💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[thebigdream]

What the fuck?

Is he regretting being in Aaron's chat today, and is now trying to claim Sean was impersonating him?

Then thought better of making that false claim?

Can you imagine the amount of times he punched himself in the head after deleting the tweet? This'll make the black eye look like a love tap.

 

[Thunderous Lightning]

I wasn't even there, what are you talking about. It was Sean

 

[Captain Manning]

Was he really gonna try and pass off his sperging in Aarons chat as Sean pretending to be him?

It sure as fuck looks like it.

Just FYI, his chats had the verification checkmark. So that's not gonna work. Maybe he had a "moment of clarity" and realized that.

Sean doesn't need to pull any gay ops for quick cash Nick. He has a real job you fucking mongoloid.

I wasn't kidding when I said earlier he doesn't really talk about Nick that much on his streams. He's not milking it like some others I can name.

Rekieta's not pissed at Sean because he talks about him the most. He doesn't. He's pissed at Sean because Sean has been talking the most truth. Sean is an actual practicing criminal defense attorney who knows what he's talking about. Nick has nothing legitimate to counter that.

Be careful my rotund Kiwi, there are apparently ops afoot. Ops of a homosexuality most foul.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Since I haven't seen the tweet, I can't confirm this, though.

I think the tweet was real. If I were to fake something, I'd at least make it some embarrassing thing that makes sense. That tweet sounded like some paranoid, drug-fueled line of thought that escaped, and he then deleted.

Edit: I’m phone fagging. Initially quoted the wrong thing. And I’m just going to throw this unrelated information here too:

 

[Martin Cooter King Jr]

Larry is also a recovering addict and has posted about his sobriety journey and milestones on Twitter. He probably did not want to invite that kind of addict mentality closer into this life--especially when he has a new relationship with a woman after a long search.

Imagine. Former addict, trying to do a good thing for a former associate and all you see is total denial and lies on stream. Pretty much everything that happened after showed he was right, as Balldo was obviously calling the shots re his case

Nick came to Larry's defense I believe after he was ousted by the "lawtube community." Larry I'm sure had good faith to return the favour, but after seeing not just a smoking gun, but a still loaded gun, Larry knew there was no helping/winning the case.

As @Himedall All-seeing Waifu noted, Larry seems is open about his sobriety on X, something Nick has yet to accomplish or admit to in real life. Lying would definitely be a trigger for a former "user" of any kind.

So, criminally, there was only one real victim in Nick's crimes. A little girl. (The hunger, etc is a CPS issue.)

One victim, only on paper. Not on paper? Possibly an entire Minnesota county.

As for proving it, we may never know the real story but this thread did a pretty bang-up job proving that the testing lab is state-of-the-art, that multiple hair follicles are tested, that a false positive is almost impossible, and that she could have died. Meanwhile, Nick kept doing booze (and probably coke) for a week after being released from jail - by his own admission.

Your local doctors/pharmacists tell you even with a pregnancy test, 'false negatives' are common, false positives are beyond rare. I assume the same could be said for drug/hair tests.

When Nick tried to pivot to "the black defense" and how cocaine shows up more for blacks when his daughter his white, quite the chuckle.

I received a notification of a new Rekieta tweet, but by the time I clicked, it had already been deleted.
According to the account "ScareBruh", this was the deleted tweet:


Link to @ScareBruh Tweet | Archive

So I understand correctly, Nick accuses @Potentially Criminal of perjury and falsifying his identity as Nick in the STMS chat? I think the simple way to debunk is review the show chat times, then review Sean's practicing courtroom schedule.

Why did Bob & Celeste turn the internet back on?

 

[dustnight]

Just FYI, his chats had the verification checkmark.

All an elaborate ruse by SEAN you really think he wouldn't know how to temporarily change his verified ✓ channel's name and profile photo?

This was Sean in his own stream chat 2 days ago. He doesn't have the verification checkmark thing. How would he even impersonate Nick?
Wyświetl załącznik 6549441

Never said what channel he used.

 

[Freezing Cold]

I received a notification of a new Rekieta tweet, but by the time I clicked, it had already been deleted.
According to the account "ScareBruh", this was the deleted tweet:

Wyświetl załącznik 6549372
Link to @ScareBruh Tweet | Archive

Since I haven't seen the tweet, I can't confirm this, though. And it seems no one had time to properly archive the original nuked tweet.

EDIT:
• Another user ("sneeddaywilliam") showing the tweet with his phone UI | Archive

I saw it too but when I clicked on the tweet he had deleted it and my chance to grab a shot was gone. Glad somebody got a screenshot

 

[Captain Manning]

Let me make sure I understand correctly. Nick accuses @Potentially Criminal of perjury and falsifying his identity as Nick in the STMS chat? I think the simple way to debunk is review the show chat times, then review Sean's practicing courtroom schedule.

You don't even need to do that. It's got the verified checkmark. It's Nick.

