I dont care about who is Rekieta's coke dealer, I just want to know at this point, who introduced Rekieta to coke.
<SNIP>
Pure speculation, but I'm betting it was Masterson, maybe Ralph during one of those Killstream road trips or whatever they're called. Seems to align with a couple years ago.
When Nick saw the search warrant he knew immediately all of this was going to happen. I’m sure that’s why he had a panick attack and threw it on the ground. Search warrant > body cams > FOIA > an open look into his life behind the scenes. As soon as he saw the warrant all of it hit him at once. I won’t be surprised if he makes a petition with the court to suppress the footage until after the trial (at the very least) or permanently (in his most optimistic hopes and dreams).
Not a lawfag but while he may be able to suppress it
IF he has cause in limini (sp?) for the actual trial, I believe once it's on the docket, it's public. Albeit requiring the extra step of producing the video In accordance to FOIA laws. I'm sure there are exceptions too.
The last line of this just kills me. But apparently there is no trauma for these kids being ousted from a house in a police raid due to your drugged out parents.
Wyświetl załącznik 6032839
My shriveled black lump of a heart totally didn't break. I totally didn't tear up and neither did my wife when I told her. Nope, not at all. Jesus, please keep and protect this child.
What do you guy reckon the odds are of the kids NOT getting split up?
<SNIP>
Sucks.
I'd say pretty good if they stay with family. We're talking grandparents or maybe an aunt/uncle. Normies that actually love those kids AND will do what has to be done.
If they end up in the "system", it's almost a certainty as would the inevitable cranking out of five little sociopaths.
<SNIP>
Reminds me of a story I heard about how people used to deal with domestic violence back in the old days, out on the farm.
The Baldknobbers (truly funny name in the current context) were a vigilante group in the Ozarks. As many of these things do, they started out to fill a need and perverted into something horrific.
An example of what happened was a case where a man was cheating on his wife and drinking to the detriment of his kids. The Bald... uh group, pulled the guy from his cabin and bull whipped him. He straightened up but caught pneumonia or something months later. The same group came out and harvested his fields, stored and took the harvest to market for him, then sowed the next crop until he recovered.
<SNIP>
Cocaine has no physical withdrawals but booze... and that amount of booze?
I would rather do ten back to back heroin detox's than one serious alcohol one.
<SNIP>
This. DTs can/will absolutely end you. His level? He'll need to be inpatient probably and supported with IV thiamine, B12, niacin and diazepam or similar benzo to suppress life threatening seizures. Nasty business.
An "off books" (which would be stupid legally speaking) program,
that knows what they're doing, can ween him off of it by giving him just enough to tamp down the DTs and ensuring the oral intake of the aforementioned supplements.
In either scenario, hydration and good nutrition are paramount.
They've told every person that asks 3k. They haven't told a single person that it will be less after the initial 3k is paid for additional requests. You're assuming things and calling me dumb with no proof of what you're imagining.
Each request has to be evaluated, each response has to be checked and yes, the responsive videos reviewed to ensure they meet the parameters of the FOIA request AND are still in compliance. The latter's guard rails can change according to court orders, legal contests, etc. BodyCam video is a particularly and weirdly regulated set of data.
Some are easy, find and pull. Others require particular redactions due to HIPPA or privacy.
The more convoluted an incident, the more that has to be done for every request. So typically what happens is a fat wallet, like media or attorney, pays the fee. Then watermarks it and releases it. Once a record is made public, there's nothing stopping the dissemination. The more patient, will get it for free.
There's almost 0 chance someone hasn't paid. And saying that "this works like all other requests for information" makes no sense, because the FBI sorted through thousands of documents, redacted them, and sent me 700 of them on a CD completely free of charge. I didn't even have to pay for shipping, and I can absolutely guarantee 100% without a doubt not a single other person on the planet requested these documents before me.
Wyświetl załącznik 6033467
Data pulls, typically cannot be charged for. There are exceptions such as archival records or records requiring a massive job that chews up CPU cycles. Typically, the query or chron job is written and all that needs to be changed is variables like date, time, incident number etc.
I had queries and some server jobs written that would pull only data selected for public facing responses and you can even have certain fields redacted in documents via data processing by field/column. Manual redaction is not difficult nor would it defeat the threshold for cost recovery, especially in run sheets.
