💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abusing puppy snuffing cuckold who dosed his child, "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse streamer. Swinger visitor of 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Seethed at his ex-BF Aaron on REDDIT. Wife's gunted and toed bod worth $50. Drives like a Jeet.

[Balldo's Gate]

Again, I am forced to assume this is his gambit, and he wanted moderation actions without asking for it, because he knows he can't ask for it as that is a liability if it were screencapped and shared. And since we never had a "meeting of the minds" on this, now he's going to warp it the other way and make it sound like I was offering and he declined, when the reality is I was preemptively making sure he knew that was not on the table.

Based solely on his on air conduct, Nick's drinking has escalated since around last spring, and I'm guessing that a significant amount of his time is spent either being drunk and lashing out in various ways that make him feel good in the moment or cleaning up drunken lashing out that he did before. That's why it didn't surprise me in the slightest that this latest conversation took place at midnight Central, or indeed any time between, say, 10pm and 8-9 am. The bulk of what we've discussed in the thread has been when it happens on stream but there's no reason to expect that the seething verging to anger starts and stops on air. And it's been about various people and things at various times, not just about KF.

He has a victim narrative he has created in his head, but the problem both that he doesn't want to be seen as claiming victim status AND after nearly a year he still hasn't managed to come up with an argument he can present in public that he has been wronged in some way by you or even the thread. Or at least not one that's not nonsensical. He just has an extremely vague belief that anyone criticizing him must be both incorrect and malicious.

I think his ideal world would be one where his thread to went back to the way it was pre-November 2022, but I'm not sure the extent to which he has a concrete plan for how he thinks that could be accomplished.

So he tries to paint the thread as problematic. Saying there's life ruination and line crossing there when the thread is pretty tame. If he wants to see threads with a shitty hivemind he should look at the plagued threads.

He does not want to give usernames, posts or concrete example simply because he does not have any concrete justified example of crossing the line.
In his head, the thread is fog of negativity. Nothing solid to point out to.

Saying that Drexel was joking about the mother and daughter for years (lol) or that that story is old or meant to be a cautionary tale or whatever. or pulling "If I Did It" style discussions about travel destinations in DMs is absurd but ultimately harmless.

But that was a cowardly, shameful smear which he decided to make in public. When challenged to provide evidence, he offered to talk in private (where presumably he would provide the evidence he was talking about) but he apparently backed down instead.

If I recall correctly, and it has been a few months, that claim initially came out of his discussion with Sean on one of the Friday "funstreams". If that's right then that's an instance where Nick has gotten drunk and said something that made him feel good and then had to row back on it when he sobered up.

Man this is like the judge in the elevator thing all over again.

The judge in the elevator is now the judge presiding over his defamation case with Montagraph, by the way. In case you wanted to know how that one ended up turning out for him.

 

[AnOminous]

I don't think that Rekieta is lying but it this is his personal perspective on these conversations that he and Josh seem to be having.

If he isn't lying and that actually is his perspective instead of the obviously manipulative bullshit it looks like, then his mind is completely warped by massive drug abuse, boozing and coom, and he needs to get help.

 

[Fools Idol]

If he isn't lying and that actually is his perspective instead of the obviously manipulative bullshit it looks like, then his mind is completely warped by massive drug abuse, boozing and coom, and he needs to get help.

Sounds about right.

 

[Hiphopopotamus]

Looks like we got a follow up Locals stream regarding Null v Drex
https://youtube.com/watch?v=LRhbaRXtyUY

Spoiler: Archive

Rekieta v Null： Why Josh Hates Drex.mp4

So Nick, a man that has children, is mad that Drex, a man who grooms children, is getting shit on by Josh, an autistic man that hates pedophiles? Did I miss something?
He said something about Drex "being a bull" too, is this Nick's wife's bull now?

I am concerned for children of pedo-defenders.

Edited for factual allegations.

 

[waffle]

I will endeavor to write more about Nicks pathetic cope takedown of Null later, but as a fellow stripmall lawyer, game knows game. Nick is being maavely disingenuous and trying so hard (and inafrtuly) to get ahead of the avalanche of being called bitch-made he can fell starting about what a fag he's being.

How fucked up and on what substances was when he when he made this cope video?

Does Nick ever text Null in the shower to talk about how how Null is "getting manipulated" or "misinterpreting" in regard to anyone that isn't Nick or directly in his retinue? Null broke the seal on DMs, you can tell us your specific examples - Nick.

I grant I'm grumpy-boy live reaacting here a bit. But I will do what, by his own description Nick is refusing to do for Null and cite a specific criticism about how he is being disingenuous as fuck: "I don't burn bridges with people, maybe I cause it -I don't know". Yes you do know you homo. You passive-aggressively called Null an autistic robot after you refused several times to provide specific examples of instances in your thread of people engaging in the behaviors you were alleging and he felt like he needed specific examples to engage in productive discussion on the topic. Wow, what advocacy skills it's almost like you know you're full of shit and were (and are) just trying to bully Null into caving to you.

I believe I have Nick's number. Nick is a little bitch boy who keeps people in his social circle in line by female-typical bullying tactics. Like right now he's clearly trying to bate Null into releasing the full DM's. The only question is does Nick want this so he can coup-count some victim points, or because he wants to counter-release some other shief of DM's.

 

[Pitbull Victim]

Hahaha I can't believe this fucking faggot tried to pull his own "girl-talk" because people were being too mean on the Internet.

Nick's Dong is Gone. Only Balldo Remains.

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

Speaking of Montegraph, if Nick loses will we get a #PayMonty saga?

It might be time to sacrifice Rekieta to the corn.

 

[RotPockets]

The judge in the elevator is now the judge presiding over his defamation case with Montagraph, by the way. In case you wanted to know how that one ended up turning out for him.

*chef’s kiss*

 

[Spaded Dave]

@Null Just in case you wanted one of many direct things to respond to on MATI right from Drexel's mouth I have re-archived the below for you. In this he explicitly mentions the age "13 or 14". This is also something from long after the backlash started so this is his defensive telling of the story in a way that he thinks makes himself look good and it is still disgusting.

I hope one of my fellow Kiwis endeavors to link or provide a more thorough compilation but I unfortunately don't have the time right now. This is just the first one that popped into my head. Assuming you're interested in actually responding to this, obviously.

 

[Hal]

Speaking of Montegraph, if Nick loses will we get a #PayMonty saga?

It might be time to sacrifice Rekieta to the corn.

No stalker child he will NOT pay the terrorist cyber stalker known as montagraph

 

[Pelican Bones]

People watched an obviously alcoholic lawyer say "I'm a grifter" and everyone laughed it off as a joke.

They watched him act like a cam whore and do things that should humiliate a grown man.

They watched him and his token talk about artificial wombs.

They still belive his version of the judge story.

"Fame/money got to him. He's changed." No. Fame and money don't change you, it just exposes your character for what it really is.

Even with all of this, people are hoping for a redemption arc. There will be no redemption arc. He will not pull up. He is everything he told you he was, you just didn't believe him.

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

No stalker child he will NOT pay the terrorist cyber stalker known as montagraph

Nick already has incel prudes as his stalker childs. He doesn’t need to crib Fatrick’s style.

 

[Some Dumb Faggot]

Clipped the full segment where he bitches about @Null, it's about what you would expect. He goes on about how Drexel is misunderstood and how Josh is being manipulated by some group of people and again claims people in this thread break the rules without saying who even though they should be reported if they actually are breaking the rules. He also keeps bringing up how "funny" all of this is and claims Josh is afraid of his own site for some reason


Nick Null rant.mp4

Same Vibes

 

[SpergioLeonne]

Nick needs a fucking exorcism. He looks like shit, his narrative is transparent like a toddler, he’s clutching his whisky and lithping, and I think he’s possessed by the balldo demon

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

is mad that Drex, a man who rapes (grooms?) children,

Far be it from me to defend Drexel, but I know of zero evidence Drex has raped anyone, children or otherwise. The narrative he's a groomer has far more evidence, don't muddy the waters with baseless shit.

 

[Artificial Stupidity]

Hey null you hate drex because he's black, nick told me on his locals.
It has nothing to do with the grooming shit or anything else that's probably valid, it's just because he's a nigger and you're autistic.

 

[Hiphopopotamus]

Far be it from me to defend Drexel, but I know of zero evidence Drex has raped anyone, children or otherwise. The narrative he's a groomer has far more evidence, don't muddy the waters with baseless shit.

Yeah that's why I put "(grooms?)" in there.

 

[Love Machine]

People just need to admit that the forum makes them mad. Pretending that youre above it all and it just rolls off you is so gay when everyone can tell how deeply it bothers you. Pretending it doesnt make you mad only makes it so much worse because you cant just be honest.

 

[not william stenchever]

@Null Just in case you wanted one of many direct things to respond to on MATI right from Drexel's mouth I have re-archived the below for you. In this he explicitly mentions the age "13 or 14". This is also something from long after the backlash started so this is his defensive telling of the story in a way that he thinks makes himself look good and it is still disgusting.

I hope one of my fellow Kiwis endeavors to link or provide a more thorough compilation but I unfortunately don't have the time right now. This is just the first one that popped into my head. Assuming you're interested in actually responding to this, obviously.


videoplayback.mp4

Why are you intimidating Null and forcing him to cover Drex incriminating himself with his own words?

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

Yeah that's why I put "(grooms?)" in there.

You're still muddying the waters with a child rape accusation. Don't be like Nick. Don't accuse degenerates of child rape without actual evidence.

I can already hear Drexel running to his Discord to excitedly type "JOSH FARMS ACCUSIN MAH OF RAPE AN SHIET. I DON NEEDA RAPE NO ONE NO HOW CAUSE HOW BIG MUH DICK! SHIEEEEEEEET."