why do kiwifarm mods themselves endorse literal c** p** , while banning users for mere jokes? - what's the source of this dissonance?

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

theshitposter

cyberpunk bully
kiwifarms.net
Dołączono
7 Sie 2020
sjsjsnsnnsj.png
 
So if I were to post the album cover for Scorpions' Virgin Killer on here, it would be OK because it's art, right?
Well if its similar to the posted messages dilemma you could post a link to the 'art' but not post the (((art))) itself

I think the main thrust here is to probably avoid hosting images of naked minors

However you should probably talk to staff before doing something incredibly autistic and pushing your nose on the banline just cause you can
 
So if I were to post the album cover for Scorpions' Virgin Killer on here, it would be OK because it's art, right?
Do you honestly think we should ban links to Wikipedia for the pages of this album and the napalm girl in Vietnam?

I know you're butthurt about your dumb faggot friends getting banned for being insufferable, but this logic is just tortured.
 
Do you honestly think we should ban links to Wikipedia for the pages of this album and the napalm girl in Vietnam?

I know you're butthurt about your dumb faggot friends getting banned for being insufferable, but this logic is just tortured.
Oh really? And which users would you be referring to? You might have me confused with someone else.
 
If you can’t tell the difference between a photojournalist essay on child prostitution and actual pornography, you should probably see a therapist. Nothing about them is arousing and they are not made or framed to be. You’d have to be a pedophile sadist to think they are.

However, I fully understand why they ought not to be posted on the site.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole