bring in enough hardcore muslims and by sheer influence, womans rights, gay rights and trans rights go back like 50 years.
Where do you think their rise of muh "anti-Semitic" is coming from.
I would prefer waiting
We're getting there, and while Antifags may relish the opportunity to larp as Vasily Zaitsev they're just going to be end up like their OG namesakes.
Ok then, it depends how invested the beaner is in being a US citizen and pulling down roots in the USA. And a lot of them are white, as in of European stock, with the odd native somewhere in the background. Like most white people already here tbh.
Yeah but then child grooming gangs will go up in number.
one musllim guy in scandinavia, got away with the "sexual emergency" excuse.
I mean, the whole reason we are in this thread is because “Kyle is a white supremacist”. When in reality he is nothing more than a good kid watching over his community.
I can't believe you didn't include the smokeshow detective for the defense.
I know it's a shopped meme, but the ease with which everyone (including Backdoor Binger and Fatboy) treats alleged mass shooter Kyle Rittenhouse being right up close to them speaks volumes. No one believes he's this evil mass serial murderer, not even the prosecution.
I was thinking that what a better way to make his brand explode than defending Kyle Rittenhouse.
They are crying wolf with the use of "white supremacist" to the point where when it's actually applicable nobody will give a shit.
If Kyle goes to prison, maybe at some point his case will go to the Supreme Court and other red states will get the kick in ass needed to expand self defense laws.
If Kyle loses, it could shatter the illusion of fairness in the judicial system. Judge Schroeder knows that many people's faith in the ability to get a fair trial is also on the line.
And their leaders are not encumbered by principles; to them, the ends justify the means. They're never concerned with their own side breaking the law or harming innocent third parties, only with getting caught or someone standing in their way.
SCOTUS doesn't hear criminal cases in the sense of guilty vs not guilty; they decide whether or not laws are constitutional.
I’m assuming yes.
They don't even care about that, they're all pawns and when their usefulness expires, they're thrown out.
Yea. Racket's chat was melting down with all the simping.
