The only stuff that annoys me is when chicks like that mohawk faggot troon out and then you've got a 5'1" turbo-manlet with a vagina telling you why your expression of masculinity is so inferior to theirs.
Who cares. These people are like 1% of the population. Anyone who claims to LGBT and intersex is lying.Somewhat incorrect.
This is swyer syndrome phenotype- it's clearly reads as sorta-kinda man in the vein of Eastern Germany female swimmer, but the people affected do consider themselves mostly women and don't display much difference until puberty. They have male proto gonads and shallow pseudo-vagina.
Wyświetl załącznik 2581602
The Woman With Unusual DNA: Swyer Syndrome | Medical Documentary | Reel Truth
Jeanne Nollman fails to hit puberty and is being told that she is just a late bloomer. Her doctor tells her that her ovaries are underdeveloped and can becom...www.youtube.com
What you're talking about is rather Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) (it's different from androgen insensitivity syndrome). People affected are pretty much phenotypicaly female and some even have fully developed ovaries and uterus and at least one case is know of a XY CAIS female to have given birth (tho, to be honest, I guess it's rather impossible to figure out CAIS if such woman has everything functional without genetic testing, so the real numbers are unknown and we really only can count those who are do still have male features, because those are getting tested mostly).
Wyświetl załącznik 2581600Wyświetl załącznik 2581603
That being said, it is still true, that genetically they are male, failed genetically, but genetically still male. Just because your Y doesn't work as designed it doesn't mean you don't have it. If intersex people are few permile (as most intersex embryos are not vible and miscarried early) and CAIS is estimated at 2-5 per 100 000 (0,002-5%), statistically speaking it's nonsignifacant in saying that female are XX and male are XY, binary is and it always was the same and non changing, even if it fails to properly express genetic coding. So I would call CAIS person a woman in social context, but I would still consider them male.
they produce viable eggs you say? could they theoretically produce an egg with a y chromosome? could this then be fertilized by a y carrying sperm to produce a YY genotype embryo? then what would a YY human phenotype look like? is this how we will eventually breed the real IRL gigachad of the future, a literal double-male man?Somewhat incorrect.
This is swyer syndrome phenotype- it's clearly reads as sorta-kinda man in the vein of Eastern Germany female swimmer, but the people affected do consider themselves mostly women and don't display much difference until puberty. They have male proto gonads and shallow pseudo-vagina.
Wyświetl załącznik 2581602
The Woman With Unusual DNA: Swyer Syndrome | Medical Documentary | Reel Truth
Jeanne Nollman fails to hit puberty and is being told that she is just a late bloomer. Her doctor tells her that her ovaries are underdeveloped and can becom...
What you're talking about is rather Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) (it's different from androgen insensitivity syndrome). People affected are pretty much phenotypicaly female and some even have fully developed ovaries and uterus and at least one case is know of a XY CAIS female to have given birth (tho, to be honest, I guess it's rather impossible to figure out CAIS if such woman has everything functional without genetic testing, so the real numbers are unknown and we really only can count those who are do still have male features, because those are getting tested mostly).
Wyświetl załącznik 2581600Wyświetl załącznik 2581603
That being said, it is still true, that genetically they are male, failed genetically, but genetically still male. Just because your Y doesn't work as designed it doesn't mean you don't have it. If intersex people are few permile (as most intersex embryos are not vible and miscarried early) and CAIS is estimated at 2-5 per 100 000 (0,002-5%), statistically speaking it's nonsignifacant in saying that female are XX and male are XY, binary is and it always was the same and non changing, even if it fails to properly express genetic coding. So I would call CAIS person a woman in social context, but I would still consider them male.
I agree but I'm not so offended as amused. Some lady on the internet is going to tell me that I feel inferior to her strap on? Really? I don't want to get into my sex life but think about what you're saying, madam.
You've got it switched around CAIS is the one that has internal male gonad, shallow vulva that leads to nowhere, and there's no case where they gave birth. They do not have uterus to make that possible. (They're technically 'male' because they do have balls)Somewhat incorrect.
This is swyer syndrome phenotype- it's clearly reads as sorta-kinda man in the vein of Eastern Germany female swimmer, but the people affected do consider themselves mostly women and don't display much difference until puberty. They have male proto gonads and shallow pseudo-vagina.
Wyświetl załącznik 2581602
The Woman With Unusual DNA: Swyer Syndrome | Medical Documentary | Reel Truth
Jeanne Nollman fails to hit puberty and is being told that she is just a late bloomer. Her doctor tells her that her ovaries are underdeveloped and can becom...
What you're talking about is rather Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) (it's different from androgen insensitivity syndrome). People affected are pretty much phenotypicaly female and some even have fully developed ovaries and uterus and at least one case is know of a XY CAIS female to have given birth (tho, to be honest, I guess it's rather impossible to figure out CAIS if such woman has everything functional without genetic testing, so the real numbers are unknown and we really only can count those who are do still have male features, because those are getting tested mostly).
Wyświetl załącznik 2581600Wyświetl załącznik 2581603
That being said, it is still true, that genetically they are male, failed genetically, but genetically still male. Just because your Y doesn't work as designed it doesn't mean you don't have it. If intersex people are few permile (as most intersex embryos are not vible and miscarried early) and CAIS is estimated at 2-5 per 100 000 (0,002-5%), statistically speaking it's nonsignifacant in saying that female are XX and male are XY, binary is and it always was the same and non changing, even if it fails to properly express genetic coding. So I would call CAIS person a woman in social context, but I would still consider them male.
Very true. It's not intimidating - it's merely annoying in a way that's exclusive to sanctimonious lectures from nosy women.
Women have nothing to do with it. It's hilarious that anyone who knows nothing about being a man would try to dictate to men what it means to be one. I've known biological men in her exact same position. Chris Chan is going through learn this lesson when he goes to prison. We are who we are, biology exists. It takes more than hormones to make a man or a woman. Where is the line? I'm too uneducated to say with any authority, but that line exists and none of the cows have yet crossed it. Certainly not this danger hair freak.
I was thinking about this the other day. I know two guys with AGP, one transitioned and one not. Both are obsessed with lesbians. Both have lesbian sisters. Hmmmm.
That's the funny thing, individuals with DSDs don't have higher rates of transgenderism. (Some troons like to claim otherwise, but you'll find most of the studies supporting that conclusion involve anonymous surveys distributed on places like tumblr, asking people if they "identify as intersex")
I've heard that from a few detransitioners before. I can imagine testosterone blunts emotions to some extent. (And aggravates other emotions, like anger.) It's interesting.
Sex isn't a spectrum though.
The thing is, sex isn't tied strictly to the Y chromosome itself, but more specifically the SRY gene that is almost always found on the Y chromosome. An XY individual with a mangled SRY gene is female. Or if the SRY gene gets transposed (another genetic anomaly) to the X chromosome, you can end up with an XX male.
I don’t know what level of cognitive ability I expect here, but I’d hope he at least understands you don’t get resume credit for IMAGINARY FUTURE WORK
Women have more genetic material than men and that is thanks to our second chromosomes. There are also 6500 (known) genes that separates males from females. This Yale talk discusses this in detail:
Source.
Swyer's Syndrome women are women as they do not have an SRY gene. That is the specific gene on the Y chromosome that allows for male development. If it is deleted, defective or does not work in any manner, the fetus develops as female. They have a developmental disorder; they are not actually trans. Hasci Horvath (givethemseeds on Twitter) posted studies showing trans people having normal chromosomal pairs.It does, but it really doesn’t do much. The Y-Chromosome is basically an “on” switch to start making dude parts. Some of the genes it activates are on the X chromosome. Some are elsewhere. As the old biochemistry joke goes “there’s only one chromosome you can live without and it affects nearly 51% of the population”
There are in fact cases of women with XY genomes. I don’t mean trans women, I mean real honest to goodness women who’s physical deformities aren’t detectable by the average Joe. These women “suffer” from a messed up Y chromosome, so the body just defaulted to X and went ahead and made a girl. There are some side effects of course. Some need hormonal replacement and some get a surgery to clean up any malformed internal tissues, but it’s not unheard of.
This is generally why I think that there are some truly trans people out there, because the genetics can get a bit blurry, hell, everything in biology is a bit blurry. It’s the level trans people we are seeing and what they are trying to push that scares me, not that they use some of biology’s weirder habits to make a point.
Swyer syndrome: MedlinePlus Genetics
Swyer syndrome is a condition that affects sex development. Explore symptoms, inheritance, genetics of this condition.medlineplus.gov
Sex is determined at fertilization, so 'female as the default' isn't true. Female being a base set is true as the organism we evolved from went from single-sexed to dual-sexed. The only beings capable of parthenogenesis are all female. DSDs are variations within sex, not variations of, and many, many transactivists and scientists are not aware of this.
we're nazis?
