- Dołączono
- 8 Lip 2019
I don't see why the state would negotiate or cave to Nick's bullshit. What he's professed publicly seems to confirm the "drop the child neglect" theory. But there is no way drop that if the drugs were there. (Which at a sight, will be proven true by the body cam, and then confirmed by testing.)
Despite Nick's claim that he has all this proof of evidence mishandling, he also said originally that the warrant would get thrown out. That he thinks they're really close is likely because in his twisted head, he didn't abuse the kids and the state "admitted" it. (Which was not the case at all.) So that 5% Nick claimed to Juju, is more likely 30-50% off.
He's not a good lawyer, his views on his own case are tainted (by NPD and also likely by substances), and he didn't exactly hire Johnny Cochran to represent him. If his lawyers' brief writing is that bad, why would their negotiating skills be significantly better?
If the theory is true about the neglect being the obstacle to resolution, the state won't offer to drop that (there were kids and drugs in the home, it's a lock), and we're going to trial.
Despite Nick's claim that he has all this proof of evidence mishandling, he also said originally that the warrant would get thrown out. That he thinks they're really close is likely because in his twisted head, he didn't abuse the kids and the state "admitted" it. (Which was not the case at all.) So that 5% Nick claimed to Juju, is more likely 30-50% off.
He's not a good lawyer, his views on his own case are tainted (by NPD and also likely by substances), and he didn't exactly hire Johnny Cochran to represent him. If his lawyers' brief writing is that bad, why would their negotiating skills be significantly better?
If the theory is true about the neglect being the obstacle to resolution, the state won't offer to drop that (there were kids and drugs in the home, it's a lock), and we're going to trial.
