💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[Soapmore]

Love how Nick talks shit about the legal analysis of the guy who was right about just about everything.

He just did this one and i watched his viewer count drop by 30.

 

[Fapcop]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=9cbAMBHEcIwNick is implying that people being upset he accused meme copium of pedophilia can't take a joke.

If that's true then got a joke for Nick:

What's the one substance more prevalent in Nick's daughter than cocaine?

Nick's semen

Watching Nick repeat the classic tranny sound bites like: “You can just free speech somewhere else, just not on MAH platform!” is something else indeed.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

He just did this one and i watched his viewer count drop by 30.
Wyświetl załącznik 7294878

They are just asking for the lawyers to band together and sue the shit out of them.

 

[Vibralldo]

Watching Nick repeat the classic tranny sound bites like: “You can just free speech somewhere else, just not on MAH platform!” is something else indeed.

Nick really has no morals or ethics aside from "i want to feel good all the time without consequences"

 

[Vibralldo]

So far as I know, SEEEEEEEAN SEEEEEEEEAN has not made any claims of copyright. He has talked about right of publicity, an entirely different right. I suppose we can't expect anything like legal acumen from this wetbrained crackhead cocksucker.

Nick himself has stated how Sean and Kurt are nobodies. Therefore, by Nick's definition, they aren't public figures.

 

[Gator_Aids]

Not Kayla, noticeable absence of shitty tattoos and plastic surgery scars.

That was my original thought as well. My only hesitation was thinking that perhaps they modified the image in order stay on the right side of the “not revenge porn” line.

 

[Strix454]

2.1k watching Nick today down from the 16k number yesterday.

 

[Sneed Force One]

2.1k watching Nick today down from the 16k number yesterday.

From a rudimentary daily check. He's appears to be losing about 100 live viewers a day at peak.

 

[AnOminous]

Any legalkiwis got a take on this? I'd love to see Pedotips get dismantled.

"It's not Sean's voice, it's merely a voice AI creating an approximation of someone who sounds like him, using his image and name is just coincidence, fat stalker child"

I'd say if you just used a likeness with a clear indication that it was parody, with no commercial intent, it would almost certainly be protected.

However, there is no such clear indication of parody, and how can Pedotips claim parody when they're not even the authors of what is said with the AI voices? What MAPton is doing is directly selling access to the likenesses of other people who did not consent to it. The only purpose of it is commercial.

Copyright does not directly protect such a thing, but right of publicity (a different right based on dignitary and privacy interests as well as economic) exists to protect people's use of their public image, likeness, or other identifying feature (such as their voice), whether for falsely portraying them as endorsing something or otherwise.

The penalties are generally being forced to disgorge the illicit profits, attorney's fees, and any other appropriate damages, including punitive damages, as well as an injunction against further tortious misuse.

I won't get into defamation or copyright. I think they're both weak, but there's probably enough of a copyright argument there that a DMCA wouldn't be frivolous, and while DMCA is gay, what's good for the duck is good for the cuck, and Nick's gone down that road so has no room to complain (but he would).

Then there's the additional issue of what YouTube would think if some pedo is running a platform specifically to divert income from YouTube to himself, and on top of that, the platform is fueled by harassing other YouTubers.

 

[woodedbag]

what would you even be able to sue melton for? he is dying of a flesh eating disease i havent seen since cabin fever and he maybe clears 100 dollars a day on a good day.

 

[Oxyjen]

what would you even be able to sue melton for?

A third-hand Tesla. And the rights to the wildly successful Supertips empire.

 

[Maude Snew]

When will you kill yourself?

He's working on it, just taking the scenic route, which I'm fine with, it's more content for us and more suffering for him, so win/win really.

 

[AnOminous]

what would you even be able to sue melton for? he is dying of a flesh eating disease i havent seen since cabin fever and he maybe clears 100 dollars a day on a good day.

Probably not much. But you could get an injunction forcing him to knock it off.

 

[Philly Phunk Machine]

Nick is using his PedoTip system to talk crap about @PotentiallyCriminal.
Wyświetl załącznik 7294660
[EDIT to add Nick winning the winemoms over with his edgy humor]
Wyświetl załącznik 7294672

Sean, I suggest you wait until after he loses the Monty lawsuit and then publicly declare that you're suing him for copyright infringement. You don't even have to commit to the legal action; just wait until he's in another financial hole and then scare him with another potential money drain.

 

[Captain Manning]

Nick himself has stated how Sean and Kurt are nobodies. Therefore, by Nick's definition, they aren't public figures.

Given he reads this thread, he's probably gonna go with that now if either one of them sues him or Melton.

You should bill him for the legal advice.

 

[Potentially Criminal]

So far as I know, SEEEEEEEAN SEEEEEEEEAN has not made any claims of copyright. He has talked about right of publicity, an entirely different right. I suppose we can't expect anything like legal acumen from this wetbrained crackhead cocksucker.

There's also the ToS for supertips....but what do I know. I do shoddy analysis......

 

[A Very Big Fish]

There's also the ToS for supertips....but what do I know. I do shoddy analysis......

Wyświetl załącznik 7295029

Good thing there are no (former) lawyers abusing the ToS.

That would be embarrassing.

 

[Not Even Twice]

The dress is old; however, the photo is new. You can tell because Kayla is noticeably fatter and has at least two new tattoos: some awful musical notes that look like they were drawn on with magic marker by one of her children, and some mysterious piss-colored splotch on her left shoulder. (Also, someone please give this woman a fucking hairbrush.)

Wyświetl załącznik 7294640

I can't get over how much she changed up her face. She legit looks like a different person. Whether going from Gollum to Madonna-in-the-making is an upgrade I'll leave to the likes of Fapcop. She looks uncanny as hell to me, before and after the nip and tuck.

 

[Sneed Force One]

I'm not sure on the copyright infringement, its a weak case by all accounts.
Nick smuckles away, thinking he can have his collection of AI LawTubers sat in a creepy little circle.
However! Its pretty blatant violation of YouTube privacy guidelines.

 

[Vibralldo]

Given he reads this thread, he's probably gonna go with that now if either one of them sues him or Melton.

You should bill him for the legal advice.

Wouldn't that make it worse?
I'm saying that Nick thinks that Kurt and Sean aren't public figures, so that opens Nick up to more liability if sued because he's fucking with random civilians, right?