Surely the push to digitalise everything and get everyone to be online and contactable all the time has something sinister to it.
I could write a whole post about this (don't have time for a Ted K. larp right now), but I can summarize it like this. There are so many design flaws for how hardware, information/data and UI is designed for the users, it has to be on purpose that it's not really designed to "help" you. You can see on phones that they are more designed to
have access to you, rather than
you having access to information. Phones offers
momentarily convinces with a lot of
negatives in the long run, that can be
easily designed "away" to not be the case.
It's deliberately designed like this and it's 100% with malicious intent.
Putting on my racist hat today, what the fuck is it with middle eastern men and sticking their dick in things they shouldn't like goats, children, ladyboys, their own cousins, etc? Why does it seem like every time I hear about arabs/western asians it's always some kind of violent sex crime or abhorrent affront to God? Is it the heat frying their literal brains out???
Islam fundamental issue can be found in how it's about conquering through wars (it's literally how it started). Its concept only works if you got an endless world (we don't, we are still stuck on earth). So when the world is suddenly limited, they start killing eachother over women and for "their version" of Islam. The religion is literally designed to split up and to rape other factions of the same religion (and others too). This is resulting in breeding the worst kinds of people ever (for a stable civilisation), because it's not trying to create a self sustainable way of having kids (a family) in said group. If it's not about raising the best version of yourself (your kids), morals are out the door and will become hedonistic/an animal (the
"eat, rape, sleep" meme). Also, the middle east also got a lot of nigger mutts, it plays a huge role on the average mental capacity amongs that population, which makes them more prone to be more "animalistic" from the beginning.
See my post on
LGBT, atheist and childless people (after "trying") , with that in mind: Letting
them spread their beliefs or just accepting them living out their lifestyle will always lead to the most vile degeneracy imaginable in the end, it's unavoidable if you don't tackle this with a firm grip,
which we are not, matter infact: we are endorsing it!
Now you know why both demographic groups are more prone to fucking animals, objects and prepubescent kids.
bullshit, we could absolutely survive with the amount of people we have right now. China and other shitholes (again with the racist hat) don't give a fuck about the environment, and elites live like we've got a backup planet. If shit wasn't so unevenly balanced we'd all be doing just fine. A lot of the starvation and poverty on Earth right now isn't from a lack of resources, it's from the manmade bottlenecking of it. Everyone's gotta get paid, so someone's gotta go hungry. Besides, those fucks who made the Georgia Guidestones are all hypocrites who want the filthy poors to stop breeding and stop driving cars and eat beans and rice (or bugs) for every meal while their massive 6-child families eat steak and losbter and run fucking oil companies. Depopulation is a dogwhistle for "kill the poors."
The
"Utopia" clip got
some truth to it: I want you to
really think about it.
Oil is just "old solar energy stored in liquid form". At the moment,
we can live in
equilibrium as you say that we could
at the moment (you are 100% correct on this).
But there is a problem when that oil does end (and it will, maybe not in our lifetime as (((some people))) say). But when it does just
start to get lower, the
equilibrium state for
humans vs. energy is over. It's not about
"when oil ends", it's about
"when oil starts to end". When you ruin any
equilibrium state, nature always goes to a new
equilibrium state , and that transition between the one with
"borrowed solar energy" and the
"one without it" (or "less of it") will be ugly. So I would not throw out the idea of depopulation as an "evil" meme here.
However, I do believe that there are a lot of groups that exploits and subvert this idea into a genocidal revenge project instead (Jews and Arabs towards Europeans is a big one). Also, we got retards who "decides" who the "unfitting ones" are ("democratically voted" politicians decides where gibbs money should go etc). So you are also correct on that a lot of people who uses the depopulation rhetorics, are mostly hypocritical and just use it for their own greed, inferiority complex and to enforce somekind of a humiliation ritual to that ("
eat the bugs, surrounded by niggers and live in pod" meme). We also got Africans that are just too dumb to grap this problem, the most underdeveloped and dumbest continent has 3x the population of Europe, and we are now also importing these
rape monkeys into other continents that are now reproducing like rats. From an ecological perspective, we got an
invasive species that is ruining everything related to the attempts of solving this problem we are discussing. So anyone who is pro "open borders" and has a "think green" agenda is full of shit and should be
[FED post].
You can't be a climate activist and not support TND, it simply just does not compute.
Any
honest arrangement attempt so solve this
population issue seems to be impossible, as you said: everything that is being said about this topic from politicians, activists and other actors/journalists is just bullshit. Everybody is just taking advantage of the situation.
