- Dołączono
- 14 Lis 2012
I will not speak with Rekieta directly again moving forward. I'm debating just outright blocking his number. He was very obviously trying to fish a pull quote he could use to sink my motion for the recording, despite my affidavit being completely honest. It was a really blatant gambit that might work on your own children or wife, but it doesn't work on another adult man, especially one that is very aware he's talking to a whacked out narcissistic cokehead backed into a corner. His "I'm just talking to you for your own information" ploy wasn't very clever when we were on good terms, but now it's just eye-rolling.Also, does Rekieta’s leaking of the DM’s mean that you’ll stop giving him the benefit of the doubt and post his unfiltered retardation as he posts it?
He tried the "we" stuff in the DMs but I just ignored it because it was asinine, pointless deflection which would only make the conversation less coherent and concise. I was directly, by name, asking him to send a consent affidavit to Hardin, who had also just filed the motion he was discussing either the same day or the day before. There's no ambiguity who "we" is. Why would I want him to consent to the bodycam footage on the Kiwi Farms? That doesn't help. I want a consent affidavit sent to my practicing Minnesota attorney so he can send it to the County Clerk.
If Rekieta wants to say more he's free to register to the Kiwi Farms. I'll even find some way to give him space to post without being overwhelmed. But, talking to him in private is a bad idea because he's very blatantly using it to try and sink my information requests.
: 