💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[Lian Xing]

I do not understand how a prosecutor thought "let's run with this!"

The prosecutor takes it as a point of emphasis, and the Toe has a record.

 

[AltisticRight]

For the love of god, somebody please KICK HIS ASS
Wyświetl załącznik 7197889

Skelly you didn't know how your daughter got into cocaine and you didn't even know how much coke you had lying around.
Shut the fuck up about modern Internet bullshit that people forget they signed up to.

 

[Vibralldo]

Nick has a legitimate claim to be a woman born in a man's body.
Tomgirl saga when? C'mon Nick, you know they're immune to consequences!

Just because he acts and weighs the same as a 16 year old girl doesn't mean he is one

 

[demicolon]

Just because he acts and weighs the same as a 16 year old girl doesn't mean he is one

If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck, it is a duck.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck, it is a duck.

He surely quacks like a teenage girl who was just dumped by her forever love.

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck, it is a duck.

But he looks like a faggot, walks like a faggot, talks like a faggot...

 

[August Levasseur]

And if the court tries to shrug this off? A jury won't.
Is a jury really going to pretend that a titty pic between friends justifies piercing attorney-client privilege? It only takes a few sympathetic jurors to return a hung jury.
There is a very real chance Aaron can get off scot-free while Nick gets new felony charges. Holiest Toe W - Total Balldo Death

None of this will effect Aaron's case in any way, even if it theoretically could. He's already agreed to plea out and will probably just stick to that because it's the sensible option when faced with felony charges related to things that he 100% did. Just taking the damn misdemeanor is a better choice than a hail Mary shot based on allegations of cyber crimes that even if true may not have any relevance to the issues at hand.

 

[Vibralldo]

But he looks like a faggot, walks like a faggot, talks like a faggot...

And sucks dick like a faggot...

 

[Sneed Force One]

None of this will effect Aaron's case in any way, even if it theoretically could. He's already agreed to plea out and will probably just stick to that because it's the sensible option when faced with felony charges related to things that he 100% did. Just taking the damn misdemeanor is a better choice than a hail Mary shot based on allegations of cyber crimes that even if true may not have any relevance to the issues at hand.

The idea that a breach of attorney-client privilege—arguably one of the most protected rights in the justice system—would have no effect is ridiculous. Courts have overturned convictions and dismissed cases over far less. Even if a plea deal was discussed or tentatively agreed to, it's not binding until accepted by the court. And if Aaron’s attorney learned that the prosecution's case may be tainted by illicit access to privileged communications, no ethical attorney would advise a client to plead guilty under those circumstances without first pursuing a full investigation.

Aaron has been offered a plea deal of a slap on the wrist and a fine of 1.00 KNUs (Kayla Nude Units), but why should he even accept that when the complainant and her husband has demonstrated the willingness to break federal law and his right to confidentiality with his legal representation—to bust him on a fucking titty pic?

It's not a "hail Mary" when constitutional rights have been severely violated. If attorney-client privilege was breached and potentially exploited by the state prosecutors, the complainant or their affiliates, that's not a technicality—it’s a Sixth Amendment violation. The court may be compelled to act not just for Aaron’s sake, but to preserve the integrity of the judicial process itself. Nick's CFAA violations involved accessing Aaron’s defense legal strategy, the relevance is direct and serious. It affects everything from the fairness of prosecution to the ability of the defence to do its job. If the other side had a window into his legal arguments, witnesses, or confidential communications, how on earth is that irrelevant?

It’s not a shot in the dark, Aaron has third-party corroboration, and by his own account, the Minnesota FBI office has already completed part of their investigation. Subpoenas have likely been already issued, and data has reportedly been returned to law enforcement.
By his own words, investigators have asked Aaron to identify relevant witnesses, which strongly suggests they’ve already reviewed concrete evidence of the distribution of confidential information. Based on that, we can assume investigators are now moving toward pre-charge investigation witness summons. Federal investigators could also be moving towards a multiple subpoenas for a grand jury before arresting Nick (if the grand jury finds cause to proceed).

Here's a quick and easy tell, Nick is always eager to run his faggot mouth about how Aaron is wrong and stupid.
Ever since Elissa Clips dropped her evidence, not a single comment. He always shuts like a clam when there's actual legal considerations.
It appears Nick is taking it seriously, why aren't you?

 

[Boingboingboingboi]

None of this will effect Aaron's case in any way, even if it theoretically could. He's already agreed to plea out and will probably just stick to that because it's the sensible option when faced with felony charges related to things that he 100% did. Just taking the damn misdemeanor is a better choice than a hail Mary shot based on allegations of cyber crimes that even if true may not have any relevance to the issues at hand.

i appreciate the realism, but aaron has repeatedly mentioned the temptation to show the court what they found so if they go that route, i don't think it's fair to call it a hail mary. if nick really did what the publicly available evidence suggests, it certainly would have a material impact on the case that could generate a more just outcome instead of pleading out given that arguably nick's criminal offense is worse than what aaron (allegedly) did.

 

[Red Frida]

For the love of god, somebody please KICK HIS ASS
Wyświetl załącznik 7197889

That window of opportunity passed I don't think it'd do any good. A good ass kicking in highschool or college might've set him straight thereafter but Nick's permanently retarded at this point.
To be honest it is a good thing he's retarded too. If he just went offline 15 months ago who knows how much cocaine he'd be exposing quietly his kids to. At least he has a slap on the wrist on his record so the next time he fucks up he'll get more punishment.

 

[Strix454]

None of this will effect Aaron's case in any way, even if it theoretically could. He's already agreed to plea out and will probably just stick to that because it's the sensible option when faced with felony charges related to things that he 100% did. Just taking the damn misdemeanor is a better choice than a hail Mary shot based on allegations of cyber crimes that even if true may not have any relevance to the issues at hand.

He has been offered a deal because they understand now that they have no chance on a felony charge. To prove any kind of charge will require the cooperation of two out-of-state witnesses who are unlikely to be helpful in the case. To prove a felony will require proving things about Aaron's intent that will be extremely difficult to prove. They will also have to put Nick and Kayla on the stand during the case to prove a felony. Testimony by either will be a total disaster. And if the Cyber Crimes issue can be brought into a trial, Nick and Kayla will potentially have to answer questions under oath about it....or take the 5th.

If Aaron has correctly described what he has been offered - a petty misdemeanor & $50 - he should take it because its so trivial and going to trial will be costly.

The charge in this case from the start pushed the limits of the revenge porn law in that those laws were designed to deal with uncontrolled distribution on the internet. That is not this case.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

He has been offered a deal because they understand now that they have no chance on a felony charge. To prove any kind of charge will require the cooperation of two out-of-state witnesses who are unlikely to be helpful in the case. To prove a felony will require proving things about Aaron's intent that will be extremely difficult to prove. They will also have to put Nick and Kayla on the stand during the case to prove a felony. Testimony by either will be a total disaster. And if the Cyber Crimes issue can be brought into a trial, Nick and Kayla will potentially have to answer questions under oath about it....or take the 5th.

If Aaron has correctly described what he has been offered - a petty misdemeanor & $50 - he should take it because its so trivial and going to trial will be costly.

The charge in this case from the start pushed the limits of the revenge porn law in that those laws were designed to deal with uncontrolled distribution on the internet. That is not this case.

It's not a bad deal, but considering Keanu and Geno didn't get served yet, it would be tempting to see it through.

Aaron taking the path of least resistance has caused him problems with the law. He should have challenged that restraining order from the ex, he should never have plead guilty to the violation, as it cost him his boxing license and even if this is a petty misdemeanour, it could still cause him problems getting a job.

Of course, he obviously did it, so there is that to factor in...

 

[AnOminous]

Nick played his usual word-games and re-defined "Cuckold" to mean something other than what it means. Another man doing your wife with your knowledge doesn't make a you a cuck according to Nick. It takes more.

If you have a dude ploughing your wife with your enthusiastic consent, you're 100 million times more pathetic a cuck than someone whose woman cheated on him.

The first is a depraved, subhuman vermin and less than a man, the second is a man who was wronged.

 

[Fletch_still_lives]

Nick in the chat of Pretty Antisocial they have Girl Friday on, an a-log who posts on the STBS sub

 

[daffodils]

Nick claims that Aaron's deal includes a pre-sentencing investigation.

Still teasing April's "assault"

Not worried

 

[AnOminous]

What I love about Rekieta watching is he's so transparently obvious. He wakes up in the morning, still seething (and drunk) about what he was mad about when he fell asleep mad (and drunk), then immediately goes to find more things to seethe about, only to go to bed seething (and drunk) about a whole new collection of things that night.

 

[mindlessobserver]

He spends more hours a day Drunk then he does Sober. Including the hours he is asleep (passed out). He's more liquor then man now. Pickled and Malding.

 

[Sneed Force One]

“It’s not my story to tell, but I’ll dance around the details without fully addressing it.”

Aaron isn’t allowed to discuss Nick, Kayla, or April because, as he says, “it’s not his story.” Kiwifarmers and others supposedly aren’t allowed to comment either, because it’s “none of their business.” But Nick can speak evasively about April’s personal experiences, including something as serious as sexual assault, despite not having her consent to do so and not being in contact with her.
Seems like Nick didn’t bother to get a mutual NDA when April distanced herself from the Balldo circle. She’s chosen to stay silent, so why doesn’t he? Why does he feel the need to defend thy lady's honor when they aren't even dating anymore? Something tells me April's eviction from the Balldo Bunker wasn't his choice. Either April ran away from him or Kayla forced her out.

Nick is coping hard here lmao

Aaron has already stated that investigators provided him with a list of witnesses they wanted him to identify, which suggests a pre-existing, active investigation. It’s highly likely that subpoenas have been issued for digital evidence, with relevant data already returned to investigators. Investigators typically seek to identify witnesses once they have already collected enough evidence to support their inquiry. They wouldn’t ask Aaron to identify witnesses unless they already had a solid base.

Nick is either misinterpreting Aaron's statements or intentionally downplaying them to minimize the situation. Either way, the situation looks more serious than he’s acknowledging. Total Balldo Death is coming, I can smell it in the air.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Still teasing April's "assault"

"Not my story to tell"

Then why the fuck are you telling it you disingenuous piece of shit?
Just kys already.