Like I say, It's possible that he realized that being in Aaron's chat was a dumb move and is trying to do something about it.

Or maybe he's just trying to hurt Sean. He really wants to push this narrative that Sean is only critical of Nick for money.

Whatever it is, it's dumb though. And amazingly, even he seemed to think so enough to delete the accusation.

Why did Bob & Celeste turn the internet back on?

It's always been on. He's been tweeting and pay-pigging Melton. The theory some (including myself) have advanced is they don't want him streaming.

 

[200MB]

Just FYI, his chats had the verification checkmark. So that's not gonna work. Maybe he had a "moment of clarity" and realized that.

Oh, I'm retarded and didn't even think of that when I made my edit.
The whole point of the verification is so people can't just pretend to be you. Even if Sean was verified he wouldn't be able to change his username and keep his verification. So Nick's master plan would never have worked.

 

[AnOminous]

Rekieta's not pissed at Sean because he talks about him the most.

SEAN SEAN SEAN SEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN! SEEEEEAN!

Imagine being Nick and doing shit that pathetic.

 

[Soi Woh Jak]

Rekieta's not pissed at Sean because he talks about him the most. He doesn't. He's pissed at Sean because Sean has been talking the most truth. Sean is an actual practicing criminal defense attorney who knows what he's talking about. Nick has nothing legitimate to counter that.

Sean is just a nice person and acts like a well maintained man. The Balldo screeches at his very presence because hes very self aware of the contrast and it hurts him so he has to deflect instead of facing it.

 

[AnOminous]

Sean is just a nice person and acts like a well maintained man. The Balldo screeches at his very presence because hes very self aware of the contrast and it hurts him so he has to deflect instead of facing it.

Balldo is very upset that even normies know that everything he says is a lie.

 

[Soi Woh Jak]

Balldo is very upset that even normies know that everything he says is a lie.

Ive never been in the situation but I never understand why people like this can never come clean and just say a big sorry to everybody or at least acknowledge that they fucked up. Im not asking for a struggle session where he is publicly humiliated but its a lot better to apologize publicly than build a tower of lies. Same thing happened to Jack Murphy, Sargon and many others who had the exact same response as Balldo.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

I never understand why people like this can never come clean and just say a big sorry to everybody or at least acknowledge that they fucked up.

The fact that you can never understand it doesn’t mean it can’t be understood. Stick around and take notes.

 

[Sharpeteer]

Ive never been in the situation but I never understand why people like this can never come clean and just say a big sorry to everybody or at least acknowledge that they fucked up. Im not asking for a struggle session where he is publicly humiliated but its a lot better to apologize publicly than build a tower of lies. Same thing happened to Jack Murphy, Sargon and many others who had the exact same response as Balldo.

Have you ever known a junkie in your life? They're all the fucking same.

Nick really isn't special in this way - everything he says, does, or lies about, is so typical.

 

[AnOminous]

struggle session

A struggle session is literally when an insane asshole is demanding people agree to lies.

That's what he did to SEAN SEAN SEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAN! in that insane video.

Nick is incapable of truth. He is a faggot. He is a joke. He lies as often as he breathes.

There is no possible struggle session for him. There is just the wall.

 

[not william stenchever]

Also fun fact: philosophical and legal books on ethics are the most frequently stolen from libraries.

You think I'm making this up:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232934259_Do_ethicists_steal_more_books
Not just that, but the more advanced and esoteric the works are, the more likely they are to be stolen

So books on ethics in law are the male equivalent of books about witchcraft in terms of how likely they are to be stolen?

 

[BrodyDaMan]

There is no way in hell he didn't do gay things with Aaron sleeping in the same bed (four people) high on MDMA/Ecstasy. I can totally see a scenario where the two whores even encouraged it in the moment. Aaron is too prideful to admit it, and even if he ever does come clean he'll just blame it on the mind altering drugs.

When I watched Imholte's appearance on Kino Casino, I thought all his lines about how much Kayla was in love with him and wanted to leave him seemed like cope or at least total lies, due to how exaggerated it was. I wonder if the actual swinging was between Aaron and Nick and the wifeswap was basically a mutually beneficial cover story.

 

[not william stenchever]

SEAN SEAN SEAN SEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN! SEEEEEAN!

Imagine being Nick and doing shit that pathetic.

Rekieta should be beaten with sticks as a public good. It has a decent chance of making him think twice before acting a retarded faggot.

 

[Kanuckski]

Was he really gonna try and pass off his sperging in Aarons chat as Sean pretending to be him?
Sean doesn't need to pull any gay ops for quick cash Nick. He has a real job you fucking mongoloid.

EDIT:
This was Sean in his own stream chat 2 days ago. He doesn't have the verification checkmark thing. How would he even impersonate Nick?
Wyświetl załącznik 6549441

It was probably Sean who had white powder on his nose during the cokestream too, and Sean who went to Hedonism 2.0 as well. All to cause Balldo so much trouble!