- Dołączono
- 23 Gru 2019
Every time this bitch starts to fade into obscurity she acts out in a huge way, it's clear she's just doing this for attention
Obejrzyj poniższy film, aby zobaczyć, jak zainstalować naszą witrynę jako aplikację internetową na ekranie głównym.
Uwaga: Ta funkcja może być niedostępna w niektórych przeglądarkach.
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | 7 Lip 2026 | ||
| — | 7 Lip 2026 | ORDER granting 106 Motion for Leave to Electronically File Document under Seal. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lara K. Eshkenazi on 7/8/2026. (SW) | |
| — | 7 Lip 2026 | ||
| — | 7 Lip 2026 | ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to file a supplemental affidavit from Andrea Sun-Mee Jones by 7/24/2026, providing additional information regarding her qualifications for and experience in "data breach mitigation" and detailed descriptions of the nature of the work she performed to support the charges detailed in her invoice [100-4]. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lara K. Eshkenazi on 7/8/2026. (MED) | |
| — | 7 Lip 2026 | ORDER. Pursuant to the parties' representation in 105 status letter that the parties have agreed to transfer the case, the Court directs the parties to file a joint or consent motion to transfer on or before July 23, 2026. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 7/8/2026. (FSC) |
I imagine SOME lawyers, if you throw enough cash, will let you sue the queen of England. Filing lawsuits DOES NOT mean it will be successful though, a shocking amount of lolsuits are filed, but go absolutely fucking nowhere.I just can't square how any lawyer would sign onto that though.
Fun fact: the Second Circuit, unlike some other federal circuits, courts can apply state anti-SLAPP statutes under the Erie doctrine. Fairly recently (2020), New York replaced its previously weak and anemic anti-SLAPP statute with one more similar to the robust statutes you see in states like California and Texas.The little bitch Haywood, has an entire paragraph crying about being made fun of.
The KUSK firm is truly a stable of lolcows
Apparently he despaired of ever being considered shocking for his transgressive behavior and edgy music in current year and decided to become a lawyer and instead shock people with his herculean incompetence.Is that Marylin Manson?
He almost has to grift on it because it's going to cost 5-6 figures.SmashJT should absolutely STFU and not talk about this anymore for his own good until after it's over.
This is the female version of photoshopping pokemon into pictures of yourself. Jesus save me from the cringe.You should see her latest TikTok video mocking him.
Plaintiff is arguing purposeful availment by directing his activities to New York and sufficient contacts based on I don't know what. It might be a threshold issue to raise. It might also be better to litigate it in New York anyway because the Ninth Circuit doesn't seem to apply anti-SLAPP in federal court.IIRC, SmashJT is not in New York. There's immediately a huge jurisdiction problem for her to overcome.
In fact, Tarzia's conduct has become more and more extreme
New York and this Court should recognize a residual liability tort for stochastic terrorism where a person engaged in a targeted pattern of harassment directed at one person, with the express goal of otherwise tortiously interfering in that person's life or livelihood.
This is what is called a "novel" and "creative" argument. These asshats are literally inviting the court to make up a currently nonexistent common law tort out of thin air by pure magic.This is a tweet they define as “extreme” and “stochastic terrorism.”
He can easily afford the money himself. This is the same guy who drop 10 grand on the vaporware known as theUnfortunately for her, SmashJT is more than popular enough that if he decides to pass the hat, he'll be able to raise enough to cover expenses. I think this probably won't survive a motion to dismiss though.
Accusing a woman of being a Prostitute is akin to accusing anyone of being a Pedophile. It is per se defamation. This statement would in fact be a problem for SmashJT, with or without material damages to mercante, but for the niggling detail that she did in fact publicly claim to be a Cam Whore, which is considered by many in "The Public" to be a form of prostitution.
I assume she's angling for a settlement, because one likely outcome of this is legal precedent that yes, e-hooers are still hooers, and you can call them that. So I'm sure Alyssa's fellow-hooer-travelers will be as thrilled about her lawsuit, as deep blue states were when New York fought Bruen to the Supreme Court, and lost everyone else's gun control too.Gotta love the blatant hypocrisy of Alyssa, who 100% believes that "sex work is real work!", trying to claim that she's been defamed because somebody insinuated she was a prostitute.
Futhermore, that was just one of the three articles Nathan wrote about her. He also interviewed her on RPS and invited her to write a "How to Develop Games" article on Kotaku. It contained no useful info for aspiring game developers, it was a guide on how to google for actual guides on how to develop game enginesTo elaborate, Nathan was the author of the largest puff piece to be written about Zoe Quinn, hyping up Depression Quest and her "gamedev skills" seemingly out of nowhere when much better games are listed within the same article. It begged the question: why would he write about her at all? It later came out that he also paid her $600. It seems pretty obvious she buttered him up & slept with him to get articles written about her, he accidentally knocked her up, and paid for the abortion.
Nathan Grayson's part of Gamergate leans more heavily on the Gamejournopros mailing list side, rather than The Zoe Post™ itself.
She's in her late 30s.How old is alyssa? Why does she look 60? Who would upload this thinking it looks good and unbothered it's just goes on and on for a full minute
Wyświetl załącznik 6742654
It has at least a chance to survive a motion to dismiss on the literal prostitution claims depending on the context and whether it constituted a claim of fact, if not because of the sexual chastity part, because prostitution is illegal in New York.So since I'm no lawyer, I have to ask those more legally educated here -
Does this have a snowflake's chance in hell?