Używasz przestarzałej przeglądarki. Może ona nieprawidłowo wyświetlać tę lub inne strony. Powinieneś zaktualizować przeglądarkę lub użyć alternatywnej przeglądarki.
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Greer v. Moon
2:20-cv-00647— District Court, D. Utah
Docket No.
2:20-cv-00647
Court
District Court, D. Utah
Filed
15 Wrz 2020
Terminated
22 Kwi 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:0501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
6 Sie 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 127)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
6 Sie 2024
Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113
15 Maj 2024
ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112
28 Kwi 2024
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111
25 Kwi 2024
Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024)
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
GREER v. MOON
3:24-cv-00122— District Court, N.D. Florida
Docket No.
3:24-cv-00122
Court
District Court, N.D. Florida
Filed
19 Mar 2024
Terminated
10 Cze 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
16 Paź 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 155)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
16 Paź 2024
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132
15 Paź 2024
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024)
AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024)
Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)
Greer v. Moon
2:24-cv-00421— District Court, D. Utah
Docket No.
2:24-cv-00421
Court
District Court, D. Utah
Filed
10 Cze 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:0501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
Plaintiff
Last Filing
21 Cze 2026
Parties (4)
Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 525)
#
Date
Description
Filing
486
21 Cze 2026
Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026)
Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026)
Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026)
RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj)
RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj)
Greer v. Moon
21-4128— Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Docket No.
21-4128
Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Filed
26 Paź 2021
Terminated
15 Paź 2023
Nature of Suit
3820 Copyright
Last Filing
15 Cze 2026
Recent Filings
#
Date
Description
Filing
10010756599
19 Paź 2022
[10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
But Josh has been the defendant this whole time (as well as KF, a website). I feel like that would've gone over well if he just didn't mention Josh. "Your honor he's adding new people and asking us for discovery about them but he hasn't even said what discoverable information they have.". If this is an obvious assumption (and as a layman IMO it is) in court why did he mention Josh at all?
Being a defendant and a discovery target aren't the same thing. There's a whole process for disposition, even if you're the defendant. Greer is so fucking stupid he didn't realize he needs to depose Null.
Was going to come back and say that I got in on my browser (over tor no less) but you are already aware. Also I am suing you for contributory copyright infringement for giving me trauma lumps by saying there was a 50 person limit.
So now the thread's cooled down a bit, my favourite parts:
Russ being asked why he can't produce his own documents, him whining he doesn't know how but somehow still thinking he can get away with commanding Mr Hardin to go and find them despite being compelled to produce them
Russ slurring some conspiracy theory about "James Jorton" wiretapping him with Mr Hardin's permission in order to request court documents he has referenced in public filings
An audible notification pinging on Shitlips' phone and him just abruptly stopping in the middle of a sentence to check it
Russtard straight up admitting he can absolutely pay his filings fees but he doesn't see why he should because "it's irrelevant to copyright". You could hear the trauma lumps developing in real time as the Magistrate told him to pay up in 30 days or him and his case can fuck off.
I'm surprised that Hardin doesn't bring up to the Judge that Greer is a qualified paralegal, as I doubt the Judge realises this.
I also predict that Greer will not pay the filing fee, as he hopes that closing the case will mean that they don't go forward with further sanctions on him.
I disagree with the judge regarding the individuals with discoverable information. There is no way that Josh or Kiwifarms (A website) would have any inherent knowledge that the two users here have discoverable information. I think that was a very faulty conclusion on the judge's part.
Unless i am mistaken (please do correct me) Greer is pretty fucked because he has to provide a restraining order that doesn't exist to the court, withing 14 days and in 3 week hardin can come back to Benett, tell him that russtard didn't do his part and possibly get the case tossed?
depending on whether or not Russhole understood Judge Bennett's clear instructions to send said restraining order to Hardin marked "Confidential Attorney's Eyes Only" as per the SPO that Russhole doesn't quite have the gist of.
There is absolutely no way we are getting that (presuming rusty files anything). Hardin would have to have legitimate brain damage to file it publicly even if russ doesn't label it properly.
In the future when Hardin gets an opposing lawyer to write out a panic induced, "I know of absolutely nobody else on Earth with relevant discoverable information" document he needs to include an, "including all the people you think it would be obvious have such information" clause.
Unless i am mistaken (please do correct me) Greer is pretty fucked because he has to provide a restraining order that doesn't exist to the court, withing 14 days and in 3 week hardin can come back to Benett, tell him that russtard didn't do his part and possibly get the case tossed?
This thread is a stunning indictment of the collective reading comprehension of this website.
Even if you just think about it with basic logic: Why would the judge, wholly aware that there is no restraining order, then order Russ to produce a restraining order?