Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
Any idea why Hardin did not press on this?
Removing IFP is huge, because russtoleum would have to pay the $402. Not anything else, immediately, but it's a huge step.

Court COULD charge for some things (the fees in costs and fees) but the real winner would be removing ECF from russ, but that's much harder to argue for.
 
So Russel has repeatedly lied or misled or never even asked or checked if he had living, willing witnesses and now he says he magically has new ones?
GettyImages-tlp604314.webp
Yes, child. :smug:
 
So Russ is looking at an immediate $1400 bill, unless he can swing a bonded stay with the District judge. I'm sure he's debating whether to not pay the $400 and end the case (as a face-saving excuse in his own mind), but he really needs to be hit with more sanctions to stop him once and for all. If he uses the filing fee as the exit strategy, can Josh file to recover ALL attorney's fees?
 
can someone explain this in english
Greer lost his IFP status and has to pay the court $400, otherwise the case is dismissed. Also, the case is stayed while the court decides whether to dismiss it anyway.

I may be wrong, but this is how I understood it.
 
The judge scheduled that for 1:00 PM, with nothing after, and it's over in an hour?

So he gets the rest of the afternoon off?

I picked the wrong job.
Three kids on the playground are having a discussion.

My dad is the fastest, one says, he is a truck driver and he can make the drive from Salt Lake City to Denver in 7 hours!

The second kid disagrees, his dad is the fastest, he is a police man and is involved in high speed chases all the time!

No no, says the third kid, my dad is the fastest. He is a public servant and works 9 to 5, but he arrives home at 12 every day!
 
The only point Hardin didn't seem to do well with was that rusty didn't say who had discoverable information. Specifically Jersh even though he's the defendant in the case. On it's face I would think you wouldn't have to point that out because it's obvious but until now I wrote it off as "must happen in boiler plate stuff you never hear about but rusty is just such a fuckup it's a problem". But now the judge is saying it's obvious. So which is it lawfags?
I was also confused a bit by Hardin on this argument, it does seem obvious that defendants wouldn't need to be listed. I can kind of follow if he's trying to say that they weren't even witnesses before, and now all of a sudden they are defendants after many years and the statute of limitations, and therefore this is all a bit desperate or improper from the Plantiff. But hopefully the written motion he promised to file on the matter is better argued.
 
Goddamn, Greer rolled over surprisingly easy about the IFP filing thing.
paraphrasing

He wasn't ready for the question. He was very defensive about the first question "can you not pay the 400 dollars?" Lolcows are nothing if not prideful. Of course Greer had 400 dollars! What, are you trying to say I'm a broke ass genetic reject your honor?!

You could hear the wheels turning in his head after the fact though, because he started to interject and get clarification. The Judge again asked "Well, Mister Greer, if you were to pay the 400 dollars would be unable to pay your rent and food and other things you need?" And AGAIN Greer say's "No, of course I can pay for myself! I'm not a broke ass genetic reject your honor!"

Judge very quickly said "Great! I am ordering you to start paying fees!". The Judge also sounded incredibly happy as he said it. He didn't even wait a millisecond after Greer's answer.

Kino.
 
The both the judge and Hardin agreed that the magistrate can't challenge the district judge's order to reduce the sanctions to $1000. Why did the judge put discussing if that reduction was appropriate on the schedule if he already knows he can't do anything?
Because it was fully briefed and timely to rule on. This hearing took care of all the pending motions, either disposing of them or completing the process before decision on them. The reason the motion to dismiss wasn't heard was it isn't fully briefed (the deadline for Russ filing an opposition has not passed).
 
The judge scheduled that for 1:00 PM, with nothing after, and it's over in an hour?

So he gets the rest of the afternoon off?

I picked the wrong job.
Yeah, but consider this: Russ is not the most retarded plaintiff this judge has ever seen and this case is definitely not the most retarded case he's dealt with. Not only that, but this case is at least interesting/funny, with fairly short documents. Lots of cases are as dull as dish water with hundreds to thousands of pages of documents to go through and analyze.

Still want his job?
 
So the gist of it is Tardface has 30 days to scrounge together 400 bucks or the case gets thrown out? That means starting today, If Shitlips earns $13, he'll have enough cash for the IFP.

Screenshot 2025-05-06 150757.webp
Happy job hunting, fuckface! :)

Or more than likely he'll just sit on his ass and sulk, and hope that the judge feels pity on him. (Sounds not so likely at this point)
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole