💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
It would be interesting to cross reference these and see what streams or cancelled streams these dates correspond with.
According to Google, child protection intake is just the reception and initial screening of a report. The reported incident could have happened the same day; it could have happened days or weeks earlier; or the report could turn out to be completely frivolous.

5/16/24 was the report by the pastor.

2/15/23: Late January through February 2023 was the time of the Murdaugh trial and Friday drinking streams. It was also about a month into the Monty lawsuit.Nick streamed for up to 11 hours a day and became increasingly frustrated. The infamous jury analysis rant was on the 7th. There was a break in the trial coverage on the 15th and 16th, but he still did the night shows: one with Dick and the other discussing Monty. Trial coverage picked back up on the 17th.
 
So I'm guessing by nobody talking about it the locals stream either didn't fucking happen and he lied to his audience yesterday  again, or it was so unnoteworthy that nobody even bothered to log it. At this point neither is shocking.

LOCALS streams will happen. He still has 13/14 may streams to do! It's only May 64th!

I've not followed the thread that much over the past few days but found a reference to Celeste and first husband. The sister is listed as Kirsten (Marie MacLean) instead of Kristen. Sorry if late (pg 82).


Honestly it would be hard for me not to defend someone that helped me out like that. From my POV fuck Nick but looking at it from that perspective I get the guy nose guarding.

Thank-you for the tip! This is interesting.

It would be interesting to cross reference these and see what streams or cancelled streams these dates correspond with. Perhaps he made vague snipes, hints or references to these interventions from child services at or around the time.
An event in 2009 with a 14 year clean gap seems a bit one-off, I wonder if it's an actual nothingburger. 2023 seems more in line with the known Balldo Trajectory.
Something I'm not seeing brought up; doing the math in my head, the 2009 case would have to have been in regards to his oldest son right? I haven't exactly memorized the age of the balldo children and I can't exactly hunt it down in the sea of posts, but if his youngest is 9, and his oldest is 16, whatever happened would've occurred before the kid was one or possibly as something they picked up on in the hospital.
Edit: just caught where someone said his first was born in 2007. That makes it significantly more difficult to figure and a lot harder to ignore.
The 2009 one just seems odd. CPS call on a 2 year old in a family with money?
I'm thinking baby had potential neglect/abuse bruises and CPS was tipped off.

I hope to God that isn't the case but it's the only thing I can think of.
EDIT 2: 73-CV-24-2 it's probably a juvenile case which means it can't be accessed through the MCRO website.

In addition to the young child and foster child theory, I will recall to the threads memory that Nick gave some strange advice to a new parent who Super Chatted him in thr range of 2020-2022.

Just put the child down if you can't handle it and walk away. If you don't, bad things might happen.

It was in the context of being tired and exhausted and not being able to put a baby to bed.

Probably worth noting as well, that the hair follicle tests are testing for metabolites that are produced by the body when metabolizing the drug, not the drug itself. So even if hypothetically cocaine was dumped on her head and hair wasn't washed, it's not what the test is testing for.

Cocaine self-metabolises due to the wash process in its creation, so thus is not so straightforward as you make it. It is still much more likely than not that she ingested some of it, but there is important nuance that must be understood.

For incontrovertible evidence, results with ratio of metabolites would need to be reported. Ingestion vs. Passive exposure metabolites differently.
 
It's only May 64th!
Also only September 11,283rd, 1993

Eternal September is when AOL fucked the Internet.
Eternal May is when Rackets fucked... April the sentient Fleshlight, but I bet he claims more.

Nick needs to be hung on the wall.

He could probably just lean on it, with a cigarette and blindfold.
Bear in mind 'hung on the wall' was Racket's way of saying "put up against a wall and shot" to out-lawyer YouTube.

At this point I don't think Rackets deserves a nice sunny wall, or a cigarette.

Incidentally does anyone have 2 spare boats and a quart of honey? I have rope, and Minnesota is full of lakes (and insects).
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
they kept pumping out children
Not only casually pumping out children, Nick talked about doing fertility treatments (Kayla iirc) to make it happen when it wasn't happening spontaneously. Now I don't want to be wrong, I don't know if they had trouble with first pregnancies or later ones. This makes a difference in my mind because if you are neglectful parent of lets say 3 kids, and you put in massive effort to produce more kids to neglect it's really fucking bad. These intake reports may be about kids they took in foster care and might not be about their own kids tho.
 
6138182-1c250601ac34ab9cd09ac9d4508e1cb7.jpg
Here are some clips of Nick's streams around those dates (I believe I've corrected for time zone but can't promise). The most notable correlation is that Nick and Kayla took a kid-free vacation right after each, though it's possible these were pre-arranged.

