Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Nope. He has not responded to docket number 68, and the Magistrate explicitly ordered him to do so. So he's missing one.

I wonder how long it'll take for the judge to notice.

Y'know what? I don't think Hardin should point that out unless absolutely necessary. Let the court be as inconvenienced by Greer as Null is.

 

[The Dude]

Wyświetl załącznik 6279918
Wyświetl załącznik 6279925

THE HARM
THAT IS
KIWI
FARMS

Don't mind me, just ending careers here on Kiwi "The Harm" Farms.

Is that anything like the Ayatollah of Rock n' Roll-a?

 

[Hackerzine]

Maybe the Judge should just cut to the chase and write baby’s filing for him. It’d save everyone time.

"Man this fella makes some good points, somebody should make him a judge or something."

We're far enough down the legal rabbit hole that it genuinely would not surprise me if the Judge just says that Russ's other filings are good enough to construe what he would have said in his response to the one he's missing.

 

[Gorton Colu]

I really want Russhole to get confused and mistakenly list the judge as his counsel on these documents.

 

[BIG BILL HELL'S]

Is that anything like the Ayatollah of Rock n' Roll-a?

"Improvise, adapt, overcome" has been Null's unofficial motto the last few years, so I don't see why not.

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

The Harm Farm, A Haiku

When there is some harm
It is from the kiwi farm
I sent you a buck

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Can legal kiwis tell me if this is an actual tort:



What is 'defamation of copyright'?


Also, this is a strange name for a judge:

 

[Not At All A Lizard]

Yeah we should definitely be able to sue people, not just for reviewing something poorly, but for being aware that someone has reviewed something poorly.

If you ignore some person wantonly leaving 1 star you are basically a rapist axe murderer, disgusting.

 

[moorhen]

What is 'defamation of copyright'?

In a perfect world (for Russ) it would be illegal to make fun of things that he makes, even if they're factually bad, because it hurts his widdle disabled feelings.

 

[Clovis]

The farms is built on retards thinking they can post stuff publicly, yet be entirely immune to criticism.

Russ is just defaulting to the standard tard position.

To state the bleedin' obvious, it's so obviously dumb but unfortunately it's convenient for TPTB to collude with the tards, make concerned noises about cyberbullying as they ratchet down freedom of expression.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Can legal kiwis tell me if this is an actual tort:

What is 'defamation of copyright'?

He might mean "injurious falsehood"

"One such tort is called by various names such as 'disparagement of property,' 'slander of goods,' 'commercial disparagement,' and 'trade libel.' The tort is 'now generally referred to as `injurious falsehood.' " Bankwest v. Fidelity Deposit Co., Maryland, 63 F.3d 974 (10th Cir. 1995) "Under Utah law, injurious falsehood combines the two related torts of slander of title and trade libel. To establish a claim for injurious falsehood, plaintiff 'must prove falsity of the statements made, malice, and special damages.' [...] As to the first element of an injurious falsehood claim, although some courts have interpreted the tort more broadly, to be actionable under Utah law, the false statements must either disparage plaintiff's title or the quality of plaintiff's product." IHC Health Servs. Inc. v. ELAP Servs., LLC, Case No. 2:17-cv-01245-JNP-EJF (D. Utah Sep. 28, 2018)

 

[Irene and 22 others]

I can't believe that no one has gone with "A call to harms" yet.

0:21

 

[cromit]

If only his strip mall college could retroactively rescind his paralegal degree for these filings. He essentially submitted unfiltered drool, and not even enough of it to cover everything he was supposed to respond to, and not in a timely fashion, either. Any reputable school would be embarrassed to have certified his non-existent skills.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Nope. He has not responded to docket number 68, and the Magistrate explicitly ordered him to do so. So he's missing one.

68 is just the motion to intervene, which would basically just strike "Kiwi Farms, a website" off because it's not a valid legal entity and substitute in Lolcow, LLC as a defendant instead. I can't really even think of any reason why Russ should even want to oppose it, other than just to be contrary.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I guess I can ask again tomorrow,

I double checked with the clerk, and I was informed that everything he has emailed them has been filed already. Effectively, I guess he just chose to not respond to one of Null's motions

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

He might mean "injurious falsehood"

"One such tort is called by various names such as 'disparagement of property,' 'slander of goods,' 'commercial disparagement,' and 'trade libel.' The tort is 'now generally referred to as `injurious falsehood.' " Bankwest v. Fidelity Deposit Co., Maryland, 63 F.3d 974 (10th Cir. 1995) "Under Utah law, injurious falsehood combines the two related torts of slander of title and trade libel. To establish a claim for injurious falsehood, plaintiff 'must prove falsity of the statements made, malice, and special damages.' [...] As to the first element of an injurious falsehood claim, although some courts have interpreted the tort more broadly, to be actionable under Utah law, the false statements must either disparage plaintiff's title or the quality of plaintiff's product." IHC Health Servs. Inc. v. ELAP Servs., LLC, Case No. 2:17-cv-01245-JNP-EJF (D. Utah Sep. 28, 2018)

Tsk! Tsk! Falling into the same trap as the judge in this case and becoming the plaintiff's lawyer/advocate. This might be an ethics violation due to conflict of interest, Mr. Hardin... People like you are why Russhole gets to ECKSPHLAIN!

Jokes aside, thank-you for making something sensible out of Greer's nonsense.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Jokes aside, thank-you for making something sensible out of Greer's nonsense.

Happy to help.

 

[Belgians in the Congo]

I double checked with the clerk

Appreciated!

 

[The Un-Clit]

I double checked with the clerk, and I was informed that everything he has emailed them has been filed already. Effectively, I guess he just chose to not respond to one of Null's motions

Assuming an unbiased judge (I know, I know) what are the possible consequences for Russhole in ignoring the motion? Does this mean it's automatically granted as unopposed?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

what are the possible consequences for Russhole in ignoring the motion?

It's not really an important motion, so I would just suppose it'd get granted as unopposed.