- Dołączono
- 23 Mar 2022
"Your mother sucks cock at Hedonism!"
💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.
- Twórca wątku Himedall All-seeing Waifu
- Data rozpoczęcia
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Dołączono
- 13 Lip 2017
Can we also mention the funny that is a reporter, like Megan, crying about a person following somebody they don't like?
Like, get real bitch. You forget what profession you're in.
Ostatnio edytowane:
- Dołączono
- 24 Maj 2018
Listen, I could go on a 120 page long dissertation-diatribe about why journalists are antihuman filth and how the "golden era" of journalism is a mythological construct.
However I would rather not derail this thread with that kind of weapons-grade autism so I'll keep it succinct: it's not at all surprising that a reporter is an hypocrite, these are the same people who, in an act similar to how a certain group of well-off politispergs appropriated the term and ideal of being a "worker" to use as a convenient cudgel, have appropriated the term and ideal of "free speech" to use as a convenient shield to deflect any and all criticism; it therefore follows in what passes for a mind in these flesh pods that their actions are for a righteous cause while the actions of those of the out group never have such a justification.
For a very clear example of this, see Taylor "80 year old granny" Lorenz crying about getting doxed and harassed while she goes on to "unmask" and "ask hard hitting questions" using her credentials as a catch-all.
tl;dr : she doesn't forget her profession, hypocrisy is the biggest part of it.
- Dołączono
- 15 Lut 2021
His drunken, edgy 2005 ‘what’s the best thing about sex with a pregnant woman?’ joke was so cringe, made worse by his awkward delivery skinnily squirming around in his seat.
It reminded me of when Chris Chan would try to pull off an edgy joke, or repeat something he thought was cool that he had heard someone else say.
Almost unbearable to watch.
It reminded me of when Chris Chan would try to pull off an edgy joke, or repeat something he thought was cool that he had heard someone else say.
Almost unbearable to watch.
- Dołączono
- 20 Lut 2024
r u sure bby
And just so I am not misunderstood - i believe the only thing she's scared of is loss of shekels and attention due to Nick casting a nasty dark shadow on the whole lawtube sektur. He lifted them up, now he's dragging all of them down.
What she's certainly not scared of is her loss of reputation, or Nick self-harming through alcohol, or thousands of very dumb people, who still unironically watch this, becoming corrupted degenerates because of Nicks' sick concept of what constitutes a good joke (gross perverted shit) or a good movie (gross perverted shit).
Surely, if she'd be scared of any of that, she would never willingly associate with Rekieta or come to his stream.
- Dołączono
- 22 Gru 2022
- Dołączono
- 20 Gru 2022
King Richard!
Anasûrimbor Kellhus
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 9 Maj 2022
that's honestly so vile. I can't imagine thinking about making this joke to anyone (including myself) let alone a normie mom like megan fox. Racket's lack of inhibition is less frightening than the fact that this joke was something he inhibited in the first place.
- Dołączono
- 28 Wrz 2022
i half expected him to say "it's aww-right!"
- Dołączono
- 12 Gru 2022
The names of those links actually make me want to vomit.
- Dołączono
- 13 Lip 2017
Only if they let him.
Look, if she's trying to "fix" Nick (for her own benefit, or otherwise), she's a stupid bimbo. Nobody is gonna fix Nick but Nick. For one thing, he's too far up his own ass.
If anyone in Lawtube is concerned about Nick affecting their reputation, the solution to most of that is to stop going on his fucking show, or inviting him on yours. Sean and Andrew haven't been on in a long time now, and they seem to be doing just fine. He's only the "Lawpope" if you accept him as such. Nobody in a position of actual authority anointed him the "Lawpope."
I don't have any sympathy for the morons that are still hanging around him now. None. This has been going on for too long now for anybody to plead ignorance. Megan knew, or should have known, what a dumpster fire he and his show have become. She got yet another reminder last night.
To be clear: I don't even really advocate for any of these people to actively "disavow" Nick. That's a personal decision on their part. Even if they don't say anything, in time, people will either forget they were ever associated with Nick, or presume they no longer are (again, see Sean and Andrew).
Ostatnio edytowane:
- Dołączono
- 20 Sie 2020
This woman may not say it, but she pities him. If they were friends before he transformed into a balldo, she is probably wondering what this doppelganger did to her friend.
- Dołączono
- 15 Kwi 2019
This has inspired me to adapt a DJ Steve Porter classic.
- Dołączono
- 20 Lut 2024
I agree with your take, except of this bit above - i used to think like that even just couple weeks ago, but my opinion is changing now.
Yes they should disavow him. Now is the time. Now, that they know what movies he likes, what makes him happy, how he treats decent people, how he fraternizes with revolting people, how he disrespects God, people who love God, his own wife, his own kids, his own community, or even the animals.
What are they waiting for? What sort of joke or comment is gonna make them go "okay that's it"? There is a pattern. There is a clear path that he is traveling on, the direction of which is visible to anyone. Plus, there is a bit of urgency in that he's destroying his body rapidly. Disavowing him only when he's dead will be extremely distasteful and pointless.
Now is the time. It's no longer acceptable that Jersh is carrying that cross alone. There were dozens, or maybe even hundreds of people hosting or being guests with Nick - disavowers' strength is in numbers.
Here's my autistic/creative idea for a video - a Shark Tank, but with all those people making a one line comment to justify why they cut the ties:
- he said he hates Christmas, and for that reason - I'm out
- he asked me if I want to attend an underwear party in a gay bar, and for that reason - I'm out
- he seems obsessed with American Beauty, and for that reason - I'm out
etc. etc. etc.
They wouldn't have to grovel, apologize for 'not seeing the signs', explain the reasoning in long paragraphs, expose themselves to further criticism, be emotional about it or anything. Just one line (it could be funny, silly or serious - doesn't matter), supported by a quick clip from Rekietas' stream or his tweet as evidence - and that's it, never come back to the subject again. 80 one-line comments from 80 different people is far more powerful than 5 of them explaining the issue in detail. If people would be sending them superchats or asking about it on other streams afterwards, they could just say - 'I have already stated in this video that I am done with Nick, so let's move on'.
Additionally, it would protect them from feeling pressured into involving themselves in quarrels with Nick, if he would start yapping back: 'wow it's so unfair they clipped it all out of context' - yeah, that won't work if there are dozens of clips and dozens of streamers saying they disavow. They could just ignore him, their combined strength would serve as the best defense.
- he said he hates Christmas, and for that reason - I'm out
- he asked me if I want to attend an underwear party in a gay bar, and for that reason - I'm out
- he seems obsessed with American Beauty, and for that reason - I'm out
etc. etc. etc.
They wouldn't have to grovel, apologize for 'not seeing the signs', explain the reasoning in long paragraphs, expose themselves to further criticism, be emotional about it or anything. Just one line (it could be funny, silly or serious - doesn't matter), supported by a quick clip from Rekietas' stream or his tweet as evidence - and that's it, never come back to the subject again. 80 one-line comments from 80 different people is far more powerful than 5 of them explaining the issue in detail. If people would be sending them superchats or asking about it on other streams afterwards, they could just say - 'I have already stated in this video that I am done with Nick, so let's move on'.
Additionally, it would protect them from feeling pressured into involving themselves in quarrels with Nick, if he would start yapping back: 'wow it's so unfair they clipped it all out of context' - yeah, that won't work if there are dozens of clips and dozens of streamers saying they disavow. They could just ignore him, their combined strength would serve as the best defense.
That would save the time that will be otherwise inevitably wasted on drama and pointless explanations in the future. Just say it now and be done with it. Don't try to climb into a dumpster on fire, don't pretend you're a firefighter, don't ignore that it's burning - just state "there is a fire, so I am fucking off from here' - and leave.
Ostatnio edytowane:
- Dołączono
- 9 Sty 2023
None of them are "friends". None of them have ever been "friends". It's all opportunistic leeching and if any of them believe they are actually "friends" they are retarded and deserve what happens next.
- Dołączono
- 27 Paź 2023
- Dołączono
- 25 Gru 2017
It wasn’t a mythological construct.
The golden age of journalism was a time when journalists had near total control over public opinion and any and all lies and slants would be 100% believes. This was between the 1870’s and the 1950’s.
I agree with everything else you said, but sadly YouTubers and streamers and Twitter have kept that spirit of hypocrisy and misinformation alive
- Dołączono
- 24 Maj 2023
- Dołączono
- 22 Gru 2022
Kinda torn on this. Agree in theory, but in practice, the thing is, Nick thrives on attention & also loves playing the victim. What he fears most isn’t being the villain but becoming irrelevant. He deserves people to ghost him & if he’s mentioned say “Who? Don’t know him.” (Josh is uniquely situated because he already disengaged but talking about lolcow of the year when doing MATI is difficult to avoid)
On the other hand, it would be nice to see someone besides Josh have the integrity to call him on his bs, either to his face or otherwise.
Bizarrely, there are some who are flocking to Nick more than ever lately. Checked out Nick’s stream last night for literally two minutes, quickly realized what a mistake that was & immediately dipped. But saw in the chat that Dani Ahn (Mormon lawyer from Utah, besties with Legal Vices) is a mod (no idea if that’s a new thing?)
Apparently, she’s a fan of Nick’s “comedy”.
Forget who here asked or why, about a woman named Nicola Maxwell that was in Nick’s YT or Locals comments, but she is a mod now too.
Aside from Dani & Nicola being inexplicably enamored with Nick, it’s clear they are retarded and/or psychotic because they are both super fans of Steve Gosney’s 50 Shades of Grey knock off book. Steve’s another one who should know better about Nick.