Democratic National Convention 2024

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Null
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia

Who wins the nomination

  • Kamala Harris

    Głosy: 835 33,9%

  • Hillary Clinton

    Głosy: 182 7,4%

  • Gavin Newsom

    Głosy: 123 5,0%

  • Some black woman or gay man

    Głosy: 728 29,6%

  • Taylor Swift

    Głosy: 464 18,8%

  • Other

    Głosy: 130 5,3%
  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    2 462
Wyróżnienie
20201219_032608.jpg
Relevant classic. If Kamala is running, who is her pimp now?
 
I obviously have no vote, but the street battles between the MAGAtards and the Swifties would definitely be the most entertaining election happening, so I guess I'm #TeamTaylor4Prez
 
Irregardless powiedział(a):
The fact that there will still "likely" be 60-70 million votes for Kamala just because she has a D next to her name is troubling enough for anybody who actually gives a shit about the state of the country.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
If it makes you feel any better, a lot of those votes will be because of DNC ballot harvesting, and not really legitimate votes. The number of "vote blue no matter who" are surprisingly small, but they're loud on Twitter, and they have the backing of decades of vote siphoning techniques to pad those numbers. That's not to say there aren't a fuck ton of people who believe Trump is literally Hitler. Most just won't vote.
 
I caught Bidens covid during the week I took my vacation days and its absolutely kicking my ass, I needed this news
Thank you lord, this shit is so funny
 
It doesn't matter who wins the nomination. Obama and the radical bureaucrats will still be the ones pulling the strings.

1721591758742.png
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
WelperHelper99 powiedział(a):
She put black men in jail for minor drug offenses while admitting to smoking pot herself. She a dirty ass hoe.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
I'm struggling with the ho aspect of that. Hypocrite, maybe. Jerk, maybe. But ho - not connecting those dots.

Same for "nagging."
 
Blackhole powiedział(a):
Taylor Swift isn't old enough, you spastic faggot.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Actually, she might be. Barely.

She's 34 now. But she was born on December 13th.

Which means she'd be 35 before assuming office in January.

The Constitution says:

"neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years"

It's unclear as to whether the eligibility is vested in the election, or the assumption of the office.

It might actually be legal. Would almost certainly be challenged though.
 
Brazilian here. Correct me if I am wrong, but Harris didn't have something around of 4% of the intentions of vote in the primaries of 2020? I definitively remember that she never had more than 2 digits in intentions of vote. This is hilarious.
 
Imagine thinking that the man who has reciever ~90% of the shit flinging and having a few percent less points on the polls than the others who haven't seen as much as a single bad ad of them, should drop out so this retarded NOG bitch can take over. Holy fuck, what diversity hire came up with that? Literally nigger pushing from the dems.
 
Captain Manning powiedział(a):
Actually, she might be. Barely.

She's 34 now. But she was born on December 13th.

Which means she'd be 35 before assuming office in January.

The Constitution says:

"neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years"

It's unclear as to whether the eligibility is vested in the election, or the assumption of the office.

It might actually be legal. Would almost certainly be challenged though.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Breckinridge was a contender at 35 (not a serious one, but he had supporters at the DNC), and William Jennings Bryan was 36 when he first ran. The eligibility is usually applied to assumption of office.
 
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole