- Dołączono
- 15 Cze 2020
Rebel media’s lawyers did well, but because of the other behaviour of Rebel Media (following Jonny around and asking him certain questions repestedly), costs weren’t awarded.
Did they actually profit from this overall venture?
Yaniv's lawsuit against Rebel Media dismissed, BC Supreme Court weighs in - This judge was not having any of Jonny's nonsense.
- Twórca wątku Hamplanet Fitness
- Data rozpoczęcia
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Did they actually profit from this overall venture?
- Dołączono
- 3 Kwi 2021
This gives me some hope for Canada.
Clint's Burden
kiwifarms.net
- Dołączono
- 19 Lip 2021
Absolutely, he's a poor leader. I'm hoping he gets voted out fairly soon. I couldn't agree with you more on that.
Also, let us consider your current leader and lets agree to disagree.
- Dołączono
- 16 Lut 2016
There are interesting aspects of this as I read through this, the first that stood out to me is unsurprising but disappointing nonetheless:
I dunno, I think it's highly relevant given the evidence showing a connection between getting diddled and becoming a pedo, which given all the other aspects of Yaniv speaks to the potential public interest in this fact. Perhaps Rebel News decided not to adequately argue this point as they figured there was a low chance of success for Jonny and gilding this particular lily was not in their interests when sufficient much easier to present evidence to clear them existed.
This part is fucking hilarious
"It has repeatedly been held that there is no such tort in Canadian law"
This part is particularly interesting given the memes about free speech in Canada, I guess there is a kernel of based somewhere within after all:
This seems to somewhat mirror the "actual malice" standard in the US (meaning, you had knowledge of the falsity and repeated it anyway) though the wording from the case mentioning "outrageous and ridiculous" opinions is interesting in that it suggests that it might actually go further in the grey areas than the US standard, but being neither a lawyer nor a Canadian, nor having done any research outside the document here, take that analysis with a grain of salt.
I dunno, I think it's highly relevant given the evidence showing a connection between getting diddled and becoming a pedo, which given all the other aspects of Yaniv speaks to the potential public interest in this fact. Perhaps Rebel News decided not to adequately argue this point as they figured there was a low chance of success for Jonny and gilding this particular lily was not in their interests when sufficient much easier to present evidence to clear them existed.
This part is fucking hilarious
"It has repeatedly been held that there is no such tort in Canadian law"
This part is particularly interesting given the memes about free speech in Canada, I guess there is a kernel of based somewhere within after all:
This seems to somewhat mirror the "actual malice" standard in the US (meaning, you had knowledge of the falsity and repeated it anyway) though the wording from the case mentioning "outrageous and ridiculous" opinions is interesting in that it suggests that it might actually go further in the grey areas than the US standard, but being neither a lawyer nor a Canadian, nor having done any research outside the document here, take that analysis with a grain of salt.
- Dołączono
- 10 Lip 2020
You're talking about Tranada. If this is truly even a victory, it is short lived. This is still the country that will jail you for misgendering your own child. People are mad and they should be. I wish Canada hadn't fucked themselves this badly, but they did.
- Dołączono
- 29 Mar 2019
Well, we sure did. That's got to count as a moral victory, if nothing else.
- Dołączono
- 15 Cze 2020
The judgement absolutely slammed Jonny Yaniv, but referred to him with female pronouns all the way.
Pretty grody isn’t it?
- Dołączono
- 7 Maj 2018
The Farms always wins. The Harvest continues.
John being referred to as female makes the whole judgment funnier to me.
- Dołączono
- 6 Gru 2020
Depends, are parents going to be there?
- Dołączono
- 25 Maj 2018
No adults allowed.
- Dołączono
- 2 Wrz 2015
It would be noble in some way if they did this as a test case to set legal precedent.
Anyway, someone as odious as Yaniv was going to provoke this at some point. Get fucked Yaniv.
- Dołączono
- 6 Gru 2020
What if they identify as 6-year-old girls?
- Dołączono
- 31 Lip 2021
Yaniv's entire defense was "Yeah, I'm sexually attracted to children, but misgendering me is wrong!"
May God strike him down, but not before he provides us with another 100 pages of material.
May God strike him down, but not before he provides us with another 100 pages of material.
- Dołączono
- 31 Gru 2018
In Canada the legislature can define the bounds of this, Canadian courts will rarely tend to restrict the legislature outside of specifics that they say go too far at the moment. It's quite hard to get something entirely struck down because there's no First Amendment type thing to appeal to. The Canadian Constitution pretty much says your free speech rights end if the legislature says they do but if the legislature hasn't said anything yet you can use them as far as courts will allow. Yaniv could call up Trudeau and have Parliament specifically rewrite the law with a simple majority to protect him going forward today if they wanted to.
It's basically not "actual malice" to call Yaniv a pedophile in the United States because a "reasonable person" will not assume you're making a factual claim about a criminal charge, they'll assume you're saying "I think this dude is a pedophile" especially if you then lay out all the reasons you're calling someone a pedophile and none of it is pointing to actual criminal charges. Same for "disability faker" there's no requirement for you to prove this claim is true. This seems to be saying, though I haven't looked at the higher court case, that is less of a defense in Canada because your "facts" behind your opinion can be wrong which would make you liable. Yaniv failed to show that the facts did not support Rebel News' case, the judge instead seems to think the facts presented to him support them entirely, but presumably if he had the judge could have said Rebel News behaved unreasonably or outrageously. Yaniv, like many people in American courts attempt constantly, tried to skip that step and simply say that saying anything negative about them is defamation. Which is a hard sell in a regular Canadian or even European court (aka not a Human Rights Tribunal) despite the lack of all-purpose American style carve out. (The UK's libel reform, while unideal, also thankfully went in this direction.)
- Dołączono
- 9 Lis 2018
Remember how the US and Russia launched chimps and dogs into space for them to drift into the void?
Can we just do that with Yaniv? But instead of aiming him at nothing, can we just whip him at the sun?
Can we crowdfund this? I'd crowdfund this.
- Dołączono
- 7 Maj 2022
Now that you mention it, it is probably about time for Russia to crash another vessel into Venus. I think we need a manned expedition this time though. I like your volunteer.
- Dołączono
- 27 Kwi 2015
- Dołączono
- 9 Cze 2018
What makes you think I'm American?