📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

[Lady Rackets Ass]

Foreboding Louis XVI vibes.

Wyświetl załącznik 5209573

This guy has seen your wife naked.

 

[The handsome tard]

But he lost inches of height and has wide hips and c cup breasts now!!! His family just doesn't know cuz they're dumb conservatives!!

Really though. This reeks of a persecution complex.

This, my bullshit alert is off the scale. The story feels very...propaganda-ish

remember, KF users: your life may be shitty, but luckily it isn’t as shitty as the trannies featured in this thread.

This whole site is filled with ego boosts. I love it

 

[duckling]

Half on-topic sperg.

A few months ago I made a comment in this thread about how to argue against troon language in women's health. Well. I recently was fucking thrilled when a paper from 2022 came across my desk regarding the importance of using sexed language in pregnancy, birth, lactation, breastfeeding, and newborn care. This is a great article to share with the most insufferable people in your lives because it is very sympathetic to the troon agenda but extremely firm that women are neither chestfeeders nor birthers. It also comes with some great buzzwords to smash around. Without further ado, here it is: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2022.818856/full

Spoiler: choice quotes

Where the concept of gender identity is salient, desexing the language of female reproduction has emerged as an accommodation to remedy marginalization. However, it needs to be kept in mind that pregnant and birthing women and new mothers and their infants have unique vulnerabilities and also require protection.

In response to Queer Theory-derived concerns, many organizations and individuals are changing the language they use to describe women so as to prioritize gendered understandings and avoid sexed terminology. [...] However, there appears to have been little consideration of the ethics of these changes, including the principles of avoiding harm and health maximization, or how they may impact on women and children's rights.

Using language that respects childbearing women is imperative given the prevalence of obstetric violence. Considering women in relation to males as “non-men” or “non-males”, treats the male body as standard and hearkens back to the sexist Aristotelian conceptualization of women as failed men.

Notably, desexing language in relation to males occurs less frequently.

Describing the frequency of sex-specific conditions referring to people rather than women as the denominator means incidence may be misreported. For example, it has been incorrectly stated that “1 in 8 people” develop breast cancer, that “8 in 10 people” will get pregnant after having unprotected sex, and that “1 in 10 people” have endometriosis (our emphases). On the other hand, correctly stating that 1 in 20 people have endometriosis reduces the cognitive impact of the statistic because of the higher denominator and obfuscates a key feature of the condition: that sufferers are almost exclusively female, and males have virtually zero risk (with just a handful of cases ever described).

Honestly there are so many good ones in there that it does the paper a disservice to only pick a few quotes so I won't go on. The whole thing is gold.

Favorite buzzwords to slap troons with: mother-infant dyad, cultural imperialism, linguistic imperialism, colonialism

 

[Roland TB-303]

@duckling

This is a handmaiden article. Using gay language is just playing into their hands. Just point and laugh instead as the troon shrinks in horror and retreats back to their hovel when confronted.

 

[Manat]

Archive

Archive/ Archive

MTFs are tragic

 

[The Skeksis Emperor]

To be honest if I walked in on that I'd just pity them. There are bros on /fit/ right now crying that they can't achieve that arm/hand vascularity and low body fat. It's not even Halloween yet, silly spooky skeletons.

 

[LobsterBoy669]

The one in the middle has a fucking visible goatee. Jesus Christ man, you couldn't pay comedy writers to make something funnier than this.

 

[Omen_Sulk]

https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1679670596722913281

 

[Coo Coo Bird]

Wyświetl załącznik 5210266

https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1679670596722913281

>South African castrating black boys
Makes you think, don't it?

 

[AnOminous]

>South African castrating black boys
Makes you think, don't it?

Imagine a rich white woman buying two black children and neutering them. To think, slavery is back but now it's "woke."

 

[lolcow yoghurt]

Wyświetl załącznik 5210067

Was this taken before eating souls of the innocent?

 

[Raw Onion Enjoyer]

Wyświetl załącznik 5210266

https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1679670596722913281

She's going full TND

 

[sashimi]

>South African castrating black boys
Makes you think, don't it?

Imagine a rich white woman buying two black children and neutering them. To think, slavery is back but now it's "woke."

Don't tell me they actually got castrated.

Like I said, funny troon shenanigans are one thing, but involving children is a whole different matter and I wish nothing but pain on freaks who do that.

 

[Nicholas II of Russia]

Tranny janny from the MtF Reddit removes post by liberal transgender and labels it as ‘hate speech’

Original post saw a pro-#migrant Belgian transgender complaining about verbal and physical assaults from Arab migrants.

 

[AssignedEva]

Nice of them to protect someone's right to hold beliefs privately in their head as long as they never say them out loud.

One bit of the specific wording is "This does not, however, mean that it is acceptable indiscriminately and gratuitously to refer to a trans person in terms other than they would wish". In other words it's explicitly ok to refer to a trans woman as a biological male in certain contexts.

With "Religion or belief" being a protected characteristic, it still has to interface with the other protected characteristics and the expectation that a workplace has "dignity, respect and courtesy"; you don't want a Muslim freaking out at coworkers for eating a ham sandwich or Christians shrieking at an unmarried couple about sin in a workplace, and this is sort of the same thing. Reading between the lines it seems to be suggesting that this is protecting the right to disagree with someone doing sensitivity training and saying "sex is a social construct and everyone has a gender identity". You can't go up to a random trans coworker and say "you're a man lol" but you can voice an opinion that contradicts their self image if they're specifically talking to you about it, without getting dinged for harassment. Likewise it's explicitly stating that a trans employee (without a gender recognition certificate) can be compelled to not use the ladies' room, which will by its nature come with a conversation that involves acknowledging things that they do not wish to be acknowledged.

There's some more juicy quotes

“My existence is not a belief. How can my safety be just as important as someone’s belief that I shouldn’t be safe? This feels like it was written by someone gender critical, just to give transphobes more clout.”

Last year, VICE News first reported that single-sex spaces could be restricted to those with GRCs – even though they are currently held by as little as 1 percent of trans people in the country. The new leaked document appears to confirm the UK government’s rollout of that plan, and the staff member said this left them “speechless.”

One civil servant, who isn’t trans, told VICE that the plans are “terrifying.” They also said: “I’m shaken by all of this and I know trans civil servants are too. How are transphobic views so mainstream now?” They added that the document will “validate gender critical views” and “push LGBTQ rights back even further”, saying: “I’m a middle aged cisgender gay man who has seen all of this before. It sucked growing up with this level of hate in the 80s and 90s, and it’s scary that the UK is becoming increasingly hostile to queer people.”

Responding to this story, Robbie de Santos, Stonewall’s director of external affairs, said: “The leaked guidance contains many highly exclusionary and reprehensible suggestions that, combined, would effectively make it impossible for trans people to work in the civil service. Not only would this guidance be unworkable in practice, but it would be unlikely to stand up to legal challenge, as it brazenly ignores the long-established rules around single-sex spaces as outlined in the UK's world-class Equality Act.
“Everyone should have the same opportunity to thrive in the workplace. But these guidelines would serve only to promote bullying and exclusion of trans people - a group who already experience diminished career prospects.”

To be clear, single sex spaces under the Equality Act must "be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim", but the guidance acknowledges "protecting the privacy and dignity of others" is a legitimate aim. A specific example given by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (the government body that is responsible for the enforcement of equality laws) is:

Example: A community centre has separate male and female toilets. It conducts a survey in which some service users say that they would not use the centre if the toilets were open to members of the opposite biological sex, for reasons of privacy and dignity or because of their religious belief. It decides to introduce an additional gender-neutral toilet. It puts up signs telling all users that they may use either the toilet for their biological sex or to use the gender neutral toilet if they feel more comfortable doing so.

Having a blanket approach in every single office could face challenge like Stonewall says, but it's pretty clear - "If the only such separate and internally lockable facilities are those for disabled employees, you can require a transitioning employee to use these gender-neutral facilities for a reasonable period (which may be as long as the duration of the 'real life experience') pending further discussion". "Real life experience" is referring to the time it takes to get a Gender Recognition Certificate.

So if there's people in the office who specifically complain about a trans person in the womens' room, which is acknowledged now as something they have a right to do, you can tell them they have to go use a single occupancy toilet until they get a GRC that says they're legally a woman and this is fully compliant. I suppose they might be alluding to going to the European Court of Human Rights which may overrule this approach with the Equality Act.

 

[Privileged White Bitch]

Another update on the Sarah Jane Baker kerfuffle:

Sisters Uncut, a feminist group, made a post on Twitter about the arrest calling it "a political attack on a trans woman by simply for speaking out loud a hypothetical self defence" (learn to proofread, retards) and encouraging people to come and protest at the Westminster Magistrates court at 10am this morning!



A GC dude went along to have a look and took some photos & video.
The protest was pretty small and surprisingly (for trannies) quiet. Maybe they're finally learning that threatening violence to get what they want isn't the best way to go about things?

 

[Procrastinhater]

This guy has seen your wife naked.

That's Louis XVI. He saw everyone's wife naked. It was the law.

 

[Positron]

One bit of the specific wording is "This does not, however, mean that it is acceptable indiscriminately and gratuitously to refer to a trans person in terms other than they would wish". In other words it's explicitly ok to refer to a trans woman as a biological male in certain contexts.

Is there a context at all in which this is not appropriate?

 

[Procrastinhater]

>South African castrating black boys
Makes you think, don't it?

Sounds like a lekker idea to me, ek se.

 

[AssignedEva]

The protest was pretty small and surprisingly (for trannies) quiet. Maybe they're finally learning that threatening violence to get what they want isn't the best way to go about things?

"I want to make sure my protest outside a Magistrate's Court is taken seriously. Hmm, how should I do my hair today?"

"Pigtails with bows in! Perfect!"
The bloke popping into frame and awkwardly waving while saying "hello!" was pretty funny, though.
The "South London Loves Trans People" banner was at Trans Pride. I had a Google about them and got onto a story I hadn't heard of - The Honor Oak Pub in Forest Hill has been doing drag queen story time on the last Saturday of the month, and the last five have been protested by Turning Point UK and in turn counter protested by people from the local area. They made the banner for that special.

In May there was a brawl that resulted in one of the far-rightists getting a broken rib, so at the June one Turning Point UK started chanting they'd "kick the shit out" of the counter protestors. They charged the counter protestors to try and nick their flags. There were some very confused signs present

I say "confused" because she's demanding the police be defunded (despite the police doing their best to keep the protesters separate and safe) and "abolish capitalism" (when this is a pub making money by hosting drag queen story time + drag brunches).
Anyway one of the counter protestors got in a scuffle with the far right protesters, and then it appears actually might have got accidentally punched in the face by a copper trying to arrest the far right protester.

The red circle is because Turning Point UK are arguing he bit his red pen to get ink all over while pretending it was blood (he declined medical attention too, which makes it a bit suss).
Also I know this isn't "Far Right Protestor Sideshows" but this video of a Turning Point UK protester trying to charge the counter protest is too funny not to include.

Oh and I forgot to mention this is all happening directly opposite Dalmain Primary School, and they seem to get kids together there on Saturdays to go play football. God knows what they make of all this.
I'm a rubbernecker so I was debating going down for a couple of drinks for the July one just to watch from inside the pub, but unfortunately they're not doing their story time for the next two months.

If you're curious about the flyers, here they are: