.

I can certainly see Phil having no problem whatsoever with potentially screwing his brother over. I get the impression that he really resents him. He accuses his father of a campaign of physical, emotional and sexual abuse and his mother of being deliberately in on it, but he barely mentions his brother at all. I recall the last mention was in his most recent retcon of his history, when he simply referred to himself as the "more intelligent" of the two brothers. No mention of Nick's severe disability. Most of his autobiographies don't mention Nick at all. While he invented his parental issues, it seems that his real issue is with his brother - my guess, because he resents the fact that his parents had to pay more attention to Nick. This in turn led to the attention-seeking lost soul we see today.
 
Here's the thing about obvious criminal activity: Only complete fucking morons and the desperate do it. Phil is always one and often both
 
lol speak for yourself I've never seen a life I couldn't make worse
Shine on, you beautiful blight on humanity.
I agree with the suggestion that Phil must have had help - he really is not a smart man, and to both carry this out and conceal it would require assistance.
Likely, but the alternative isn't out of the question.
Guy's a mongoloid, no question, but you'd be amazed by how inventive lazy shitheads can be, and Phil has always had a knack for finding new ways to suck people dry.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole