James Terry Mitchell Jr. / JTM / werewolf2814 / 2814werewolf / everyoneisworthyoflove (Thread #1) - Tumblr/leddit anti-sjw pedophile sexual predator, once asked a woman for tit blood, gross horny neckbeard

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
ToroidalBoat powiedział(a):
"Damn them all to Gre'thor or Tartarus" - The Molester Of Walnut Street

I'm guessing JTM thinks he's being pretty clever and intimidating there. And if anyone were to go to a fictional Klingon hell or a hell from Greek mythology, it'd probably be an unrepentant child molester.

edit: Also, it looks like JTM says that if it weren't for the law, he'd kill people who angered him. Ladies, he's single!
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
How can I go to a spaceman hell I didn't know about! (:_(

Anyway, I doubt James' first action would be to murder people if the law didn't bar it / exist. He's too much of a coward in every sense of the word. He's too scared to admit he raped an abused girl, he's too afraid to come back here, and he's too frightened of change and effort to try and make a better person of himself.
He's certainly too much of a whiny bitch to throw a punch at someone, let alone kill them.
No, I think if the law didn't exist, his first action would be to rape more children. Because that's the sort of person that @James Terry Mitchell Jr is.
 
I think this was posted before we lost content. I still find it astonishing. "It doesn't effect me now." Yeah, no shit.

Capture21.PNG
 
"...but for a child even if it were legal & I found her attractive she would also have to arouse my mind as well as my loins."

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't he say that the only reason he raped the 9 year old was because nobody his own age would lower their standards enough to fuck him?
WHAT IS THE TRUTH
 
In other news:
Up to 80% of people are pedophilic, and 20% are pedosexual! TIL.
Screen Shot 2016-01-27 at 9.05.48 AM.png

The girl's mother brought her to hang out with him! She didn't press charges "because the mother knew it was love"! The grandmother had to put a stop to it! :cryblood:
Screen Shot 2016-01-27 at 9.11.41 AM.png

And apparently he thought a relationship with a girl 7 years younger than him was legal, and wanted to marry her.
 
Lol, what research? Look at all this slander we're spreading guys. We're so evil making things up. It's not like James voluntarily digs a whole for himself.
 
APerson powiedział(a):
In other news:
Up to 80% of people are pedophilic, and 20% are pedosexual! TIL.
Wyświetl załącznik 70364
The girl's mother brought her to hang out with him! She didn't press charges "because the mother knew it was love"! The grandmother had to put a stop to it! :cryblood:
Wyświetl załącznik 70367
And apparently he thought a relationship with a girl 7 years younger than him was legal, and wanted to marry her.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
That last image is broken, at least for me. What did he say? I'm fascinated by how he tried to justify the indefensible.
 
This degenerate is trying to fucking defend his horrible actions like usual. The fact that he is claiming that pedophilia is not sexual attraction to children is really putting the nail in his coffin.
 
DirkBloodStormKing powiedział(a):
This degenerate is trying to fucking defend his horrible actions like usual. The fact that he is claiming that pedophilia is not sexual attraction to children is really putting the nail in his coffin.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

I think what's kind of hilarious about it tho is the way he's defining these words. Given his definitions of words with the roots -sexual and -philia, you could conclude the following:

homosexuality, or any sexuality, is only for hookups and nothing more. According to him, the correct term for a homosexual relationship would be "homophilia". Bisexuality would be biphilia, heterosexuality would be heterophilia, asexuality would be aphilia. According to James' logic, anything beyond casual sex is not actually sexuality.
 
yeast god powiedział(a):
I think what's kind of hilarious about it tho is the way he's defining these words. Given his definitions of words with the roots -sexual and -philia, you could conclude the following:

homosexuality, or any sexuality, is only for hookups and nothing more. According to him, the correct term for a homosexual relationship would be "homophilia". Bisexuality would be biphilia, heterosexuality would be heterophilia, asexuality would be aphilia. According to James' logic, anything beyond casual sex is not actually sexuality.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
So even by his own warped definition he's still a "pedosexual." He did say he only raped that girl because nobody else wanted to have sex with him.

Even at sixteen most people would rather never have sex than fuck a child, James.
 
yeast god powiedział(a):
...what?
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...
Oh god it's like my pet lolcow going on about how he's not a zoophile but a zooromantic who wants to have a romantic relationship with an animal. According to him this is a necessary term because too often when people talk of zoophiles they actually mean zoosadists who enjoy hurting animals.

No you sick fuck. An animal isn't having romantic ideas about you and you are taking advantage of them in effect being as much a zoosadist as you claim to hate.

Of course Pedobear here finishes it off by saying that maybe the child wants a romantic relation with the adult. The wishfulfillment is strong with that pervert.
 
James, please stop insisting that all guys want to fuck kids. I can assure you I do not. I can also assure you that the only reason you're not in jail in because the family didn't cooperate with the cops, because they wanted to keep the father out of jail. That's it.
 
yeast god powiedział(a):
I think what's kind of hilarious about it tho is the way he's defining these words. Given his definitions of words with the roots -sexual and -philia, you could conclude the following:

homosexuality, or any sexuality, is only for hookups and nothing more. According to him, the correct term for a homosexual relationship would be "homophilia". Bisexuality would be biphilia, heterosexuality would be heterophilia, asexuality would be aphilia. According to James' logic, anything beyond casual sex is not actually sexuality.
Kliknij, aby rozwinąć...

Well, there was the homophile rights movement back in the 1940s and 1950s, where they used the term to denote that it wasn't just about sex, which is a common stigma regarding homosexuality among homophobes, and because homosexual at the time had negative and clinical implications. However, language changes and homosexual's an acceptable term again. Homophile as a term is not used anymore except in historical contexts or archaically.

But James doesn't mean that and likely knows nothing of LGBT rights, let alone any history of it prior to the Gay Liberation variation from Stonewall onward. He just wants to try to redefine terms so he's seen as less of a sick fuck. It won't work because everyone with a functioning brain stem can see past the ruse and he's still by his own definition a "pedosexual."
 
Status
Nie jest otwarta na dalsze odpowiedzi.
Wstecz
Top Na dole