Feb 15th 2023 - A couple of weeks after the jury analysis meltdown and right around the time Nick discovered Monty's lawyer filed an ethics complaint against him. The Rackets' take a break in Vegas a week or so later.
Feb 6 Rekieta Rants: Jury Analysis is BS

Feb 13 Montagraph v Rekieta Law: Monty’s Lawyer Filed an Ethics Complaint Against Nick

Feb 15 Montagraph’s Lawyer HATES Rekieta

Disregard below - I misread but it says 2024 @Long-time Lurker appreciate the correction.
May 16th 2023 - Appears some DFEing occurred around this date -- Vestiges from Elissa do not speak to a healthy mind, most notably the description of his favorite violent daughter is from this time. Also within a day or so of Nick declaring war against Null specifically (as opposed to the thread in general). This may have prompted Rekieta's June 2023 two-week hiatus and abortive pull up attempt.
May 12 Rekieta’s failed sex dungeon

May 16 Rekieta v KF: w/ Null & I,Hypocrite

May 16? Daughters (inc May 3 favorite daughter violence)

May 17 Tattoos: Rekieta’s Tattoos, & What’s Next

May 17? MDMA changed sense of touch
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Not only casually pumping out children, Nick talked about doing fertility treatments (Kayla iirc) to make it happen when it wasn't happening spontaneously. Now I don't want to be wrong, I don't know if they had trouble with first pregnancies or later ones. This makes a difference in my mind because if you are neglectful parent of lets say 3 kids, and you put in massive effort to produce more kids to neglect it's really fucking bad. These intake reports may be about kids they took in foster care and might not be about their own kids tho.

Normal people, if they are in the shit with the state for child care in 2009, do not get fertility treatments so they can have a kid born around 2016 who then tests positive for cocaine.

Granted, this is *my* version of normal, but I think the fact I don't want to empty a fucking Mossberg 590 into anyone I know counts for something.

edit:
Just a casual reminder that Nick's children are about to spend a second (from what I can tell, major) American holiday away from their parents.

Hopefully they can celebrate their Independence Day.
Have a hotdog for me, dudes.
(I mean a hotdog each, not shared. I'm not your dad)
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Just a casual reminder that Nick's children are about to spend a second (from what I can tell, major) American holiday away from their parents.
Not to sound too pathetic but I find myself randomly thinking of the Rekieta kids throughout the day when I'm doing stuff with/for my own kids and it just makes me sick to my stomach. I hope whoever has them makes sure they have a fun 4th of July.
 
So *if* the Balldos were fostering a child in 2009, and *if* those dates refer to when reports were filed, rather than when a child was taken, maybe the 2009 one is just automatically linked to them and included here (possibly by accident?) because they were the foster parents of a child in the system. Involves a lot of ifs, but maybe that’s best case scenario? Btw, this is pure speculation based on no particular knowledge, other than a couple of comments above.

If it was a foster child, a less innocent explanation could be that the child made negative comments about the Balldos, or the CPS worker was concerned about something. Not even necessarily bad - maybe just something confirming the home was messy fifteen years ago, which will be used against them in this case.

Of course it could be related to abuse or neglect against a foster child or their own, but if they were abusive 15 years ago, it seems like there would be many more reports in the intervening years, similarly to the flurry of reports from May 24 - now.
 
Oh wow nick is doing his very best to remain lolcow of the year!

I'd be interested in any cross references in those intake dates and streams but I don't follow nick stuff anymore, it's just depressing he has no rock bottom at all. Things will just continue to come out and in the end nobody will even be shocked anymore.

Even when the bodycam videos come out with his shithole pig sty of a home, nobody will be shocked because nick has no rock bottom.

He's a fraud and duped a lot of people, he's just a suppositious family man and his appearance is now in the gutter.

Eat shit nick, you make me want to fed post so badly.
 
I have news and evidence that Vallejo’s lawyer does NOT have an office at tamarack village the upscale shopping area. Careful consideration of the address reveals it is box 220 of an ups store in suite 119.

This is literally Greer tier shit.

Confirm or deny I have already won.

Vallejo,? The fuck? Balldo!

1720011092024.png
 
You just don't understand because your life is not exactly the same as Nick's. If only every single thing about you (including the rampant malignant narcissism) was the same, then you could understand!
I wonder if Nick thinks a trial by a jury of his peers means the jury has to be composed of non practicing lawyers with SUDs and extramarital relationships.
 
From the wording and the rules cited it's apparent that Nick, once a stalwart advocate for court transparency until now, must have reacted to a certain spate of unwanted publicity by having his attorney file a June 20th letter asking for an emergency order that the presumptively public court file be made confidential until a "forthcoming Motion for a Protective Order" could be heard on that issue, as well as a June 21st letter request for a phone conference after court clerks refused to schedule one without the judge's say-so.
Strong start, Frank. I liked the citation of the Minnesota rules of civil procedure to try to shortcut things. Shame it didn't work for you. If only you knew that those rules didn't apply to CPS cases. Maybe you did know, but you were hoping the judge would bend the rules for you.

I, sadly, suspect the judge will grant the motion to seal the case file when he eventually hears it, but I hope he is as much of a stickler for the rules going forward as this denial suggests.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole