💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%

  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%

  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%

  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%

  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%
  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Wyróżnienie
DumDum Did Nothing Wrong powiedział(a):
Don't think it's fair to keep legal mindset on the balldo washer list because he's been going in on nick after the details emerged
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
He did a single video entertaining Barnes legal conspiracy theory and then immediately dropped Nick as a retarded addict who should shut up and get a plea deal.
He definitely does not deserve being on Nick's side when they are now running cover for the rekietas by saying the kids are the ones using and dealing the cocaine unironicallly.
 
with the documents confirmed real, i no longer see a path to redemption. the only way out now is some sort of miracle, like if the drug test result was an error and a second test comes back negative instead. but that is all incredibly unlikely.
prior to this i thought that if he got his act together and cleaned himself up, he could recover and rebuild his life to some degree.
but now it's just over, this is past the point of no return. there is no coming back.
 
Woke up this morning to see THIS development... Holy crap, Rackets -- I knew things could take strange turns in this, but YOUR NINE-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER'S HAIR TESTING POSITIVE FOR COKE??? At a level indicative of regular usage, as well??? And not only does your reaction all but confirm that the leaked report is real, but you're quintupling down on these conspiracy-like copes, claiming everyone involved is lying except for you???

Kill yourself. Seriously, just fuckin' kill yourself. You'd do the world a favor by removing yourself from the planet, you fucking waste of DNA.

(Yes, this makes me MATI. Fuck this guy.)
 
Konstantin Romanov powiedział(a):
Not wildly incorrect but a misstatement. Kayla has a charge of neglect by knowing permission of somebody else's child abuse, not of direct child abuse. Nick has a charge of child endangerment (by exposure to drugs) but not abuse. As it stands these charges are a bit wonky because if someone was alleged to have deliberately given a kid drugs, this would be charged under a separate statute 260E.03.18(c)(9)(i) Physical abuse of a child by administering of poison, alcohol, or dangerous, harmful, or controlled substances. This charge has not been levied against either of the Rekietas at this time.

Edit: Misquoted that, that's the definition of physical abuse of a child not the statute. Still, neither of them has a charge of physical abuse by drugging.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
This is actually a little odd. So what I quoted there is the statutory definition of physical abuse of a child by drugging. It's defined for the purposes of mandatory reporting but is referenced in other sections. But it's not a statute. You can't be charged under it and there is no associated penalty.

I've been assuming there was one but I can't actually find a Minnesota statute penalizing supplying or administering controlled substances to a minor. The closest I've got would be
609.235USE OF DRUGS TO INJURE OR FACILITATE CRIME.
Whoever administers to another or causes another to take any poisonous, stupefying, overpowering, narcotic or anesthetic substance with intent thereby to injure or to facilitate the commission of a crime may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.
609.228GREAT BODILY HARM CAUSED BY DISTRIBUTION OF DRUGS.
Whoever proximately causes great bodily harm by, directly or indirectly, unlawfully selling, giving away, bartering, delivering, exchanging, distributing, or administering a controlled substance classified in Schedule I or II may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten years or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or both.
These don't reference minors directly, they would just be aggravated or informed by having a minor victim. The problem is these leave a hypothetical defense that if you give a child drugs with neither the intent nor the actual outcome of injury, they would not apply. There is 1 specific statute which criminalizes administering drugs to minors as an act in itself
152.137METHAMPHETAMINE-RELATED CRIMES INVOLVING CHILDREN AND VULNERABLE ADULTS.
Subd. 2.(b) No person may knowingly cause or permit a child or vulnerable adult to inhale, be exposed to, have contact with, or ingest methamphetamine, a chemical substance [defined as a chemical substance used in the production of methamphetamine], or methamphetamine paraphernalia.
But as you can see it only applies to meth.

I'm not a lawyer and at this point I'm a little lost. Does anyone know definitively if giving coke to children is a crime in Minnesota, and if so which one is it?
 
Nicky boy.
Just to put some sense to it. Say the government did make this up.
The government somehow drugged you for months on end, coked you up, boozed you, and made you act like an ass to everyone around you for over a year +.
Alienating a huge chunk of your fanbase with stupid decisions and remarks.

Assume they magically did all that.
Now, they stopped doing it have you in hot water, and all this shit.
You roll on out acting smug as all shit about it without a care in the world not a smack of decency about you.
Why would that make me believe you? Why would that make me want to defend you? You have the air of a needle dicked prickhead about you and carry on so.
 
For the people that missed Nick's seethe-stream, I made a Summary of his main argument:

Bike_meme - Nick.png
 
Someone should tell Nick that the anti government spergout loses a lot of punch if you are a drug addicted swinger that can't feed his children but give them coke.
 
The Wild and Wonderful Rekietas of Minnesota.

Whiskey drinking, lawsplaining, balldo wearing, cocaine orgies, pill popping, cucking, and their kids tweaking - what do these all have in common? These are just a few of the parts of being a member of the Wild and Wonderful Rekeita Family.
 
Nick looking like a ghoul discussing the documents in reference to his daughter's cocaine use.

He really does go FULL conspiracy mode in the elissa clip video. He really did give off cult leader vibes. Discussing the timing of document leaks etc etc.

nicky3.PNG
 
Wyróżnienie
Musisz się zalogować lub zarejestrować, aby odpowiedzieć.
Wstecz
Top Na dole