💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

Friday hearing outcome?

  • DENIED!

    Głosy: 40 9,9%
  • Upheld against Patrick Melton only.

    Głosy: 14 3,5%
  • Upheld against Nicholas Rekieta only.

    Głosy: 12 3,0%
  • Another win for the toe!

    Głosy: 192 47,5%
  • Continuance...

    Głosy: 146 36,1%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    404
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
Did Nick use the balldo on Aaron?

This is the most pressing question right now imho

Man, this is not an image I want in my head, because Nick has talked about using the balldo for vagina penetration, and then his dick to rub the clit... And I unfortunately know what the term "frotting" means... :(
 
One of the many things I fucking HATE about Nick is that he thinks deliberately misleading half-truths somehow make him look more dignified, truthful or intelligent. He did it with his grandfather's will, his sex life, his drug abuse and so many other things.

I'd have much more respect if Nick had just straight up lied about those things. You can confront liars with evidence when you catch them out, and they tend to either show guilt and apologise or just tell you to go fuck yourself. Either way, the façade is dropped and the lie is acknowledged as a fiction. Nick doesn't do that. He can't; to him admitting to a lie is admitting to some error, either factually (i.e., a lie is a false statement), morally (lying makes him feel bad or guilty) or as a failure to properly manipulate a person by telling them a lie they can see through. So he has to intellectualise it and turn it back on the person he lied to. He autistically blinds himself to the way his words will be interpreted and by the inferences the listener will make so that he can use those inferences against the listener later on. And this makes him feel smart. Best example of this was the Michelle Obama/Uncivil Law incident.

I probably deserve some tophats for this, but this sort of slimy behaviour gets under my skin in a way that no amount of regular lying could ever hope to.
 
Legal Mindset going after Randazza is crazy.

Randazza probably 100% understands that Nick can fire him after those comments. He probably knows it is bad form for a lawyer to comment on that.

The point is that Randazza, after probably watching Nick fuck up his own case and providing more billable hours with all those fuck ups, still believes it is important to speak to Nick's friends that they should help him instead of running defense for his addiction.

He is prioritizing his own feelings of regret for not helping a friend with addiction or his earnings as a lawyer.

Grifter lawtubers aren't even paying attention to this part.
Also, as Nick has repeatedly said, the best 1st amendment lawyer was beaten by a strip mall lawyer. He'd probably rather get fired than lose an unwinnable case.

At least Nate and Gosney are calling out mindset. Mindset is clearly upset and projecting it ono everyone else. Barnes has gone full conspiracy theorist though.
 
Judge: Hmm is this constitutionally sound or not hmm. I feel like my retarded vagina juices are flying in direction of yes. This was constitutionally acceptable search.
 
With all this bullshit talk about "Swatting" nick can we get some shoops of the Kompound (we need a good name for Balldo Central™) surrounded by the finest militarized police the world has to offer?

Based on how bad ass Balldo is I'm assuming it took probably tear gas, machine guns, even a chopper.
Idk where I'd begin to try and find a picture of his house, but if you got one, I'll shoop the fuck out of it for you.
 
Still a few pages behind in trying to catch up, but gotta ask this:

Given what a massive hypocrite Balldo-boy is, what are the chances he hires a PR firm to try rehabilitating his public image (in a move completely opposite with everything he pushed re: Vic's situation)?
If he did that'd be hilarious since Amber Heard tried the same thing.
 
why are these idiot fucking lawyers think there's no child neglect, and thinks its because that the house is dirty and thats the reason for the child neglect charge?

didnt they even know that Aaron fed the kids Spaghetti-Os almost everyday? that's a clear case of child neglect
 
Banes easily wins the nose guarding competition with the retaliation cope
Barnes is grifting just like everyone else. But in his case he's licensed to practice in Minnesota so I guarantee he's trying to slide into representing Nick in this prime time court case. So he's already in defense attorney mode.

His hot takes make much more sense in this context.
 
I wonder if Nick can successfully pivot his massive fuck up into rejuvenating his youtuber career by being open and honest about his failures and showing his attempts to do better and make up for his mistakes.

I know that's like asking 'but what if DSP wasn't retarded' or 'what if Bossman stopped doing drugs and saved parts of his winnings', but I suppose it's more of a question of IF Nick did everything right is it even salvageable.

I'm not sure he could recover from this, his niche was being tradcath and wholesome. Now that that's gone, why would any of his core audience not just find new people to watch content of, Nick's content has never been THAT good.

I think he could 100%. If he had a genuine redemption arc people would reward him for it. BUT:

1. He has to stop coping and take accountability. He has to come out and just say "I fucked up, I know I fucked up," with no qualifications or deflections. Nick seems temperamentally incapable of this.

2. Even if he could do this, step two is he has to say "I'm getting off the Internet for a while to fix my life." And then actually disappear off the Internet for like, six months minimum. A year plus would probably be better.

AND THEN eventually, he could come back, and if he has done everything right, and somehow he is still with Kayla, and they have custody of the kids back, IF he went back to doing actual law content and was sober, I think he could have his redemption arc.

So while it's possible in theory, there are just too many hurdles to pass for it to ever really happen, IMO. Nick seems unable to log off the Internet so I think what we are in for is the best case scenario in terms of content: More coping, drama and fuck ups unless/until Nick eventually ends up in jail. He's going to continue his reign as king lolcow.
 
Still a few pages behind in trying to catch up, but gotta ask this:

Given what a massive hypocrite Balldo-boy is, what are the chances he hires a PR firm to try rehabilitating his public image (in a move completely opposite with everything he pushed re: Vic's situation)?
Just watch the smiling friends mr frog episode to see how that'll play out.
 
I'm getting a little triggered at Andrew making these paper thin assumptions without any proof himself like claiming that the mandatory report was the only basis for the search warrant when we haven't seen the probably cause affidavit for the warrant yet. We simply do not know what's in it. Even the lawyer on PPP's show that Andrew highlighted was basically saying he's assuming the mandatory report was not the cause for the warrant.

Edit : Thank god Nate is bringing up this exact part now. Finally someone pushing back against Andrew and Barnes assumptions.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Wstecz
Top Na dole