Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) 1 2 3
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
But Josh has been the defendant this whole time (as well as KF, a website). I feel like that would've gone over well if he just didn't mention Josh. "Your honor he's adding new people and asking us for discovery about them but he hasn't even said what discoverable information they have.". If this is an obvious assumption (and as a layman IMO it is) in court why did he mention Josh at all?
Being a defendant and a discovery target aren't the same thing. There's a whole process for disposition, even if you're the defendant. Greer is so fucking stupid he didn't realize he needs to depose Null.
 
Update: There does not appear to be a limit to the number of participants, and you can join from your browser.
Was going to come back and say that I got in on my browser (over tor no less) but you are already aware. Also I am suing you for contributory copyright infringement for giving me trauma lumps by saying there was a 50 person limit.
 
So now the thread's cooled down a bit, my favourite parts:

  • Russ being asked why he can't produce his own documents, him whining he doesn't know how but somehow still thinking he can get away with commanding Mr Hardin to go and find them despite being compelled to produce them
  • Russ slurring some conspiracy theory about "James Jorton" wiretapping him with Mr Hardin's permission in order to request court documents he has referenced in public filings
  • An audible notification pinging on Shitlips' phone and him just abruptly stopping in the middle of a sentence to check it
  • Russtard straight up admitting he can absolutely pay his filings fees but he doesn't see why he should because "it's irrelevant to copyright". You could hear the trauma lumps developing in real time as the Magistrate told him to pay up in 30 days or him and his case can fuck off.
 
It sounds like the hearing went very well, shame I couldn't listen to it, sounds like it was a laugh riot.

At this rate the whole case should be wrapped in another 5 years or so!
 
I disagree with the judge regarding the individuals with discoverable information. There is no way that Josh or Kiwifarms (A website) would have any inherent knowledge that the two users here have discoverable information. I think that was a very faulty conclusion on the judge's part.
 
Things at least seems to be moving forward.

Unless i am mistaken (please do correct me) Greer is pretty fucked because he has to provide a restraining order that doesn't exist to the court, withing 14 days and in 3 week hardin can come back to Benett, tell him that russtard didn't do his part and possibly get the case tossed?
 
depending on whether or not Russhole understood Judge Bennett's clear instructions to send said restraining order to Hardin marked "Confidential Attorney's Eyes Only" as per the SPO that Russhole doesn't quite have the gist of.
There is absolutely no way we are getting that (presuming rusty files anything). Hardin would have to have legitimate brain damage to file it publicly even if russ doesn't label it properly.
 
All Russ needs is to file a Motion To Pretend The Hearing Didn't Happen, that will get the case back on track for him.
 
In the future when Hardin gets an opposing lawyer to write out a panic induced, "I know of absolutely nobody else on Earth with relevant discoverable information" document he needs to include an, "including all the people you think it would be obvious have such information" clause.
 
Things at least seems to be moving forward.

Unless i am mistaken (please do correct me) Greer is pretty fucked because he has to provide a restraining order that doesn't exist to the court, withing 14 days and in 3 week hardin can come back to Benett, tell him that russtard didn't do his part and possibly get the case tossed?
Yeah I was confused as well, he's been asked to provide a restraining order that he admits to be a typo?
 
I fucking hate you. It's on this fucking page, bro
This thread is a stunning indictment of the collective reading comprehension of this website.

Even if you just think about it with basic logic: Why would the judge, wholly aware that there is no restraining order, then order Russ to produce a restraining order?
 
In case anyone missed it, here it is in meme format:
9t33mtb.webp
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole