Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) 1 2 3
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
"This is the only copyright case plaintiff has ever filed"

Why should I believe that when I don't even have a list of cases you've been involved in? For all I know you have 100 more copyright cases.
 
There's a simple fucking thing Greer could do, that is painfully obvious, because anyone who has ever even seen part of a courthouse knows it, and yet he categorically refuses to do it.

It's hilarious. I'm not going to mention it because he's probably stupid enough to not realize it, as opposed to actively choosing not to do it.
There's a lot of people who have actually never really been to their local court house and wouldnt know...and most who have just go straight to wherever you get whatever permit/pay traffic ticket and leave, so I'm not surprised if even people following this thread dont know what you're talking about because they've never observed a live trial or walked around outside their courthouse to see it.

1740066495422.png
You have to go to the court yard to find it typically.
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
Mr Greer said he would still make the call, but wanted to know if Mr Moon was privately recording the conversations and posting them onto his website.
Something you can easily verify yourself and not a valid justification for refusing to progress your own case.

Greer does not appreciate the conversations between Hardin and Greer being posted onto Kiwi Farms
The conversations are accessible regardless of whether they're on the Farms or not. Precisely how much did you learn in Paralegal school?

Mr Hardin has threatened to file sanctions against Greer for simply wanting their conversations to remain private.
No, he threatened sanctions for you continuing to misappropriate the SPO. In the interests of justice, court filings should be as accessible as reasonably possible. You wouldn't want people assuming that Ariana Grande wasn't a big fat meanie based on court records they can't see, right?

Hardin said he would withdraw his motion, depending on how he likes Greer's response.
Correct. Promising to provide relevant material and then not doing that sounds sanctionable to me.

defendant's want information regarding cases filed that have nothing to do with copyrights or intellectual property.
It's absolutely relevant. You just don't understand how.

This Court has already dismissed non-copyright claims, so it's unfair for plaintiff to have to provide irrelevant information
Your non-existent restraining order against Jersh is relevant, according to you.

DEFENDANTS HAVE BEEN THE ONLY WEBSITE TO NOT COMPLY WITH A DMCA TAKEDOWN REQUEST
Demonstrably false.

This case would have never been filed had Moon simply just removed Plaintiff's copyrights and just simply removed Greer from the kiwi farms website
The Farms isn't hosting infringing material. The mocking will continue until the clownery ceases.

Plaintiff did kindly go out of his way and did provide a "litigation history" document
Incomplete and did not contain relevant documents. You are in the unique position of knowing precisely how many frivolous lawsuits you've brought. It's also as "burdensome" for you to access PACER as it is for anyone else.

Granting the 10th Circuit precedent, which has a strong history of being against fishing expeditions
Threatening to tattle to the 10th about your gross misunderstanding of the law again.

The judge is sure to be receptive to this knee jerk horse shit, Russ. Keep going! :story:
 

Załączniki

Ostatnio edytowane:
Surely if Messrs. Hardin or Moon were to be posting non-public stuff about the case to the Internet then Greer could provide examples of it and attach it to his filings, right? Right?
 
1740068474158.png

🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈
I don't suppose Hardin could bring this up, along with quotes from Russ himself saying that he doesn't check his e-mail because of how busy he is? Would the judge even give a shit?
 
Defendant's REPEATED requests for documentation regarding Plaintiff's history of vexatious litigation is an abuse of the court's time and resources and is frankly irrelevant to Plaintiff's current undertaking of vexatious litigation, as stated in case Just believe me Vs Clearly defined Rules & Regulations. Defendant's pet attack dog continually harasses Plaintiff for documents and responses without realizing that Plaintiff IS TOO BUSY TO DEAL WITH THIS. Plaintiff simply cannot sit down for a set amount of time, do research regarding relevant case law, construct a reasonable argument with that knowledge and then file it prior to a deadline. Defendant has no idea how many models there are on Instagram and LinkedIn, and Plaintiff has a duty to contact every one of them multiple times. Defendant's incessant filings regarding this case is interfering with Plaintiff's ability to live a meaningful life by forcing him to acknowledge and submit these knee-jerk reaction filings explaining why he is not participating in his litigation in a meaningful or productive way, Defendant is forcing the Plaintiff to break the rules by telling him to obey them.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole