ye's Official KF Burner
working on an album called "kiwifarms was right"
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 8 Mar 2023
His devices should be searched. Just saying.
Skibidi Farms / NoLimitsPedia / Gnarpedia / Totencord / Hutucord / Spawnism / Goyswats / Kastle / UCS / Kiliverse / Dwinny / Thugchan / Zukencord - you will NEVER GUESS what the "IRONIC" PEDOPHILE RING openly admitted to distributing!!!!! 😱😱😱
- Twórca wątku Sprate Header
- Data rozpoczęcia
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
smelly dumb journo scum
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 11 Sty 2025
I haven't listened to the whole interview since it's about 2 hours long, but I thought the interview was done on twitter spaces not discord.
At what point can you consider someone a journalist? Anyways, if someone tips off the police after an interview, why would they publicly admit to it? That seems counterproductive to me.
- Dołączono
- 17 Sty 2023
A journalist must have a Press pass, and an established Press firm that they work with, and have it on their resume as a form of employment to meet the basic qualifications of a Journalist.
A podcaster is not automatically a journalist, it is someone with a microphone. Would you call Andrew Tate a journalist? Would you consider Hawk Tuah a journalist? If you want to get into the old yellow arguement spheres, "would you consider Geraldo and other sensationalists a journalist?"
You don't get to claim to be a journalist or have journalist's integrity if you are not one, and you do not really get to claim the latter, especially if you're a sensationalist or gonzo one. The Gonzo journalist has no integrity outside of viewership or numbers, and utilizing the "Can't sell a source" is more so of a personal take of "Fuck you pig" rather than having integrity, because most gonzo journalists just happen to be of that particular niche of society of "Overly loud annoying anti authority types who would rather 1 billion children get shot in the head than to ever actually help the authorities in the slightest."
>Why would they publicly admit it?
It's a PR thing, to at least say "Hey, I am not affiliated with this group, nor do I share in their beliefs, nor do I condone their actions." I am not seeing any of that whatsoever even implied, even a basic statement of "Hey, this groups beliefs are their own, I don't personally agree with them" would imply some sort of "Yeah, it's going to the proper people." Clearly, no one is going to say "So I just infiltrated a cult, talked to its leader, and forwarded all information to the authorities." however, if they are claiming to be a journalist, or an interviewer, without making a PR statement of distance or unaffiliation, it assumes "I'm an attention whore" or worse "I'm running public PR for the group."
- Dołączono
- 7 Lip 2022
I would consider a pig with a gopro a journalist, because that's how little respect I have for them.
ye's Official KF Burner
working on an album called "kiwifarms was right"
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 8 Mar 2023
I have more respect for GoPros mounted on animals because it's actually interesting to watch.
- Dołączono
- 6 Lut 2021
Bx has put out a post about Brian, to which he's responded:
(https://archive.ph/GQcl6)
(https://archive.ph/3lxJn)
ye's Official KF Burner
working on an album called "kiwifarms was right"
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 8 Mar 2023
She doesn't miss
smelly dumb journo scum
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 11 Sty 2025
In the USA, I think those people are protected by the same laws as legitimate journalists. As far as I am aware, a press pass is not a legal requirement to be considered a journalist in the USA.
What are your thoughts on independent journalism?
I'm sure there are people who lack integrity but also have a Press pass, and an established Press firm that they work with, and have it on their resume as a form of employment. In every profession, you can find individuals who lack integrity.
I think it's pretty obvious he doesn't condone them, given what he said about the Liber interview:
ye's Official KF Burner
working on an album called "kiwifarms was right"
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 8 Mar 2023
That's nice but he literally called people who don't like csam "moralfags" and he implies that young victims deserve it. So just because he might not condone some parts doesn't excuse the fact that he incriminated himself.
why are you gunt guarding so hard for him?
Edit: Your post history is very suspect, 2025 account.
- Dołączono
- 6 Lut 2021
So he's saying that people who don't like CSAM are ackshually the real pedos, out of, what? Love of the sport?
- Dołączono
- 1 Lut 2025
smelly dumb journo scum
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 11 Sty 2025
In the short clip that Sprate Header posted, I thought he was talking about pedophile hunters who turn out to be sex offenders.
When did he imply the victims deserve what happened to them? I haven't finished the entire interview yet, so could you point to a timestamp?
- Dołączono
- 1 Lut 2025
brian nuckols reminds me of angeleno
- Dołączono
- 6 Lut 2021
You are fucking stupid.
"If CP is getting a huge rise out of you... sometimes it means the person... has a thing for kids, I'm just gonna say it. And I think that's why people get pissed at y'all a lot."
ye's Official KF Burner
working on an album called "kiwifarms was right"
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 8 Mar 2023
Is anyone else feeling a little weird about that account? Or is it just me?
Maybe I'm too cautious. I need to go touch grass or something.
Maybe I'm too cautious. I need to go touch grass or something.
- Dołączono
- 6 Lut 2021
- Dołączono
- 17 Sty 2023
@smelly dumb journo scum
In the USA, I think those people are protected by the same laws as legitimate journalists. As far as I am aware, a press pass is not a legal requirement to be considered a journalist in the USA.
A press pass allows for legitimacy of your intention and rights to be a documenting reporter, the ability to easily get one gives credence to the possibility that you are one, and that I have to think very carefully before punching you in the mouth.
What are your thoughts on independent journalism?
My personal ones? I think we are very lucky to live in a country where we are able to express freedom of expression and observation. That being said, there are less protections in place for you to not be punched in the mouth for your expressions if they are particularly offensive or piss me off. If you have a press pass, I can just shoot you a look of disgust and say "I have no interest in talking with you." Without that press pass, I can flat out backhand you and ask "What the actual fuck is wrong with you?"
I'm sure there are people who lack integrity but also have a Press pass, and an established Press firm that they work with, and have it on their resume as a form of employment. In every profession, you can find individuals who lack integrity.
Very true, which is why it is recommended to limit contact with them and consider their sources of information to be biased or sensationalist. There's a reason you don't see people going to the National Inquirer or Cracked.com about Domestic Terrorist Events. A podcaster without a Press, or a defenses of the Press via a Press Pass or ability to gain one, doesn't even equate the lowest levels of tabloidesque journalism.
You could argue "Well, he's a founding member of Death Drive Press" which, if you'll look into is a radical leftist press publication that specifically peddles in alt left dissemination and publishing. Which does invalidate the whole "Well, he IS a journalist because look, he's part of a firm." which if so, congratulations, that argument is indeed one. He's on the same level of journalism as Neo Nazis, White Supremacists, and Cult PR persons who utilize similar schemes to legitimize their Press and PR.
I think it's pretty obvious he doesn't condone them, given what he said about the Liber interview
"This is the paradox of the edgesphere. They claim nothing is serious, nothing matters. But the FBI still raids their houses. Their memes still shape school shooters manifestos. Their communities still crack and harden into real-world violence."
Where in that statement is the direct "I don't condone this?" To me, the regular ol Joe Schmoe on the streets it sounds like "They (the group being interviewed) are influencing school shooters, and are making real world violence, but they claim nothing is serious."
Where is the "And they are bad people?" "And this is why I don't agree with them?" It sounds to me, the psychotherapy part of empathizing with your patient and the journalist part of "Report the facts neutrally to your audience" got mixed up.
I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on this one, because this is someone who genuinely seems to be trying to do something empathetic and good, despite our differing views on life. He's trying to empathize with monsters, trying to figure them out; however, he is going about it the very wrong way, and has inadvertingly played a card that states "I support these people"
That's very bad, and if not addressed, will be capitalized by people already working on these cases, and by the people who he has interviewed. He has absolutely no idea what he doing, and what he just got involved in.
Do you remember that scene from "The Dark Knight Returns" with Frank Miller where Joker's Therapist is like "Oh, yeah, he's all better now? Let's go on late night television with him to both Humanize and show off his progress?" It's play by play that exact scene.
You absolute naive fool, your heart may have been in the right place, but you genuinely have no idea how much more difficult you have made your own life in this.
And this is me giving you the benefit of the doubt. Fix your PR issue NOW.
In the USA, I think those people are protected by the same laws as legitimate journalists. As far as I am aware, a press pass is not a legal requirement to be considered a journalist in the USA.
A press pass allows for legitimacy of your intention and rights to be a documenting reporter, the ability to easily get one gives credence to the possibility that you are one, and that I have to think very carefully before punching you in the mouth.
What are your thoughts on independent journalism?
My personal ones? I think we are very lucky to live in a country where we are able to express freedom of expression and observation. That being said, there are less protections in place for you to not be punched in the mouth for your expressions if they are particularly offensive or piss me off. If you have a press pass, I can just shoot you a look of disgust and say "I have no interest in talking with you." Without that press pass, I can flat out backhand you and ask "What the actual fuck is wrong with you?"
I'm sure there are people who lack integrity but also have a Press pass, and an established Press firm that they work with, and have it on their resume as a form of employment. In every profession, you can find individuals who lack integrity.
Very true, which is why it is recommended to limit contact with them and consider their sources of information to be biased or sensationalist. There's a reason you don't see people going to the National Inquirer or Cracked.com about Domestic Terrorist Events. A podcaster without a Press, or a defenses of the Press via a Press Pass or ability to gain one, doesn't even equate the lowest levels of tabloidesque journalism.
You could argue "Well, he's a founding member of Death Drive Press" which, if you'll look into is a radical leftist press publication that specifically peddles in alt left dissemination and publishing. Which does invalidate the whole "Well, he IS a journalist because look, he's part of a firm." which if so, congratulations, that argument is indeed one. He's on the same level of journalism as Neo Nazis, White Supremacists, and Cult PR persons who utilize similar schemes to legitimize their Press and PR.
I think it's pretty obvious he doesn't condone them, given what he said about the Liber interview
"This is the paradox of the edgesphere. They claim nothing is serious, nothing matters. But the FBI still raids their houses. Their memes still shape school shooters manifestos. Their communities still crack and harden into real-world violence."
Where in that statement is the direct "I don't condone this?" To me, the regular ol Joe Schmoe on the streets it sounds like "They (the group being interviewed) are influencing school shooters, and are making real world violence, but they claim nothing is serious."
Where is the "And they are bad people?" "And this is why I don't agree with them?" It sounds to me, the psychotherapy part of empathizing with your patient and the journalist part of "Report the facts neutrally to your audience" got mixed up.
I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on this one, because this is someone who genuinely seems to be trying to do something empathetic and good, despite our differing views on life. He's trying to empathize with monsters, trying to figure them out; however, he is going about it the very wrong way, and has inadvertingly played a card that states "I support these people"
That's very bad, and if not addressed, will be capitalized by people already working on these cases, and by the people who he has interviewed. He has absolutely no idea what he doing, and what he just got involved in.
Do you remember that scene from "The Dark Knight Returns" with Frank Miller where Joker's Therapist is like "Oh, yeah, he's all better now? Let's go on late night television with him to both Humanize and show off his progress?" It's play by play that exact scene.
You absolute naive fool, your heart may have been in the right place, but you genuinely have no idea how much more difficult you have made your own life in this.
And this is me giving you the benefit of the doubt. Fix your PR issue NOW.
smelly dumb journo scum
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 11 Sty 2025
Can anyone make out what wickerkid is saying about "legal stuff" at the end of his interview. He says that he "doesn't care what [unclear]" about 45:30. His audio quality is notably worse than Zuken.
I might be acting like an armchair expert here, but after listening through this, there's various questions that I feel Brian Nuckols should have asked. Off the top of my head, I would have asked questions like:
"Given the school shooting in antioch, are you worried about getting attention from the police?"
"What about the people like raidz who, according to you, have actual CSAM? Are you worried about being implicated?"
"Why do you still associate with raidz or allow him on your site?"
"Given that you want to avoid doing anything illegal, why did you have a guide to finding CSAM on your wiki?"
I'm sure there's better ways to phrase the questions, but these are just examples.
There's also a lot of topics that he doesn't follow up on. At about 30 minutes in, he asks wickerkid about the moderation of skibidifarms. Wickerkid claims that he doesn't allow anything illegal on Skibidifarms. Aside from CP, he gives the example that hosts don't allow phishing links or openly admitting to DDOSing. He also says that it's "not really an issue with us.", though I'm not sure if he's meant he doesn't do it, or he'd be fine with it if not for the hosts
Now, I couldn't find any instances of skibidifarm's users openly DDOSing anyone, but they have openly incited or admitted to other illegal acts (like swatting). They have a subforum specifically for raiding. I would have asked about those things.
That also ties into the topic of "moralfagging", which Nuckols also brought up around a minute later when he asked Wickerkid "what lines shouldn't be crossed?". He states something along the lines of "nothing" but that he has some stuff that he finds annoying. This is another point in the recording that I had trouble hearing.
I would have asked them more about why they (claim to) avoid breaking the law. Are they only worried about consequences? Is it still "moralfagging" if you criticize something or call it immoral, without being angry?
I might be acting like an armchair expert here, but after listening through this, there's various questions that I feel Brian Nuckols should have asked. Off the top of my head, I would have asked questions like:
"Given the school shooting in antioch, are you worried about getting attention from the police?"
"What about the people like raidz who, according to you, have actual CSAM? Are you worried about being implicated?"
"Why do you still associate with raidz or allow him on your site?"
"Given that you want to avoid doing anything illegal, why did you have a guide to finding CSAM on your wiki?"
I'm sure there's better ways to phrase the questions, but these are just examples.
There's also a lot of topics that he doesn't follow up on. At about 30 minutes in, he asks wickerkid about the moderation of skibidifarms. Wickerkid claims that he doesn't allow anything illegal on Skibidifarms. Aside from CP, he gives the example that hosts don't allow phishing links or openly admitting to DDOSing. He also says that it's "not really an issue with us.", though I'm not sure if he's meant he doesn't do it, or he'd be fine with it if not for the hosts
Now, I couldn't find any instances of skibidifarm's users openly DDOSing anyone, but they have openly incited or admitted to other illegal acts (like swatting). They have a subforum specifically for raiding. I would have asked about those things.
That also ties into the topic of "moralfagging", which Nuckols also brought up around a minute later when he asked Wickerkid "what lines shouldn't be crossed?". He states something along the lines of "nothing" but that he has some stuff that he finds annoying. This is another point in the recording that I had trouble hearing.
I would have asked them more about why they (claim to) avoid breaking the law. Are they only worried about consequences? Is it still "moralfagging" if you criticize something or call it immoral, without being angry?
- Dołączono
- 6 Lut 2021
Alex Rosen from Predator Poachers has retweeted Bx's thread about Nuckols and Skibidi Farms 
(https://archive.ph/8tz7n)
(https://archive.ph/8tz7n)
ye's Official KF Burner
working on an album called "kiwifarms was right"
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 8 Mar 2023
These are some pretty basic questions but the fact that he avoided any of this should tell you everything you need to know about that faggot.
Let's fucking go, total pedophile death.Alex Rosen from Predator Poachers has retweeted Bx's thread about Nuckols and Skibidi Farms
Wyświetl załącznik 6955527
(https://archive.ph/8tz7n)