💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Is this still revenge porn if Aaron sent it people in private?

By the letter of the law, yes. Its a really badly written law and it very EXPLICITLY covers the case of sharing one photo to one person. The law specially re-defines "disseminate" in this context as covering giving something to one person.

The law was supposed to deal with internet revenge porn but when it came to write it, the law was written in an insanely broad way which invites abuse by prosecutors and law enforcement.

By the letter of the law, Geno is also technically guilty of violating it for showing the photo to Keanu.
 
There was a glass crack pipe that tested positive for cocaine found on the list of items.
2 glass containers and a metal pan also tested positive for cocaine. Some methods to cook crack involve a Pyrex in a pan as a double boiler like melting chocolate. Another method for cooking crack is posted below. Nick is a crackhead, they probably smoked crack constantly around a sleeping 9 year old which would explain the hair sample testing so high.
IMG_9451.jpeg
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
By the letter of the law, yes. Its a really badly written law and it very EXPLICITLY covers the case of sharing one photo to one person. The law specially re-defines "disseminate" in this context as covering giving something to one person.
Okay but what if dozens of people have already seen this bitch's nudes in her & lil Nick's quest to solicit bulls & moreover, nobody wants to see her naked? One could argue it was a charity anyone looked at them at all.
 
I was emailed the lab's collection and decontamination protocol by someone out of the blue. I might write a post on it. I held off because we've seen enough retards not understanding how such a small unimaginable quantity can be quantified properly.
Long story short that shouldn't happen, as long as what I read was the procedures they followed.
Even large buildup shouldn't cause such ridiculous results.

Is that true? My understanding of the problem of the crack smoke is that the exposed individual actually is ingesting the substance because it is inhaling the smoke as well (passive smoker). I don’t know if it would justify such a quantity detected in the hair of the child. But I really don’t know much about pharmacokinetics of cocaine. Sometimes lipophilic substances have a higher volume distribution in children.
 
Castle Rock v. Gonzales, No. 04-278 (SCOTUS) and Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36. (D.C Court of Appeals)
Police have no requirement to enforce the law nor is there specific legal duty for police to protect an individual from a crime.
Both cases are absolutely horrendous in context.
You are ultimately responsible for your own safety.
Sure, police have discretion. But [not researching cases], most areas actually do the basic job.
 
I was emailed the lab's collection and decontamination protocol by someone out of the blue. I might write a post on it. I held off because we've seen enough retards not understanding how such a small unimaginable quantity can be quantified properly.
Long story short that shouldn't happen, as long as what I read was the procedures they followed.
Even large buildup shouldn't cause such ridiculous results.


Balldo who grandstanded about not taking nudes when revenge porn of someone who ran a stupid Fediverse instance was dropped created and distributed nude photos of himself and Our Wife? Very fitting, how degenerate.
Is this still revenge porn if Aaron sent it people in private?
Also, why would Aaron possess nude photos of Balldo and Our Wife? I thought they were innocent wyte-dindus being framed by the state, and somehow Eric July was at fault.
Didn’t Rekieta basically makeup with Ralph in order to have a cudgel against ClaireBear and Elissa? Like he’s made up with Ralph 2 times within the last 2 years.

Ralph basically threatened to send Claire’s kids photos of her and her husband that were more or less just photos that were sent to each other that was not pornographic in nature, but included genitalia and boobs because it was basically “I think I got a weird bug bite, should I see a doctor” and the occasional sext (I have no real feelings on that in regards to husbands and wives doing that, but don’t link your texts to something that’ll back it up).

Rekieta’s people have tried to dig shit up on @elb before. Back before his Discord was abandoned and before @Himedall All-seeing Waifu destroyed Locals. Ralph recently threatened @elb again at the behest of Rekieta.

If Aaron still reads the thread, Rekieta has more to lose trying to sue you if you imply that Rekieta is a casual swinger. Gay 90’s has the reputation for rural couples pimping out their wives. Rekieta had Kayla do a softcore photoshoot and went to a swingers resort. If you get sued and go to discovery just show them that.
You can also point out how Rekieta employs a pig monster revenge pornographer to attempt to blackmail his enemies. (Rekieta co-signs all of Ralph’s attacks and possibly paid him).
 
But [not researching cases], most areas actually do the basic job.

Twenty years ago, perhaps. These days, they'll come and arrest you if you're a law abiding citizen who's unlikely to put up a fight, but if you're a hard core criminal who might follow them home after work to find out where they live, chances are they're going to give you a very wide berth.

My local force, they have to hold off announcing drug raids until the morning of the actual raid, because if they announce it at any time before, everybody takes a sick day rather than show up and put themselves at risk.

Problem is, graduates, gays and wammen just aren't as handy with their fists as the ex-military guys used to be.
 
Um. Didn't Mr. Drexel also have a child out of wedlock?
Yeah, but he's gonna go with "but I'm in her life!"

I don't know much about Q (I didn't really pay much attention to that drama at the time), but it sounds to me, in retrospect, he was speaking at least some truth.

Lot of that going around these days.

That nigger ninja’d his way into the house and took the pictures as Qayla believed she was posing for Lt. Worf. Then he spoofed Nick’s number to send them to Arron. All the while cackling about fucking whitey over.
But Nick isn't white. Didn't you hear him? He grew up in the hood. He's an OG nigga.

How could Eric July do this to a fellow black man?

Didn’t Rekieta basically makeup with Ralph in order to have a cudgel against ClaireBear and Elissa?
Unless I'm missing something, they made up a while back at the behest of Dick Masterson (who kept pressing the issue, until it happened).

Either way, he undoubtedly appreciates the cudgel though (which says a lot about him).
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Aaron? Is that you, man?
Aaron is a pathetic husk of a man who intimidates and lays hands on women. His only "virtue" is to be such a poor judge of character that he surrounds himself with wretches more despicable than himself. He likely makes his children's lives worse by his presence currently, and certainly has in the past by allowing Nick to bring cocaine around them. Any repercussion he suffers for his role in this affair is deserved and likely too light. All that to say, no matter how low down I am in life, I can find solace in the fact that I am not that worm.
 
This bulimic soccer mom of a clout goblin is so utterly repugnant I believe anyone who subscribes to her OnlyFans should lose the right to vote. She is such a vile wart on the anus of humanity that she has managed to make herself look less reputable than Aaron in this fiasco. Her toadying for Nick is indefensible, her friendship with April is superficial, and looking at her makes me physically ill. I hope she is sterile.
🎩
Mercifully, she appears to have no desire for children. Let's hope it stays that way.

baby.png
(Xeet | Archive)
never.png
(Xeet | Archive)

ETA: Archive
i really hope I did the thumbnailing correctly, a thousand pardons if I cocked it up
 
It was really odd and clued me in a bit but I didn't make the dots until later (Hence I'm a believer of the "Kayla was cheating on Nick" idea, esp with the massage parlor statement too). Either Q was:
1) Talking shit and just making up that he/someone else fucked Kayla. Many such instances of men doing this, not to mention for minority men where "bagging" a white woman (I cannot find a better term for this phrase, sorry!) is like an achievement to boast amongst dudes.
2) He/someone else was with Kayla somehow
3) Trying to get under Nick/Drexel's skin

The way Nick reacted made me feel there was a degree of truth behind the statement under 2) or 3).

If Kayla and Nick had such a good, "aggressively" monogamous relationship, then Nick may have been surprised (and maybe suspicious), but not that disturbed unless he's a paranoid freak (he's not, see the coke stream). To me, it seems Nick was not sufficently entrenched in whatever he beliefs he had about the person involved.

I doubt Q had anything against Nick because he represented him in a bankruptcy/debt case the next year.

If we are being charitable to Quinton, it may have been a 'I have noticed that she is an immodest woman and Nick should take her under control.' He seemed to be the trad Christian Nick pretended to be.

If we are not charitable, it could have been locker room talk about women and Kayla made a topic of discussion.

No idea, but I doubt Nick and Q had beef.

Yeah Aaron was (well is) kinda dumb for hanging onto that, even after he left the qover. But there seem to be two types of people wrt data - those like Vic who delete everything, obsessively, and those who just don't deal with anything until the phone fills up, presumably like Aaron.

Vic probably deleted it because of the case. Did anyone really believe a 50+ man deletes his messages regularly?

Because Q's mother had a child out of wedlock. Yes its that retarded. If you watch the stream drex was mad that Q's mom dared to give advice despite Q's father "stepped up" to his older brother.

There was more to it than that. Drexel latched on to that as an avenue of attack for 'hypocrisy' (funnily he cannot seem to find it with Nick...) but the issues were much more than that.

idn’t Rekieta basically makeup with Ralph in order to have a cudgel against ClaireBear and Elissa? Like he’s made up with Ralph 2 times within the last 2 years.

Ralph basically threatened to send Claire’s kids photos of her and her husband that were more or less just photos that were sent to each other that was not pornographic in nature, but included genitalia and boobs because it was basically “I think I got a weird bug bite, should I see a doctor” and the occasional sext (I have no real feelings on that in regards to husbands and wives doing that, but don’t link your texts to something that’ll back it up).

Rekieta’s people have tried to dig shit up on @elb before. Back before his Discord was abandoned and before @Himedall All-seeing Waifu destroyed Locals. Ralph recently threatened @elb again at the behest of Rekieta.

If Aaron still reads the thread, Rekieta has more to lose trying to sue you if you imply that Rekieta is a casual swinger. Gay 90’s has the reputation for rural couples pimping out their wives. Rekieta had Kayla do a softcore photoshoot and went to a swingers resort. If you get sued and go to discovery just show them that.
You can also point out how Rekieta employs a pig monster revenge pornographer to attempt to blackmail his enemies. (Rekieta co-signs all of Ralph’s attacks and possibly paid him).

This would be the funniest outcome, but I think Dick motivated this more than anything the first time.

The second time, Nick could have been trying to placate a possible powder keg. He does not seem to enjoy much benefit from the association... If he did enlist Ralph for something, I will laugh so much!
 
and before @Himedall All-seeing Waifu destroyed Locals
Excuse you, she didn't destroy anything. Locals swung through like a drunken sailor on their own.
No idea, but I doubt Nick and Q had beef.
I disagree but there's no real proof either way. Maybe Rekieta represented him knowing he's a shit lawyer or couldn't find a way to withdraw ("He talked shit about my wife" is probably not a reason he'd want in a court filing).
 
Excuse you, she didn't destroy anything. Locals swung through like a drunken sailor on their own.

I disagree but there's no real proof either way. Maybe Rekieta represented him knowing he's a shit lawyer or couldn't find a way to withdraw ("He talked shit about my wife" is probably not a reason he'd want in a court filing).
Himedall didn’t destroy it, but she hastened the fall that would inevitably happen with Rekieta not streaming for months.
 
Crackets is determined to let nothing get in the way of his repeat win of LOTY. Boogie shows some signs of life in his campaign (before DAN I'M BEGGING YOU) so Rekieta had to steal the momentum by telling the world he was such a cuck he used her nudes to interview bulls.
 
Castle Rock v. Gonzales, No. 04-278 (SCOTUS) and Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36. (D.C Court of Appeals)
Police have no requirement to enforce the law nor is there specific legal duty for police to protect an individual from a crime.
Both cases are absolutely horrendous in context.
You are ultimately responsible for your own safety.
These both are progeny, directly or indirectly of DeShaney v. Winnebago Cty. DSS, 489 U.S. 189 (1989). Read this if you want to end up really depressed. It involves a botched CPS investigation of a child who was brutally abused and ultimately beaten into profound retardation due to the inaction of the authorities. While brought under § 1983, it essentially established there is no constitutional right to police protection of any kind.

From the dissent by Justice Blackmun:
Poor Joshua! Victim of repeated attacks by an irresponsible, bullying, cowardly, and intemperate father, and abandoned by respondents, who placed him in a dangerous predicament and who knew or learned what was going on, and yet did essentially nothing except, as the Court revealingly observes, ante at 489 U. S. 193, "dutifully recorded these incidents in [their] files." It is a sad commentary upon American life, and constitutional principles -- so full of late of patriotic fervor and proud proclamations about "liberty and justice for all," that this child, Joshua DeShaney, now is assigned to live out the remainder of his life profoundly retarded. Joshua and his mother, as petitioners here, deserve -- but now are denied by this Court -- the opportunity to have the facts of their case considered in the light of the constitutional protection that 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is meant to provide.
Anyway it's an issue fairly close to my heart that cops are under no obligation to do SHIT for you no matter what's happening, even if a maniac is chopping you up with an axe. They do NOT work for YOU. They work for the Big Club that you're not in.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole