2023-09-23 - Nitasha Tiku: conversationMedia request for comment from The Washington Post

  • Twórca wątku Twórca wątku Null
  • Data rozpoczęcia Data rozpoczęcia
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
The objective is to criminalize wrongthink. They don't care about the ideological coherence of it.
That might be also true, but I am convinced they do this shit with malice.
I hate how this in particular rationalizes hugboxes, as any critique in any way, shape or form, has a chance of making someone kill themselves, so you'd better say nothing at all, ever.
 
I imagine there is a nervousness stirring around the potential legal or reputational blowback that might result from those varied underhand and unsuccessful attempts to drive this site offline. A narrative is being constructed. As a result I think that we can expect to see more of these articles. I would be interested to know whether the impetus for this piece originated in-house, or is the result of someone with vested interests contacting one the useful idiots who they keep on file (the useful idiot in this case would be you, Nitasha).

As someone who was also at one time, a dumb as fuck print journalist, I can confirm that, within what can very loosely be described as the trade, broadsheet writers are the absolute worst. (I quite liked some of the tabloid reporters. They at least harboured no illusions regarding what they were). Incredibly the profession has worsened since I left.
 
At this point won't this just be another nothingburger? Even libfags don't give a shit about this stuff anymore, the fatigue is real. People are more worried about affording rent and food not some fucking website that laughs at retards. These clowns don't realize the fucking circus has moved on.
 
At this point won't this just be another nothingburger? Even libfags don't give a shit about this stuff anymore, the fatigue is real. People are more worried about affording rent and food not some fucking website that laughs at retards. These clowns don't realize the fucking circus has moved on.
WaPo is writing it for their readership: terminally-online shitlibs who can't function without a daily or hourly Two Minutes Hate.
 
Jewsh, why not take this opportunity to straighten out the record a bit, give them a bit of insight in how this is all being held together. I'm sure she'd love to hear about how once per month we all collate and perform a ritual sacrifice of a transgender colored sheep, wherein you plunge an arcane dagger into it, collect it's blood in a sippy cup and pour it onto your router. If more people knew that keeping websites live was as easy as black magic, they may surrender.
 
I was curious where else she has worked. She is an ex-BuzzFeed News employee. Speaks for quality of her work, I suppose, or lack thereof.
000089.png
 
Because if the mainstream media put out daily articles about how Jews are destroying the country and brave patriots need to fight back to stop it, nobody can reliably predict which synagogue is going to end up getting bombed, but they can reliably expect that it'll happen more often as anti-Jewish sentiment increases.
Sure,but going further with this they ignore any issues violating any sense of journalistic integrity they might believe in. Not to mention it encourages those certain groups to do of more of the same.
One thing is not reporting terrostic acts of violence to limit their spread, the other giving a green light to any group with such special protection to continue their behavior because "YOU CAN'T JUST SAY BAD THINGS ABOUT THEM".
Even recently, troons were defending that trans shooter because it's the society which was at fault, by no means the mentally ill person.
 
Ostatnio edytowane:
Sure,but going further with this they ignore any issues violating any sense of journalistic integrity they might believe in. Not to mention it encourages those certain groups to do of more of the same.
One thing is not reporting terrostic acts of violence to limit their spread, the other giving a green light to any group with such special protection to continue their behavior.
Yes, journalists are subhuman trash.
 
Proud of modern journalists to have taken the paycut from their McDonald's gig to write amoral propaganda as the unskilled mouthpieces of the elite who wouldn't piss on them if they were on fire. It takes a special kind of individual to claim to fight for free speech and truth as the purpose of their existence while writing a dishonest hit piece against a website that is being unprecedentedly punished for exercising their legal right to free speech.
 
Jewsh, why not take this opportunity to straighten out the record a bit, give them a bit of insight in how this is all being held together. I'm sure she'd love to hear about how once per month we all collate and perform a ritual sacrifice of a transgender colored sheep, wherein you plunge an arcane dagger into it, collect it's blood in a sippy cup and pour it onto your router. If more people knew that keeping websites live was as easy as black magic, they may surrender.
She sends an email.askong for comment literally a day before its published. This means the article has already been written and they want to either justify "We reached out for comment but did not hear back" line in the article, or else find a choice quote to put out of context.

You are never going to set the record straight in a publication like the Washington Post. It's a quasi state run entity that exists for the sole purpose of manufacturing consent and writing citations for lies in wikipedia.
 
Pls tell her that the kills trannies have collected is higher then the imgainary kill count of a few online shitposters.
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole