💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
this has been discussed in the other thread but there are reasons they don't automatically place them with family like the risk that the family will just let them have contact with the neglectful abusive parents etc
I guess what I'm asking is why is there a built in time delay? What's the difference between giving the same extended family relative custody after 14 days, 30 days, or 90 days?
 
I guess what I'm asking is why is there a built in time delay? What's the difference between giving the same extended family relative custody after 14 days, 30 days, or 90 days?
Suppose it gives them time to check the mood of the family and also to make sure that extended family are suitable in the first place. Most fucked up parents are two people from fucked up backgrounds themselves, Rackets is an oddity in that regard
 
I guess what I'm asking is why is there a built in time delay? What's the difference between giving the same extended family relative custody after 14 days, 30 days, or 90 days?
I imagine it's a process they probably have to do interviews, home inspections, make sure the paperwork is all in order for them being registered fosters, the fosters probably have to be drug tested also. I have no experience with CPS so I could be totally wrong. It does say that 30-90 days is the longest possible amount of time that CPS has to make their recommendations though so I assume that it can be done faster than that
 
CHIPS case information is publicly available at a public access terminal at a court. Anyone could have looked it up and, if the actual document was there, snapped photos of the screen
The fact those are publicly accessible is a fucking travesty. What's the logic behind allow it?
 

IMG_0378.jpeg
Reminds me of this
 
Barnes is projecting.
Near the end of his segment he started dabbling in walking back some of his observations; real subtle though.

I would not be surprised if Nick continues his speed run and the government claims are further substantiated he's going to either stop commenting on the matter entirely or shortly after issuing a, "well folks, cocaine is a helluva drug"-esque statement.
 
Less youtube cut and taxes how much is that? $700? Which will be going to TWO of his THREE sets of lawyers to come up with a strategy to deal with the damage he did to his criminal and CPS cases to mitigate the damage he did on stream because he can't keep his mouth shut. That's not a net win friend.
He doesn't need to pay taxes, he's got Barnes on his side. It worked for Wesley Snipes, r-right Balldobros?
"HA HA! Wouldn't it be funny if I put the tip of my dick in your ass bra?"
"Only the tip I swear."
"HA HA! Oops I came in your ass bra! Isn't that funny?"
"Now let's kiss"
"Bitches leave!"
If you think about it, Aaron was the perfect guy to keep secrets about Nick's homosexuality. Aaron's so caught up in his own masculinity that he's not going to say how he and Nick touched balldos or whatever sick filth they got up to. The only thing more embarassing then being cucked by Nick Rekieta is having sex with Nick Rekieta.
barnes coping.mp4
Barnes claims that Josh and Kiwi Farms wants to dox the kids because the dude who leaked the documents didn't censor their names properly. Also, he still continues to claim that we are a sick group of people.
>defends Jack Murphy
>defends Nick Rekieta
>doubles down on defending Nick Rekieta
>failed skeevy Hollywood celebrity lawyer

I can only imagine the sort of disgusting interests Barnes has.
 
Fun fact, cocaine is not addictive. Heroine is addictive, alcohol is addictive, but cocaine doesn’t work like that. You could quit cold turkey from one day to the next and be 100% fine. The only “addiction“ quality is entirely mental, it is personal desire and will that makes them keep using. In that instance, when you have five children in a drug den and are doing lines during church service, the question is moral and not medical.
Fun fact, gambling is not addictive. The only "addiction" quality is entirely mental.

You are really not as smart as you think you are.
 
Even then. If you're going to risk your family, to risk it for something as debased as an ounce of coke is so fucking gay. If you risk getting your kids taken away over the jab or maskies that's micro retard dosing. Doing it over an ounce of coke and a whore is mega dosing retard juice.
It's funny because I can absolutely see getting to the point of potentially risking his family in an effort to strive for a fair government. But if your idea of a fair government is "rules for thee and not for me" then you are a fucking idiot. To be a LAWYER and to try to argue that the whole government and legal system is bullshit is literally the most backwoods insane shit I can possibly imagine. I mean it really is. It's crazy. His entire job is to deal in the rules he thinks are bullshit. Maybe he should have been a politician and he would have gotten away with this shit.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole