💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Two points seem to be getting missed:

1. Kayla's parents are or were already foster parents. I am 90% sure of that. I do not know if that status has since lapsed for her mother, or whether it includes her now step-father. I know this because Nick has discussed one of Kayla "siblings" who was actually a foster sibling. Nick said that. It was an ugly story. The kid is now an adult. I believe he discussed it on a summer Locals show from his deck. (I also believe the foster status has been mentioned on this thread a million posts ago. Kayla was in the wedding party for a former foster sib or something.) When I read the leaked CPS court document, I wondered if the foster parents present were, in fact, Kayla's parents considering they may hold that status. It's an odd position for CPS to be in - needing to vet the parents of junkies when they're already foster parents - but perhaps it made their job easier. I find it hard to believe that Kayla's parents would blow off that hearing.
   
   
2. Nick has SAID the kids are okay "NOW" (paraphrasing) in response to a question from a fan. This means to me that they are with family. He would never say that if they were with a random foster family. I'm looking for the source and will edit or post if I find it. He was answering either a Locals question or a Superchat from one of the very recent streams. The Mustang stream, I think,? Perhaps someone will find it before me.

Or Nick is just a liar...

It is not worth much time trying to parse what he says given that court documents and other more reliable sources are available.

I'm convinced the children are with their maternal grandmaw and step grandpaw. They are in the same state as the children, where the children already have a life, friends, and familiarity with the area. MN CPS is not about to ship those children across the entire United States, not unless they have no other choice. The best thing for the children is to look out for their emotional and physical well being.

What would be better to you if you were 16, 14, 7, or 6 (I am making an educated guess on their appx ages because I don't want to read the full dox on them and frankly don't care all that much about their exact age, it is irrevalent) and your parents and 9 year old sister were doing coke?

Getting hauled across the country to be with grandparents you hardly see, in a state you seldem go to, and have no friends there?

OR

Stay in the same area you have almost always known and live with the grandparents you visit more often and keep some semblince of stability and normalcy in your crumbling world, and keep your friends.

I believe the children have some say in their placement, but I may be wrong. I don't have any personal interaction with CPS or foster care

Nick's parents maintain a house close by in the state. They also have more money and watch the children for weeks at a time during the summer. They were also in town prior to the arrest helping with the children driving schedule. Nick's father was at the hearing.

There is also indication that Nick has drawn back from social association with his local in-laws via the decrease in social interaction between his wife and his children and nieces and nephews. There is also the fact that Kayla's sister reported ti her pastor some concerns.

It is speculation where they are, but far from certain.

Yes they do, in the leaked court doc it states that the kids (at least the ones ages 10+) have accessed their right to an attorney. The kids have a guardian ad litem who advocates what they believe the best interest of theI children is, which is after talking to the kids and collaterals. They also have an attorney who advocates for what the children want regardless of whether that attorney believes it is their 'best interest'.

The GAL is court appointed representation as a matter of course.

This does not mean that the children ASKED for a lawyer.

https://mn.gov/guardian-ad-litem/pr...n ad Litem conducts,or property of the child.

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

Kayla's family might be a better choice. At least her sister intervened.

And then they'd either call the authorities and have him hauled off to jail or they'd lose custody themselves. That's the real issue, is can either side of the family be trusted not to allow Balldo or Kayla access either surreptitiously or by being dishrags.

I could see the sister in law calling the authorities....Nick's parents would be pushovers or dindu enabling

 

[pee pee pooner]

The GAL is court appointed representation as a matter of course.

This does not mean that the children ASKED for a lawyer.

https://mn.gov/guardian-ad-litem/pr...n ad Litem conducts,or property of the child.

The children have a lawyer and there is a separate GAL.

This is why I linked info on McKenna's law regarding kids having the right to a lawyer during removal situations. https://clcmn.org/2017/05/01/mckenna-ahrenholz-didnt-know-she-had-a-right-to-an-attorney/

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

Kayla's family might be a better choice. At least her sister intervened.

And then they'd either call the authorities and have him hauled off to jail or they'd lose custody themselves. That's the real issue, is can either side of the family be trusted not to allow Balldo or Kayla access either surreptitiously or by being dishrags.

I could see the sister in law calling the authorities....Nick's parents would be pushovers or dindu enabling

 

[Schpoots]

It's even more fucked up when you realize rekieta knows how fucked up the cps/foster related systems are and still put his kids in a situation that could get them taken away.

His earlier streams were full of him talking about the evils of family court.

 

[Twinkletard]

Nick did something really bad and has known from the start he did something really bad, so he's known his only gameplan is to pretend the entire thing is a government fabrication and that actually he has been perfect trad dad all along and that's why the lib cuck biden wants to destroy him so bad. It's the only way he can hold onto any sort of audience after everything is revealed, because whatever he's done is unacceptable to ANY audience. I hope the neglect and the kid accidentally eating coke or something is the limit of it, but coke makes people fucking evil so I would not be shocked if worse is to come.

Ron Bennington came back from his kid accidentally eating drugs, even if it was a hard road, and that was at a time when drug scandals were a much bigger deal. The fact that Nick isn't even trying for a redemption arc makes it seem like he knows there will be more and worse coming out.

I agree. There's worse stuff coming, more than likely.

 

[Captain Manning]

It's even more fucked up when you realize rekieta knows how fucked up the cps/foster related systems are and still put his kids in a situation that could get them taken away.

His earlier streams were full of him talking about the evils of family court.

He's now counting on people to remember that so they will think he's a gud boi who dindu nuffin.

It's sick.

 

[Smashed & Slamed]

It's horrifying and wrong, but horror stories like those underline how moronic and insane Nick and Kayla Rekieta are acting that the recommendation in the document was that the children not be returned to them.

I think we are giving CPS too much credit.
The reasoning could be a lot more self preservation than real concern or want to do their jobs.
This is a semi famous person that is being talked about in decent sized publications and everyone in the state has heard about. If they are too fucking lenient on such a public case someone might get in actual trouble, or worse be forced to do their job.

 

[Eddy G.]

X / A
I can't see what Ju Ju tweet he's replying to because Dax blocked me.

 

[Sharpeteer]

It's even more fucked up when you realize rekieta knows how fucked up the cps/foster related systems are and still put his kids in a situation that could get them taken away.

His earlier streams were full of him talking about the evils of family court.

He's now counting on people to remember that so they will think he's a gud boi who dindu nuffin.

It's sick.

The phrase that comes to mind is "what have you done for me lately?"

Expressing values years ago means nothing if you've betrayed all those values entirely since. Like how a narcissist will never stop reminding you of how they said that one thing, or they helped you that one time, many years ago.

In Nick's case, he has no values. He's a walking bundle of misery.

 

[Pagan Min]

In Nick's case, he has no values. He's a walking bundle of misery.

With regards to Nick, is that misery just what surrounds him & drags him down, or is the misery what he inflicts upon those unlucky enough to be within his influence? Or should I embrace the power of AND?

 

[ReverendVerse]

This is getting exhausting.

 

[thebigdream]

Wyświetl załącznik 6111278
X / A
I can't see what Ju Ju tweet he's replying to because Dax blocked me.

>brilgiant
I wonder how sober life's treating him?

 

[RotPockets]

Wyświetl załącznik 6111278
X / A
I can't see what Ju Ju tweet he's replying to because Dax blocked me.

His top priority is always seething about Eric July.

 

[Chibitzen]

Wyświetl załącznik 6111308Wyświetl załącznik 6111300
This is getting exhausting.

This is why bodycams are always a good idea.

 

[Eddy G.]

Wyświetl załącznik 6111308Wyświetl załącznik 6111300
This is getting exhausting.

"One day, I get to tell the whole story."
Sounds like Ralph and the """book""" he's writing.

 

[TurdThrower]

His top priority is always seething about Eric July.
Wyświetl załącznik 6111302

The daily average ratio is for him and EVS making posts about Rippa has to be above .500.

 

[Angry Crustacean]

He's now counting on people to remember that so they will think he's a gud boi who dindu nuffin.

It's sick.

Spoiler: Speculation about Nick

I believe Nick has a very poor capacity for theory of mind. He does not think the audience has the ability to notice his rhetorical and factual inconsistencies, nor does he think deeply about the impact his actions have on those around him.

In regards to the audience, he thinks that they should only remember the last thing he said, and becomes quickly frustrated when prior speech or actions are brought up to counter his current point. The frustration is that now he also has to address this new point, and not because he is proven wrong. Despite his stance on a subject changing in the long run, he is unable to change his position in the moment, as his position is determined by proximate need, rather than logic. This could be a good quality in a lawyer advocating for their client, but, ironically, there is little to show he has ever made use of this trait in that regard. Even in the event that a lawyer was able to leverage this trait professionally, it would not behoove them to carry it over into their personal life.

As far as an inability to foresee the consequences his actions may have on those around him, while it is easy to dismiss this as the usual behavior of a hedonist, many have pointed out that they had substance-abusing parents who acted with more regard for their children than Nick. This is where his rampant narcissism become obvious, as he sees his intimate relations as extensions of himself, rather than as other people with minds and emotions of their own. Here is where his potential to unapologetically neglect and abuse his wife and children comes from, and, I think, why the hypothesis that he was dosing his 8 year-old with cocaine to treat her for ADHD is very likely. This deep-seated narcissism is why he can never better himself, as he is unable to admit any failing, and so he continues to find new lows at every turn.

The lack of a developed theory of mind has been made more obvious by his polysubstance abuse. If he had stuck with just whiskey, he may have been able to continue as an alcoholic asshole with a streaming career, but, with the additional abuse of illicit substances, he has descended past the lowest pits of lolcowdom to the point where many who are familiar with his streaming career and this thread actively wish the worst upon him.

I hope he suffers a great deal after he is found guilty. He may suicide prior to a verdict being handed down if the trial does not go well as a means of maintaining control like the craven piece of shit he is.

tl;dr Nick is an insufferable faggot.

edit: grammar

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

Wyświetl załącznik 6111308Wyświetl załącznik 6111300
This is getting exhausting.

Nick calling them 10 times, over the course of 3 hours, acting like the passive-aggressive faggot that he is would be hilarious to listen to.

Nick, you don't sound like a fucking loon at all.

 

[thebigdream]

Spoiler: Speculation about Nick

Spoiler: Gay speculation

This is probably the most well-rounded analysis of Nick I've seen. All of his habits in isolation could've been managed by a better man. There are plenty of respectful hedonists, alcohol enjoyers, executives who do coke on weekends who we never hear about because they understand how to effectively segment their lives. Had Nick possessed some self-control and care for others he could've had it all too. There was nothing stopping him from dumping his kids with the grandparents every now and then and having a fun, sex and drug-fuelled weekend away from the house to cool off, nothing except his narcissistic belief that he knew best, that his needs came before everything else. While he possesses an ability to mimic the characters of others (an ability that is degrading by the day, but nonetheless) he's never shown a capacity to understand why social norms exist and why others follow them. Even now, intervention by his community and government are framed as impositions on HIM, he doesn't seem to grasp the objective circumstance in which they've arisen. He believes that a narrative that plausibly explains the situation will clear his name because he can't seem to conceptualise the existence of facts independent of his narrative.