Wealthy white Louisiana residents win right to form their own city and split from poorer black neighborhoods in landmark court ruling after a 10-year - Critics of the new city say the plan is 'racist' and will create a 'white enclave'


Wealthy white Louisiana residents win right to form their own city and split from poorer black neighborhoods in landmark court ruling after a 10-year battle​

  • St George will have 86,000 residents across a 60-square-mile area
  • Critics of the new city say the plan is 'racist' and will create a 'white enclave'
  • Baton Rouge residents fear move will be economically devastating for their city
Wealthy white Baton Rouge residents have won a decade-long court battle to split from poorer neighborhoods and form their own city with plans for better schools and less crime.

The Louisiana Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the new City of St George could move forward with incorporation, splitting off from the rest of Baton Rouge.

St George will have 86,000 residents across a 60-square-mile area in the southeast of East Baton Rouge Parish and will have its own Mayor and city council.

Supporters of the new city say that the existing city-parish government is poorly run, with high crime rates and bad schools.

Opponents say the movement is 'racist' and will create a 'white enclave' as it separates a wealthy area of the city from the majority Black city and school district.

Leader of an anti-St George campaign group, M.E. Cormier, told the New York Times: 'There is no basis in fact that the existence of St. George is positive or will bring positivity or have a positive impact on any areas of the cities or the parish.'
Plans for St George started nearly 15 years ago when residents decided they would like to start their own school district.

Their plans then grew more ambitious and in 2015 they drew up a proposal to create their own city.

The proposal didn't get enough votes and the movement ground to a halt until 2019, when a second ballot to incorporate St George passed, with 54 percent of residents voting in favor of separation.

A lengthy court battle followed, with Mayor-President Sharon Weston Broome and Mayor Pro Tem Lamont Cole suing St. George organizers soon after the election.

They argued that St George would siphon over $48 million in annual tax revenue from the city-parish government with serious knock-on effects for local services and staff.

They claimed that the loss in revenue would mean services would have to be cut and employees laid off and that St George's proposed internal budget was inaccurate and that they would not be able to be self-sufficient.

Lower courts in Louisiana supported Baton Rouge's arguments, and shot down the proposed new city.

But now the state's Supreme Court has overruled their decisions, saying that the internal budget is balanced and will be able to provide public services, meaning St George can incorporate.

Critics of the St. George proposal argue that it would create a poor, black, and urban Baton Rouge and a wealthy, white, and suburban St. George.

Posting on Facebook, resident Sarah Stelly wrote: 'St George reeks of class division, it's quickly becoming the new worst type of bigotry.'

Another resident, Paul Brady, wrote: 'The segregationist won. I'm no longer a citizen of Baton Rouge. I now live in the white enclave of St George.'

Leader of an anti-St George campaign group, M.E. Cormier, told the New York Times: 'There is no basis in fact that the existence of St. George is positive or will bring positivity or have a positive impact on any areas of the cities or the parish.

'The detanglement, logistically speaking, is going to be an absolute nightmare.'

But Andrew Murrell, a leader of the St George project, told the paper: 'This is the culmination of citizens exercising their constitutional rights.

'Now we begin the process of delivering on our promises of a better city.'

Fellow campaign leader, Norman Browning told The Times: 'I look forward to our ability to build an efficient, productive and vibrant city while contributing to a thriving East Baton Rouge Parish.'

The split campaign emerged out of the ashes of a failed campaign to create a new school district by the wealthy, predominantly white residents of southern Baton Rouge
A 2014 study by the Baton Rouge Area Chamber found that the effects of the partition would be economically devastating for the remainder of Baton Rouge, immediately creating a $53 million budget shortfall.

The study also raised concerns as to whether the remaining portions of Baton Rouge, Louisiana’s state capital, would be able to support public services despite the loss of tax revenue.

As the tables below shows projected figures for St. George would create a town with an average income $30,000 higher than present day Baton Rouge, while the unemployment rate would be halved.

According to figures compiled by the Baton Rouge Area Chamber, the new town would have a majority white population, as opposed to Baton Rouge which has a black majority and the number of people receiving food stamps would also be more than halved.
 
Unironically this. They don't want to exist WITH white people, they want to extract resources from and be in control of whitey. I would have called you a conspiracy theorist years ago for saying this, but every reaction they have to a majority black area losing their white tax base for not managing funds correctly tells you everything you need to know about their intentions. Remember, according to some dumbass who nobody should be paying attention to, the only cure for past slavery is present slavery.
And why white race traitors need to be dealt with with EXTREME prejudice.

White empathy has been white's downfall.

Blacks have ZERO empathy: 404: empathy not found.

There will be NO epiphany 200 years later. Niggers will not wake up one day and realize the wrongs they committed. Black niggers want whites enslaved and in chains forever, lest we deal with these white jackasses throwing the rest of us under the bus for feelzz.
 
"They argued that St George would siphon over $48 million in annual tax revenue from the city-parish government with serious knock-on effects for local services and staff."

What an interesting way to say that. As if they are owed that tax money for existing and people leaving or forming their own city "siphons" their money.
 
Thing is, we'd never be having ANY discussion RE: Plessy v. Ferguson if separate but equal meant that.

Problem is, niggers ruin just about everything they touch. They only want segregation to end as long as they get to enslave white people to build infrastructure and maintain said infrastructure for all eternity while denying them access.

If niggers truly WERE equal to everyone else, and if skin color WAS the ONLY difference (lol, it is NOT), they'd have neighborhoods, town, and enclaves just as nice as any upper middleclass white area.

So, what I'm basically saying is: YES, I am in favor of bringing back segregation.
Sir this is a Wendy's.
 
Sir this is a Wendy's.
Excuse you, IT IS MA'AM.
1714498735451.png
 
Everything is racist if a white person is somehow slightly benefiting from it. Now if they separated for the wealthy blacks and setup new niggerton it would be a brave and stunning move
I think that's what Akon was pushing for a few years back. IIRC it fell through like all ponzi schemes, but got a lot of media praise.
 
So I did some research...St. George wasn't really incorporated into Baton Rouge to begin with. My 2003 atlas sure doesn't show them in the city limits per se and I assume that there was some sort of weird agreement where they could sap tax dollars while not actually providing services.

I'm not sure what ETJ (extra-territorial jurisdiction) rules are in Louisiana but in Texas it creates a nether-zone where residents of those areas can't vote or take advantage of city services, but also can't incorporate of their own unless the parent city allows them to.

You can see that Houston, for instance, has complex rules on what is and isn't the city with some disconnected "limited service" areas to grab the tax dollars from commercial areas while telling residents to shove it. There's weird tentacles like following a single road miles out, and that's all to cock-block anyone from making their own non-Houston Houston suburb.

So in essence, the real truth is even scummier, is that the City of Baton Rouge wanted to live off of the suburban (St. George) tax base indefinitely while refusing to incorporate them into the city, because that means more services but also disrupts the electorate. On a pragmatic scale that makes a lot of sense, but they can't really say that out loud because that would make liberal lies about the electorate and taxing more obvious.
 
If you ever want solid proof that the whole "niggers commit more crime because they're economically disadvantaged" thing is utter bullshit, just look at the crime rates for the richest majority black community (some place in California) and the poorest majority white community (its in Appalachia). The rich blacks still commit far more crimes of all kinds, including theft, than the poor whites. Really gets your noggin joggin'.
 
They argued that St George would siphon over $48 million in annual tax revenue from the city-parish government with serious knock-on effects for local services and staff.

They claimed that the loss in revenue would mean services would have to be cut and employees laid off and that St George's proposed internal budget was inaccurate and that they would not be able to be self-sufficient.
What? is that nigger math?
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole