Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    15 Wrz 2020
  • Terminated
    22 Kwi 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    6 Sie 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow, LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 127)

# Date Description Filing
6 Sie 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 15 Maj 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 28 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 25 Kwi 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 25 Kwi 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    19 Mar 2024
  • Terminated
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    16 Paź 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
LOLCOW LLC, RUSSELL G GREER, KIWI FARMS, JOSHUA MOON

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 155)

# Date Description Filing
16 Paź 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 15 Paź 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) 1 2
131 10 Lip 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) 1 2
130 10 Cze 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) 1 2
129 10 Cze 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    10 Cze 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    21 Cze 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 525)

# Date Description Filing
486 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 480 Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document 1 filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (publicly-filed Tennessee in forma pauperis application), # 2 Exhibit B (publicly-filed Tennessee order denying in forma pauperis status), # 3 Exhibit C (publicly-filed Nevada in forma pauperis applications))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2 3 4
485 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 478 Defendant's MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum in Support as to both claims and counterclaims filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) PDF
484 21 Cze 2026 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re 477 Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate 449 Modification of Docket, 453 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Mr. Greer did not timely file because he "fell asleep"))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 06/22/2026) 1 2
481 18 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [477] Defendant's MOTION to Amend Judgment and Memorandum in Support (Motion to Reconsider)Defendant's MOTION to Vacate [449] Modification of Docket, [453] Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion to Dismiss, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Mo filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF
483 17 Cze 2026 RESPONSE to Motion re [480] Defendant's MOTION to Unseal Document [1] filed by Russell G. Greer and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (jrj) PDF

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    26 Paź 2021
  • Terminated
    15 Paź 2023
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    15 Cze 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
10010756599 19 Paź 2022 [10949330] Appellant's reply brief filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 10/20/2022. Manner of Service: email. Word/page count: 6487. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] [Entered: 10/21/2022 07:58 AM]
Recalcitrant is going to get shoved into Russ' lexicon now. That's not an everyday word so it looks fancy and a judge said it so it must be a legalese magic word for "bad uncooperative meanie" he can use against the next whore who doesn't like the Olive Garden dinner.
 
Whatever the judge decides, those filings are going to be fun.
I'm hoping we get one of those immediate kneejerk filings he's clearly been sitting on in case his stalling tactics don't work.

Please please please send the judge another Tumblr blog with pictures of Hitler to explain why evidence doesn't matter and the rules don't apply to you. It would be so fucking funny. :story:
 
This is an amazing ruling for Null but I will wait until the 23rd with managed expectations because the court has already issued an empty threat about dismissing the case and Greer's reposting of his retarded schedule was apparently deemed good enough.
They are required to issue threats before acting on them (depending on the severity of the sanction). The purpose is to clearly inform the threatened side that they are walking on a thin line, and to give power to the later-issued sanction. This is ordinarily required for normal litigants (see, for example, Fuentes v. Chavez, 314 F. App'x 143 (10th Cir. 2009) "Rule 41(b) specifically authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failing to comply with any aspect of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [...] Employing Rule 41(b) to dismiss a case without prejudice for failure to comply with Rule 8 of course allows the plaintiff another go at trimming the verbiage; accordingly, a district court may, without abusing its discretion, enter such an order without attention to any particular procedures. Dismissing a case with prejudice, however, is a significantly harsher remedy-the death penalty of pleading punishments-and we have held that, for a district court to exercise soundly its discretion in imposing such a result, it must first consider certain criteria. Specifically, "[t]hese criteria include '(1) the degree of actual prejudice to the defendant; (2) the amount of interference with the judicial process; (3) the culpability of the litigant; (4) whether the court warned the party in advance that dismissal of the action would be a likely sanction for noncompliance; and (5) the efficacy of lesser sanctions.'") and to a much higher degree for pro se litigants (Id. "[while talking about dismissal as a sanction] While we are more reluctant to dismiss a pro se plaintiffs complaint with prejudice, as it is more difficult to determine whether he has truly grasped how to cure the defects in his complaint, the court did not simply tell Mr. Fuentes to "comply with the pleading requirements" but told him plainly to add more facts. He did not do so, and his similarly confusing brief before this court suggests another opportunity to amend would be futile as well. There is a limit to how many bites even a pro se plaintiff can have at the apple, and it was not an abuse of discretion for the district court to find that Mr. Fuentes had met that limit.")

