Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
I am actually curious. How many times could Russ in theory keep appealing until he is forced to pay by the court? Could we have this case go on another 4-5 years? Also, are there any mechanisms to make him pay? It seems that he is a broke, gimpy-faced retard to I’m not sure how much he can actually pay. Would he face jail for refusing?

I guess what I’m getting at here is if I ever found myself staring down a court judgement could I just sperg about my plights for years and years?

I don't know, but I would actually kind of love it if we ever get to the day where Greer gets this hilarious kind of smackdown that we occasionally see from SCOTUS:
1739307063312.png
 
He has the right to appeal, including review by the district judge or even 10th circuit and a written explanation from the judge(s) reviewing his filing of why his appeal has/lacks merit.
Not necessarily. In Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Assoc, 134 F.3d 1438 (10th Cir. 1998), the 10th Circuit held that "Sanctions [...] generally are not deemed final appealable orders under 28 U.S.C. § 1291." as long as that sanction is civil in nature. Particularly, where the Judge orders merely to make the victims whole, as here, the sanction is civil, and not immediately appealable as per National Collegiate Athletic Assoc. See also Valentine v. James River Ins. Co., No. 22-1175 (10th Cir. Jul. 13, 2022) ("First, we conclude that Ms. Valentine may not immediately appeal the district order that related to discovery and to the conduct or progress of litigation. Second, we note that the district court has not imposed any sanctions on Ms. Valentine, but that an interlocutory sanctions order otherwise would not be immediately appealable.")
 
I am actually curious. How many times could Russ in theory keep appealing until he is forced to pay by the court? Could we have this case go on another 4-5 years? Also, are there any mechanisms to make him pay? It seems that he is a broke, gimpy-faced retard to I’m not sure how much he can actually pay. Would he face jail for refusing?
The courts may be slow, but they’re not completely broken. Once you’re in appeals against actions of the court there is a very defined process, that quickly ends with “appeal to the supremes” and if you fail, the big dick of the law appears.

Abuse of appeals takes you from fighting your opponent to fighting the court itself. Russ is near here.
 
He does have a car though that can be repo'd
But it's a weekly rental through Uber or Lyft or one of the other similar services - legally he does not own the title or even any equity in the thing.

Given that it is a vehicle he uses to make a living that would be a strong defense against repossession even if he did own it outright.

ETA: Ninja'd
 
It sounds like we don't fully know and the court should definitely find that out. In any case he's defying the order, memes are ahead
Once the judgement is approved Hardin can likely file for a debtors exam to find this stuff out if Greer fails to pay or agree to a payment plan before any deadline the court gives.
 
Hardin withdrew that. The sanctions for that were based on Russ deliberately trying to tamper with Taylor. Taylor was dead at the time, so even if that was Russ's intention, he couldn't have actually done it. He's reserved the right to file for sanctions on some other theory, though, for Russ lying to the court about a man three months dead being "eager" to testify.
Yep the Steve thing is withdrawn because the poor guy is dead, there is tho a 24th deadline for the 'motion to compel show cause' about the totally real restraining order.
 
Seems nice of Hardin to only list the fees that Null actually paid instead of his Fitzpatrick rate of $669. Any idea why he wouldn't have invoiced Russ for the full value of his time?
Hardin is a FOIA specialist. I bet he is ideologically aligned with Null on the issue of Internet freedom. He is listed as a founding member of Null's charity, the US Internet preservation society. All signs point to him being a legitimate fighter.
 
Not necessarily. In Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Assoc, 134 F.3d 1438 (10th Cir. 1998), the 10th Circuit held that "Sanctions [...] generally are not deemed final appealable orders under 28 U.S.C. § 1291." as long as that sanction is civil in nature.
It depends on the nature of the sanction. Sanctions pursuant to a claim of privilege often are appealable, because it would be pointless to appeal them after the privilege had already been breached. This is even though the underlying order might not itself be appealable, subsequent to Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100 (2009) (resolving a circuit split on the issue).
In any case he's defying the order, memes are ahead
There isn't an order yet.
 
I was hit by a car yesterday (No joke!)
and reading the phrase "The total amount reflected as being due as of this moment is $5,559.76" warmed my heart and made me feel better.

You fight it, Greer! NEVER GIVE UP! That judge only ruled against you because he's a mean bad man who hates the disabled! You don't have to pay that money if you don't want to!
 
No puzzle - he didn't do the thing the money was for, so he didn't take the money. It's just honest, most people would do the same. Makes me think Russell's lying deviance is more nature than nurture.
Oh, I remember now. Russhole told his Dad not to talk to the "crazy man", hence it wouldn't be right to take payment for services not rendered.
 
That's also increadibly merciful. Hardin could have asked for three times that and probably gotten it. All moot anyway since Greer probably doesn't have 50 dollars, let alone 5000
The restraint was an elegant touch, with no downside.

This goes back to Greer's original complaint in which he himself admits:
His use of "the girl" makes my skin crawl. Pretty sure she wasn't a child, Russell. Also pretty sure this was a legal pleading, where one must at least pretend to respect other human beings.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole