Census 2023: Political Identity

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Null
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia

How do you self-identify politically?

  • Apolitical or Undecided

    Głosy: 590 11,5%
  • Authoritarian

    Głosy: 338 6,6%
  • Conservative

    Głosy: 852 16,6%
  • Centrist

    Głosy: 767 15,0%
  • Liberal

    Głosy: 349 6,8%
  • Progressive

    Głosy: 236 4,6%
  • Libertarian or "Classical Liberal"

    Głosy: 842 16,4%
  • Anarchist

    Głosy: 160 3,1%
  • Other

    Głosy: 642 12,5%
  • Refuse to Answer

    Głosy: 350 6,8%

  • Łączna liczba głosujących
    5 126
  • Ankieta zamknięta .
I do not agree with "apolitical" and "undecided" being the same category.

Someone living in a religious sect who actively avoids the news and government and abstains from voting may be apolitical.

Someone who guzzles news and doesn't know if they should be a neoconservative or a radical liberal, who has strong opinions and posts on /pol/ all day long may be "undecided."

These groups should not be lumped together. Especially if part of the point of the census is trying to figure out what portion of the forum is highly politicized.

As such, I refuse to answer. I'd otherwise say apolitical though.
 
Another proud moment in Lolbert history: Kansas permits Schlitterbahn Water Park to self-regulate its safety and maintenance standards resulting in the creation of an SA Goon Project style Death Slide that injured over a dozen people and decapitated the child of a state representative.
there was a good video debunking that article by praxben basically the bear problem was always a thing but was over blown to slander the libertarians and support democrats
 
If I told you my views on healthcare and energy, you'd call me a socialist, on gays and lesbians, a liberal, on immigration and trannies, a Nazi. I also believe in compulsory military service. Since there's no specific name for this ideology, I just chose "other".
 
Given my opinions are the most sensible, I'm obviously a centrist. The people who disagree with me on one side are much more worthwhile than the hollywood-brained masses on the other, so it balances out.

Okay define i believe people have right to kill themselves and do whatever to their bodies including copius amount of drugs and ban narcan.

And the inquisition was right about western women and gays and had the right way to handle them burnings on the stake.

What political leanings is that?
Deeply conflicted. What might help is the understanding that legalistic freedom is designed around assumptions about a population. If someone doesn't fit the mold of trustworthiness and good nature, then there is nothing wrong with denying them any and all rights. Nobody should expect the right to speak extended to them for the purpose of spreading debauchery. Freedom exists to prevent cutting off positive possibilities before they could be known, not to allow people to commit crimes against society and culture just because they have high verbal intelligence and money to throw around.

In other words, going full anglo legalism, where you pretend everything can or should be formalized into law or contract, is retarded. There always exists a place for divine authority, and no society prospers without a conscious respect for it above the law. Forgetting this inevitably allows those of despicable nature to worm their way in and take up those loose ends for their own sordid purposes.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
I self-identify as a sneedsexual, and I was very triggered to not see that listed as an option. Do. Better.
 
Yes because the spergfire needs more kindling and chaos. This way people can disingenuously cite this poll at each other in flame wars. Jersh loves people arguing for pages and pages about definitions, insulting each other, bad faith criticism, and especially he loves you tagging him in every shitfit that happens on the forum
Thanks! As a new user, this is good to know. I can only hope every other new user follows your advice! I'm sure Jersh would appreciate that
 
Screenshot_20230904-212116_Trebuchet_1.png
Screenshot_20230904-211838_Trebuchet_1.png Screenshot_20230904-211826_Trebuchet_1.png


> posts schizo-take
 
Ostatnio edytowane przez moderatora:
I chose other because I'm more of a separatist, not really a political ideology but it's something I like to root for more than anarchy or authoritarianism.
 
I guess I consider myself a "New Deal era Democrat" but I am not sure if that counts as "progressive". I am quite far left when it comes to things like labor rights, social programs and economic equality, but it seems the modern day "progressive" movement cares only about IDpol and not much else. Yes, there should be social equality, but that does not mean much without a roof over your head or food on the table.

Plus, my refusal to indulge troons in their mental illness makes me a pariah among many other people on the political left, as does my pro-nuclear energy stance compared to most environmentalists.
 
Wstecz
Top Na dole