This is also true for sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2) which the judge cited. (see, for example Royal MFG Co. v. IXL Premium Lubricants, Case No. 1:16-cv-00050-PMW (D. Utah Apr. 20, 2018) or Prisbrey v. State Auto Ins. Cos., 4:21-cv-00124-DN-DBP (D. Utah Nov. 27, 2023))
I absolutely can’t wait to see how Russhole tries to spin this as Josh’s fault somehow
I mean, he already has, and the Judge specifically dismissed those arguments. Here's to hoping.
Screenshot 2024-12-10 155610.png
Screenshot 2024-12-10 155651.png
Screenshot 2024-12-10 155750.png
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I mean, he already has, and the Judge specifically dismissed those arguments. Here's to hoping.
Screenshot 2024-12-10 155610.png
It's ridiculous he thinks Hardin will leak confidential info to the forum. Nigga I'm no expert, but that sounds like something you could get jail time for. I'm glad the Judge is actually getting serious with rusty- feels like this was the plan all along tbh
 
This is an amazing ruling for Null but I will wait until the 23rd with managed expectations
Me too. It's like having to go to a wedding when you don't really want to and finding an unexpected free bar. Great in the moment, but guarantees nothing for future duty weddings.

Whatever the judge decides, those filings are going to be fun.
Something to look forward to. I mean, Russ is 'a good person', why can't the court see that and just launch Josh into the sun?
 
It's ridiculous he thinks Hardin will leak confidential info to the forum.
No, he thinks Mr. Hardin will tell it to Null (as he should) and then Null will leak it to the forum (and given that I am the only person posting updates of this case, and Null has specifically refused to do it on at least two occasions (as he should) then it's implied that he thinks that either I am Null's alt, or Null is leaking stuff through me (he is not)
 
No, he thinks Mr. Hardin will tell it to Null (as he should) and then Null will leak it to the forum (and given that I am the only person posting updates of this case, and Null has specifically refused to do it on at least two occasions (as he should) then it's implied that he thinks that either I am Null's alt, or Null is leaking stuff through me (he is not)
Don’t you know that Null runs Kiwifarms and PACER and CourtListener?
 
No, he thinks Mr. Hardin will tell it to Null (as he should) and then Null will leak it to the forum (and given that I am the only person posting updates of this case, and Null has specifically refused to do it on at least two occasions (as he should) then it's implied that he thinks that either I am Null's alt, or Null is leaking stuff through me (he is not)
I'm pretty sure even the court could figure out if you were a sock. The judge isn't a boomer. That and even if you WERE, that is under the expectation that Josh is retarded and wants to get turbofucked. It literally doesn't make sense no matter how you look at it
 
I am the only person posting updates of this case, and Null has specifically refused to do it on at least two occasions (as he should) then it's implied that he thinks that either I am Null's alt, or Null is leaking stuff through me (he is not)
So you're Hardin AND Null? I guess that's one way to get around the prohibition against representing an LLC pro se. Actually, isn't there a random text about Joshua Moon not being a real person?
 
No, he thinks Mr. Hardin will tell it to Null (as he should) and then Null will leak it to the forum (and given that I am the only person posting updates of this case, and Null has specifically refused to do it on at least two occasions (as he should) then it's implied that he thinks that either I am Null's alt, or Null is leaking stuff through me (he is not)
Or you are Hardin.

 
Don’t you know that Null runs Kiwifarms and PACER and CourtListener?
I thought Putin ran PACER and that's why Jackie can't find the Torswat case
Actually, isn't there a random text about Joshua Moon not being a real person?
There is. “There is no Joshua Moon. If you think very, very hard, you will actually know who this is. I know you think I'm a tosser, but trust me. You will KNOW.“
 
So you're Hardin AND Null? I guess that's one way to get around the prohibition against representing an LLC pro se. Actually, isn't there a random text about Joshua Moon not being a real person?
Null/Hardin/Useful_Mistake are three separate beings that are at the same time the same being, much in the way of Yaweh.
 
Null/Hardin/Useful_Mistake are three separate beings that are at the same time the same being, much in the way of Yaweh.
I don't know whether I should feel honored that you are comparing me to a God, or offended because you are comparing me to a Jewish War God.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole