- Dołączono
- 28 Maj 2024
His weak fists aren't enough, he should start using a hammerNick has fresh bruises on his face ( likely from hitting himself in the head again ) and his eyes are starting to sink in like a meth addict.
Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
His weak fists aren't enough, he should start using a hammerNick has fresh bruises on his face ( likely from hitting himself in the head again ) and his eyes are starting to sink in like a meth addict.
Aaron blathered about it on today's show. Here's the clip:Nanny Issue (from current stream):
I'm taking notes in real time and behind in the thread. This is getting crazy. It needs to be clipped.
I'm someone who's been around these things, Junkies only get their kids taken away if they keep being junkies. You get told by the CPS workers to sort your shit now or get the long dick of Uncle Sam straight into your prostate.It’s a shame people aren’t more knowledgeable about CPS, because it gives breathing space to Nick’s lies.
“Well, if she REALLY had cocaine in her system, there’s no way they’d let her back in their care! Nick must be right!”
They don’t realize that taking the kids away permanently is always the last solution and not something they’d do even if there was one incontrovertible positive drug test.
Why did CPS put him through the wringer in the first place? Geez, could it be because the daughter tested positive for cocaine? They sure as fuck don’t remove kids temporarily because some drugs were found.
He is counting on her not being able to afford to sue.This nigger is trying to collect lawsuits like they’re gym badges or something. Why the fuck would you even bring the nanny up in a time like this?
She's working for an attorney or a law firm. If she is any good, why wouldn't they go after him, even if it is pro bono?He is counting on her not being able to afford to sue.
When he first mentioned having stories about her he didn't say it in a way that implied she gave his kids alcohol. That would be rage inducing to any normal parent but he said it in his usual "it's funny and weird" kind of way. He's definitely reconning the nanny stuff for something only his wetbrain currently knows. I don't think he realizes how poorly it reflects on him. You "work" from home and your wife stays at home too. How negligent do you have to be to miss your nanny giving your kids alcohol.Sounds to me like he's getting ahead of something. Maybe Nanny has hinted at going public?
>NickCan anyone actually confirm if the Nanny actually had a CHIPS report against her? Even if she did, why would Nick hire a nanny that had a legal record of potential child abuse?
Cute. Did he try to bring her into the Qover, too?
Please take some of your precious and limited time to take this probably unwinnable case for free, teehee.She's working for an attorney or a law firm. If she is any good, why wouldn't they go after him, even if it is pro bono?
Yes… Nick’s in-laws are in such a dire need of things to do, that they got together with that no-good PRUDE pastor and cooked up a conspiracy to get them in their care.https://youtube.com/watch?v=OkZ8nX2oUEI
Am I mishearing, or is he quite literally suggesting that this was all part of a grand conspiracy to place his children in foster care?
I really want Nick to elaborate.https://youtube.com/watch?v=OkZ8nX2oUEI
Am I mishearing, or is he quite literally suggesting that this was all part of a grand conspiracy to place his children in foster care?
We will have to wait and see what happens. She might have seen first hand that lawsuits are emotionally draining and the firm could be advising her since you aren’t being fired or losing job opportunities due to it, it really isn’t worth drawing attention to it by suing, maybe?She's working for an attorney or a law firm. If she is any good, why wouldn't they go after him, even if it is pro bono?
The last 10 seconds of this. "Prove it. HOW?"https://youtube.com/watch?v=OkZ8nX2oUEI
Am I mishearing, or is he quite literally suggesting that this was all part of a grand conspiracy to place his children in foster care?
The Dabbleverse cope is because the officer said he watched Aaron's show after getting other reports that's the same as Aaron snitching.WTF does Aaron have to do with this? I mean other than MAPton's weird obsession with him. Aaron wasn't talked to prior to the arrest by authorities. Certainly, Aaron is named in the warrant, but it was as the other half of the Qover (along with April). The supplemental doesn't include Aaron either, and Aaron's own report is he was talked to by police after the arrest. I know Nick has the "Aaron snitched!" crusade going on, and perhaps he did after the arrest (well ok, he sang like a bird, certainly on the Kino Casino). But he wasn't part of the initial investigation and reporting the led up to the arrest.
I think Skelly only said "the nanny." He would deny that he referred to any specific nanny.She's working for an attorney or a law firm. If she is any good, why wouldn't they go after him, even if it is pro bono?