🗑️ Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wyróżnienie
AltisticRight powiedział(a):
From this image, I found the device they are likely using.
Wyświetl załącznik 6102141

Then using FDA's website:
Wyświetl załącznik 6102178
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/K201228.pdf
I also found the device the one above superseded.
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/k111925.pdf

Here is their cocaine test, an EIA test.
Wyświetl załącznik 6102180

The cutoff for their devices are indeed 5ng/10ml or 500pg/ml.
Wyświetl załącznik 6102203

Tables. ng/10mg of hair.
Wyświetl załącznik 6102209
Or pg/mg (1 milligram) of hair.
Wyświetl załącznik 6102210

So if Minnesota Monitoring Inc. was using one of Psychemedics' devices, the default reading appears to be ng/10mg or pg/mg. This does make sense concerning the hair required.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
So if the girl tested positive for cocaine, with a reading of 5000 and the machine can read a minimum of 500, she had 10 times the minimum amount in her system?

That sounds like a lot. Is 5000 pictogram/milliliters something that can be converted to a layman's unit of understanding?
 
Screenshot_20240618-235050-328.png
 
Nick just stated that "sensitive documents were released about my family" after he announced tonight's stream.

Nick stated that the documents were supposed to be protected and he's going to have an attorney inquire into what happened. So if this was publicly available to anyone, court staff fucked up majorly. if it wasn't available publicly, someone in particular is going to get fucked for being an idiot
 
I may just be reading between the lines; but Nick saying he'll have a lawyer look into the release of the documents may as well be admitting they're true. You wouldn't waste time or money on bullshit.
 
MaltVinegarRespecter powiedział(a):
That's not how hair follicle tests work. They don't test for the drug they test for metabolites.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
They test for both, don't they? Both the parent drug and the metabolites because that distinguishes between exposure (which again, can lead to false positives for people in drug heavy environments and jobs) and ingestion. All we know is that Audrey tested positive for the parent drug. I mean, I double checked, tell me what I'm missing. I assumed that kids living in a drug den are going to be contaminated with drugs.

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw...cked-drugtested-sergeant-20170309-guuj93.html
https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/defaul.../makela-literature-summary-dtab-june-2014.pdf
https://transparencyproject.org.uk/hair-strand-testing-pitfalls-and-limitations/
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03979
 
Wyróżnienie
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole