US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
Here's the part that really perplexes me, he wins when you get butthurt aginst him, So Boasberg is going to get so badly butthurt he's going to make a mistake that eventually kills the legtimacy of the Judical system aka Trump's playbook from 2016 on. But everyone thinks they are the special one. Boasberg is doing Trump's bidding through getting butthurt.
The hate the Establishment(which includes these judges) have for Trump blinds them to anything else. So like children they do whatever they can to get back at him. Unlike children who scream, throw things, and hit people, they try to use their 'smarts' to beat him. What they fail to see is their methods and the stances they take to oppose him are onerous to the everyday man(who are still the majority of the country). So they end up doing more damage to themselves and their agenda than to Trump.
 
Every ceasefire will always be violated forever. Especially when Muslims are involved. They literally see lying to infidels as a holy duty and feel empowered to do so.
Cease-fires have to be negotiated for like a day in advance, because while we like to think we have so much modern technology, you really can't expect to get that message across to all troops in like a few hours. And this is talking about modern, western militaries. Think about how it is for these 2nd world countries.

And then there is obviously the need for some people in the military to just say fuck it, and they want to deliver the final blows. When Finland and the Soviet Union agreed on a truce in 1944, they basically allowed like a 24h period from the day when the truce was signed for all the troops in the field to get the message. Even still, some Soviet units kept on shelling the Finnish positions until the day after. It had nothing to do with the lack of a message about a truce coming through, their high command (or some local commander, who knows) just wanted to keep on giving. In those instances, it takes immense mental strength to hold your ground and hope that the opposition eventually grows up. Which, I guess, will be extremely hard when we have two poop-nigger countries going at it. One of them muslims, dear God.
 
Good Old Judge Boasberg, the Jew whose trying to bring all those gangsters back from El Salvador and whose holding Trump in contempt, has now issued a order that hides the names and identities of all of the people involved in the lawsuit.

He terms is that by allowing the media to know who the plaintiffs are they now open to "hostile and retributive actions by people with ill intentions. Thus for their and their families safety we must now conceal their personal identities"
And than they wonder why the idea of suspending Habeas Corpus is being floated around.
 
The “woke right” discourse has now reached the 90’s Liberalism stage, as expected.

“You say you want whites to establish an ethnic identity and sit at the table with the other ethnic special interests instead of abolishing DEI/AA and retvrning to a racial colorblind meritocracy? Woke.”

And it’s like, yeah sure I’d obviously prefer a meritocratic outcome over ethnic position jockeying, but there’s absolutely no path to get us there that doesn’t involve outrageous levels of chimpouts and mass violence. Ending DEI/AA and not recapturing the tens of millions of unearned sinecures is about as pointless as securing the border without mass deportations.

We have about ten years to do something about this before demographics makes the country majority-minority and the window closes forever. It took subversive elements the better part of 50 to slowly boil society to this point; we can’t end DEI/AA and let the current beneficiaries flush out of the system “naturally” in the time frame we have left. And forcing them out obviously immediately collapses the country into a firebomb.

Which makes it simple: establish a firm racial identity and join in the ethnic power battles while slowly rolling back the post-CRA regime - or do nothing, quickly become a hated minority, and watch as all the other ethnic minorities repeatedly vote to steal your shit like in South Africa. Easy choice, if not a happy one.
 
Good Old Judge Boasberg, the Jew whose trying to bring all those gangsters back from El Salvador and whose holding Trump in contempt, has now issued a order that hides the names and identities of all of the people involved in the lawsuit.
You might have to take my word for it, but even federal judges have personally expressed to me that they're getting pissed off at the Supreme Court. Roberts's black robe has turned yellow because of how cowardly he is. The refusal to rule on these issues and rein in radical judges like Boasberg is going to cause a constitutional crisis.

And when I say "radical," I don't mean politically. I mean that there's a class of people like Boasberg who have no idea how equity jurisprudence works. He believes he is God—he can speak a word and the results come into existence. But equity (injunctions) only works if you can actually enforce your rulings. Boasberg believes that if he said "let there be light" from the bench, then light would come into existence. It's these types of people that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic. Remember, it wasn't Julius Caesar who started the Roman civil war, it was the entrenched political elites in Rome who went so over-the=top to destroy him that started it.
 
India-Pakistan as the flashpoint for WWIII
>Russia-Ukraine is going to start WW3
>Israel-Palestine is going to start WW3
>India-Pakistan is going to start WW3


Why would India and Pakistan starting a war over a border dispute in some remote part of the third world escalate into WW3? Doesn't make sense to me given the US afaik is against both India and Pakistan to varying degrees for different reasons.
 
>Russia-Ukraine is going to start WW3
>Israel-Palestine is going to start WW3
>India-Pakistan is going to start WW3


Why would India and Pakistan starting a war over a border dispute in some remote part of the third world escalate into WW3? Doesn't make sense to me given the US afaik is against both India and Pakistan to varying degrees for different reasons.
Because India and Pakistan both have nuclear weapons and China has a direct interest in the situation (also nuclear armed) as they, too, have land claims in Kashmir. It's a far more serious situation than Ukraine-Russia or Israel-Palestine.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole