💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[zimzam88]

this "The Government is out to get me" idea from Nick just doesn't hold water.

The simplest explanation is that he's become paranoid from his coke habit and a retard from alcoholism on top of already being a lying narcissist from birth. That's the easiest way to understand his irrational gubberment rants.

 

[Musashi's Son]

1:01

This piece of shit is already trying to rewrite history. Barnes back then: "Kiwi Farmers want to publish the bodycam footage with the kids in it". Barnes now: "I just wanted to warn the Kiwi Farmers about the publishing of the bodycam footage".

 

[datura_binge]

It's quite possible that Nick sees the writing on the wall for his audience and realizes that the only people he has a chance of keeping on his side are the ultra-conservative anti-government types. Just a thought. He might not be totally delusional, he may be doing it on purpose to try to win those people over since he doesn't have a chance of winning anyone else to his side.

 

[DemsBNutz]

He doesn't need to pay taxes, he's got Barnes on his side. It worked for Wesley Snipes, r-right Balldobros?

If you think about it, Aaron was the perfect guy to keep secrets about Nick's homosexuality. Aaron's so caught up in his own masculinity that he's not going to say how he and Nick touched balldos or whatever sick filth they got up to. The only thing more embarassing then being cucked by Nick Rekieta is having sex with Nick Rekieta.

>defends Jack Murphy
>defends Nick Rekieta
>doubles down on defending Nick Rekieta
>failed skeevy Hollywood celebrity lawyer

I can only imagine the sort of disgusting interests Barnes has.

Is turrets on a bingo card somewhere Aaron or Nick break down and admit My friend and I touc.....

he's wearing 3 rings

Ahh so colar for axfication phase of this degneracy? For when the coke is not enough and all he has left is pepsi zero.

 

[Maraschino]

Nick says that kids today would high five the children of OnlyFans workers who show nudes for money because they think it'd be "cool".

Nick, would kids today high-five kids who are taking massive amounts of cocaine? I'd like to know for research purposes, you delusional cunt.

 

[MudPeople]

IMO the entire 'out to get me' idea goes like this:

Nick used to be a practicing lawyer.
Nick worked to get his clients off which meant going up against various local authorities.
Optional element 1: He seems to be retroactively recasting his low-yield lolyer work as a libertarian crusade against injustice to get in good with his remaining friends.
Optional element 2: He also had it out with at least one more-respected local attorney, as has been discussed at length in the Montysuit thread.
Nick in particular had disagreements with Judge Pussy Liquor, and had the highly unwise elevator girl talk with her.
Nick then becomes a bigtime streamer and continues to poke the eyes of all levels of government.

To me, this seems to be the basis: an almost purely-local 'conspiracy' against him. I don't think he's suggesting the Feds or even the state have it out for him except in vague nudge nudge wink wink cops at Denny's kind of ways.

I was thinking its simple drug-fueled paranoia.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

Maybe.

I just noticed that he was all like "it's not like the kids were on the coke." Then the emergency placement order dropped, and now he's acting very squirrelly. Even critical.

That seemed to be a limit for quite a few people. I was briefly listening to TUG going over the order, and seemed to be experiencing serious difficulty with it too.

Obligatory: Fuck Nick.

If you squint REALLY HARD, until the positive drug test Nick's behavior could be compartmentalized as that of a wannabe rockstar, but surely he was still taking care of his kids and the cops were exaggerating about the state of the crack den to get their drug conviction.

But to have one of the kids test positive for coke (and not just a little coke) breaks that cope wide open. It's so awful that even though it's "possible" the CPS worker lied and the tests were fraudulent, the safety of the child DEMANDS you reconsider everything you previously thought about what was going on in that house.

 

[Long-time Lurker]

I don't think that Nick understands causality.

He understands it, he's just abusing it.

First amphetamines, then alcohol, then coke, then the balldo... and now, causality? How many substances is Nick abusing?

Is there gonna be a third video where he passionately arguing that the hair follicle test was fabricated by the lizard people?

That guy's an idiot. The lizard people have better things to do.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

This piece of shit is already trying to rewrite history. Barnes back then: "Kiwi Farmers want to publish the bodycam footage with the kids in it". Barnes now: "I just wanted to warn the Kiwi Farmers about the publishing of the bodycam footage".

What a disingenuous crook.

From the very beginning, crowdfunding the body cam footage has been about getting a look at the state of the HOUSE. It was assumed the kids faces would be blurred out and if (for some retarded reason) Minnesota didn't do it themselves, Null would have done it himself before putting it on the farms.

Barnes, eat shit you giant tub of lard.

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

My understanding of Rekieta's situation is that the court has not yet considered placing the children with relatives like Bob Rekieta (though he attended the hearing).

Is it typical for CPS? I thought CPS favored putting children with relatives before putting them in the foster system.

It seems to me that it would be a common situation that you have drug addicted fuck up parents, but clean grandparents who want temporary custody.

Why wouldn't CPS have already placed the kids with Bob Rekieta (or other relatives) if Bob was involved with the hearing?

Wyświetl załącznik 6110030

It says CPS must do a "relative search" within 30 days and report to the court the results within 90 days.

This seems like a long time (30 - 90 days) to keep the kids in foster care if extended family is ready and able to take them in.

Does anyone know more about this? Would extended family members have to file a motion if they wanted custody? Is it even possible to get the children placed with extended family right now?

I wonder if family can't or won't take the kids. This seems like an obnoxiously long time to find a family placement

 

[FuckMeGentlyWithAChainsaw]

A guy acting like the dude on Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas is funny to watch in a movie, and it'd probably be funny IRL for about an hour until the novelty wore off then it would just be irritating as shit.

You would hate them the moment they enter the room just like everyone in the movie does. They're dysfunctional druggies that threaten people with knifes and guns for no reason and creep on women.
Very fitting subject for the Rekieta thread though.

 

[Captain Manning]

It's quite possible that Nick sees the writing on the wall for his audience and realizes that the only people he has a chance of keeping on his side are the ultra-conservative anti-government types. Just a thought. He might not be totally delusional, he may be doing it on purpose to try to win those people over since he doesn't have a chance of winning anyone else to his side.

You are conflating conservative with libertarian.

He doesn't have the ultra-conservatives. The ultra-conservatives hate his degeneracy, hate his godlessness, and are not gonna be inclined to show him much mercy on the drug shit.

The ultra-conservatives would probably want to see Nick fry more than anybody. Even more than all the liberal enemies he's made over the years.

Only thing he's got left is the ultra-libertarians and crazy people (but I repeat myself). Man-children who are angry we all live in a society, and that society has rules.

 

[AnOminous]

He didn't cross state lines. If the feds wanted to they could find a reason to press federal charges. There is no indication that will happen. Nick isn't some key right wing figure speaking truth to power.

It doesn't need to cross state lines to be a federal matter, because it's illegal under federal law (based on the goatseated Commerce Clause).

 

[The Internet Dick]

Nick worked to get his clients off which meant going up against various local authorities.

That isn't how it works in small towns and rural counties. Local attorneys aren't viewed as enemies by authorities, at least not on the basis of 'getting clients off'. That just means they're good lawyers and the community (as a whole) likes good lawyers. It's true Rekieta might've pissed off a local judge, but in all probability not enough for her to risk her reputation by conducting a personal vendetta against him. Rekieta's behavior toward cops and judges could certainly poison the well and make locals unkindly disposed against him--more likely, say, to give him a ticket rather than issue a warning. Potential local clients might go with someone else because he's got a shady reputation. Things like that, nothing major.

If Rekieta is planning to base his defense on this supposed hick vs fancy pants rich kid attorney conspiracy narrative, then he will almost certainly catastrophically lose.

The caveat here is I'm not a lawyer. I do, however, know a great deal about small towns and rural communities.

 

[StMaryPiper]

Nick can fix this entire spectacle with a peanut jig of his own?

“Well when the American public discovered I’d been filling my daughter with toxic cocaine. I went on the Dick Masterson show and did a Baldo jig. That’s right you need a Baldo jig of your own yes”

 

[Mikoyan]

That isn't how it works in small towns and rural counties. Local attorneys aren't viewed as enemies by authorities, at least not on the basis of 'getting clients off'. That just means they're good lawyers and the community (as a whole) likes good lawyers. It's true Rekieta might've pissed off a local judge, but in all probability not enough for her to risk her reputation by conducting a personal vendetta against him. Rekieta's behavior toward cops and judges could certainly poison the well and make locals unkindly disposed against him--more likely, say, to give him a ticket rather than issue a warning. Potential local clients might go with someone else because he's got a shady reputation. Things like that, nothing major.

If Rekieta is planning to base his defense on this supposed hick vs fancy pants rich kid attorney conspiracy narrative, then he will almost certainly catastrophically lose.

The caveat here is I'm not a lawyer. I do, however, know a great deal about small towns and rural communities.

Yes. I'm suggesting this is the PR thread and also it's just PR, I don't think the actual defense will go that route. I mean it could, if he's utterly retarded, so it's possible.

Only thing he's got left is the ultra-libertarians and crazy people (but I repeat myself). Man-children who are angry we all live in a society, and that society has rules.

Yeah, he's clearly playing for that crowd now. I think he knows he's lost actual conservatives.

"I just wanted to warn the Kiwi Farmers about the publishing of the bodycam footage".

Everyone on here says they don't want to see the kids. Josh says he'll review the footage and censor it even if something slips through the state. We're not here for the kids, we're here for the house and (less likely it'll be seen) Balldo throwing the paper.

And we'll be here to document and archive when you have your inevitable 'but what if the kid consents' moment, Barnsey.

 

[Captain Manning]

I wonder if family can't or won't take the kids. This seems like an obnoxiously long time to find a family placement

One of the things we don't have a clear read on is where Bob and Celeste are in all this.

You would think a grandparent wouldn't be happy their grandchild was exposed to all this crap, and tested positive for Cocaine, but it wouldn't be the first time rich parents fought like hell to keep their dipshit kid from facing any consequences for their actions.

Without more, I am not sure a family placement would be a good idea. A licensed foster family, otherwise uninvolved in any of this, might be the best thing.

 

[KiwiFarmer9993!]

The only difference between Balldo and Keffals is fake farts and felonies.

Queen Ke-FFals never LARPed as a conservative man with conservative values who married a woman and had 5 children.

He proudly displays his degeneracy and he loves every minute of it, so much so, that he gets off on "pink pilling" little boys to be just like him.

That's the most disgusting thing about it, the hubris and hypocrisy of Nick Rekieta. Preaching conservative values to others during the day, and then doing the exact opposite during the night, like a snake. He is so dishonest and prideful, he thinks he is God's fucking gift to mankind.

It just sets something off in me, and I firmly believe that the sin of pride and arrogance currupts the most out of man, second only to lust.

Nick Rekieta arrogantly thought "I can handle my coke, I am not like the plebians and the lower class who get addicted to it, it could NEVER happen to ME, I know when to stop! I can stop anytime!"

 

[daffodils]

This is all funny and everything, but I notice he released this on the 7th. It's only gotten way worse since then.

Don't worry, a sequel is in the making. He's currently doing "research".

 

[A Cardboard Box]

Does anyone know more about this? Would extended family members have to file a motion if they wanted custody? Is it even possible to get the children placed with extended family right now?

The above are excerpts from a Minnesota DHS training manual. I have made a post in the leak thread, but I will relay the information I have found here. I have spent the last couple of days doing extensive research on this topic.

There are two phases of foster placement, there is "initial placement," which constitutes the immediate, emergent removal of the children and their placement in a safe environment. The second is "permanent placement," which does not mean that the children are permanently removed from the home, or custody of the children by the parents is permanently revoked, but that the children are permanently placed with a household until the completion of the case. The period between these two events is called "permanency planning" or "the move to permanency."

What your document is referring to is the legal requirement that KCHHS to do an extensive search, notification, and assessment of all relatives of the children. This is a legal requirement even if the children have been initially placed with family.

Minnesota DHS internal policy is very clear, that even for the purposes of initial placement, family members with preexisting relationships be considered before anyone else. More importantly, the licensing requirements do not apply to initial placement, and DHS will actively assist any family member willing to be a permanent foster for kinship placement purposes in the licensing process, and will also assist in the application process for any local, state, and federal aid programs.

Edit: to be clear, it is an almost certainty that the children have always been in the care of a close relative, and will continue to be in the care of close relatives for the full duration of the case.